Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Links to Laboratory Viruses

It is early 2022. The world feels as if we are living in some kind of strange void. Nothing seems the same. No one remembers what normal is. Discussions on returning to normal seem to have drifted to the ground like the leaves that fell in autumn. Temperatures in Wisconsin were below zero. Just a few minutes outside and you can feel the stinging cold. Is it a reminder of the state of the world, or is the cold a premonition of what is to come?

It would take volumes to write a list of what has gone wrong over the past year. The beginning of a new year usually brings hope. Not in 2022. The administration and media have been working over time for more than a year to spread every form of hopelessness and fear. To top it all off, 2021 ended with the threat of war while 2022 appears to make that threat a reality.

With temperatures at seasonable lows, it seems nothing short of total insanity to mass troops along the Russian/Ukraine border in January. I grew up hearing stories about the Battle of the Bulge. I heard about the cold. Living a winter in Germany during a war. No one could start a fire. It would give away their position and that meant certain death as the enemy laid in the woods just a few hundred yards away. They lived through the winter without the slightest hope of warmth. Imagine living in those conditions for months. When I go outside I can’t help but remember those stories and think of the solders along the Ukraine border sitting there waiting for a collection of what is described as a group of muppets altered by radiation poisoning to make a decision. Today we live with the words, “the only thing to fear is turning on the news to find out what went wrong today.” That about sums up the past year.

We’ve lived under the threat of covid-19 for more than two years. We’ve gone through lock downs, hoarding, shortages, record inflation, the US southern border have been open for a year now with people and drugs streaming in faster than the wind, major cities have seen crime waves like never before, and we all wait to see, what’s next. China has been threatening Taiwan and Singapore for months. Then Russia massed troops along their border with Ukraine. We have become used to having news spoon fed to us. The administration has not been able to answer any questions. Except for threats leveled at those who don’t support their party and one sided ideas. The parallel between the course the US and for that part, most of the world has taken an eerie resemblance to that of Venezuela when the communists took over. Reading that history appears like a playbook this administration has been following at an accelerated rate.

The threat of war we hear everyday combined with the less than adequate explanations on covid-19 and the slant the news media has taken on both subjects, every normal thinking individual in the world is asking the question, “was that virus developed in a laboratory?”

When we look at the dates funding was granted and deadly viruses were created under laboratory conditions we know it takes only a short time for modern science to give a virus what it needed to survive under extreme conditions and spread at alarming rates. Add to that the fact, covid-19 has been the most deadly virus in our life span and we get a bad feeling about the treat of wars the administration has not explained. We know about WW1 and chemical weapons used during that war. Today chemical warfare has taken on a new meaning. Of course agreements were signed. Throughout the world chemical warfare has been banned. But what is a treaty to those who refuse to honor the Constitution, ignore every law, and want to conquer the world and feel they have the power to carry out their plans?

That void we feel is what can be termed the perfect storm with an eerie moment of silence before the storm hits. We see the darkness on the horizon and wonder how sever the storm will actually be. There is nothing to do but sit, wait, and pray. Confidence is so low and the outlook bleak, it almost seems more humane to curse those responsible than do the Christian thing and pray for them. Life has shown us what happens to the average mind when spoon fed a menu of hopelessness and submission on a daily basis. We can’t help but see the signs of physiological warfare unleashed across the world. We see some countries fighting against that physiological warfare. Some are winning. Some are loosing. Some countries we hear about the start of a revolution than we hear nothing at all. At times the lack of information and obvious censorship is the hardest to live with. Then we are fed a host of threats and sanctions aimed at those who do not trust the vaccines or who look at covid-19 as a myth, a part of that physiological warfare and nothing more. Not many of us have ever lived through those conditions. A few who escaped communist rule ensure us, this is part of the plan and we need to resist. Then the pressure mounts. New sanctions, higher inflation, and the threat of war getting closer. When is it all going to end? How is it going to end?

What is the possibility that covid-19 was created in a laboratory and how was it released? Was it by accident or was that part of an experiment to test the effectiveness of the new man made virus? If it was intentional, does it point to a new era of bio-weapons?

Samples from Early Wuhan Covid-19 Patients Show the Presence of Genetically Modified Henipah Virus … Guess Why? By Brian Simpson

We have not heard much about the Wuhan lab origin of SARS Cov-2 from the media, mainstream or alternative. But here is a little bit more news. Scientists have found that samples from early Wuhan COVID-19 patients show the presence of genetically modified Henipah virus. This was one of the two types of viruses sent to China by Chinese-born scientists from a Canadian laboratory. The lab was at the centre of a controversy over the firing of the scientists and collaboration with Chinese military researchers. Seems like another smoking gun here.

Samples from early Wuhan COVID-19 patients show the presence of genetically modified Henipah virus, an American scientist has found.

Henipah was one of the two types of viruses sent to China by Chinese-born scientists from a Canadian laboratory at the centre of a controversy over the firing of the scientists and collaboration with Chinese military researchers. It is not clear whether the virus found in the Chinese samples is related to the virus samples sent by the Canadian lab, which were shipped in late March 2019.

The finding was confirmed for The Epoch Times by another qualified scientist.

The evidence was first found by Dr. Steven Quay, a Seattle-based physician-scientist and former faculty member at the Stanford University School of Medicine, who looked at early COVID-19 samples uploaded by scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) shortly after China informed the World Health Organization about the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.

The issue of GoF research at WIV has been a point of contention in the United States between lawmakers and Dr. Anthony Fauci, the NIH’s head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Fauci’s organization has funded research (through EcoHealth Alliance) on coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab. U.S. Sen. Rand Paul says published work from WIV on coronaviruses shows the lab is conducting GoF research, a charge that Fauci denies.”

Based on news out of Canada, the situation is bleak. If that Canadian laboratory is part of a plan to release laboratory viruses. Canada does have its issues and is at the forefront of the news when it comes to lock downs, forced vaccinations, and sanctions aimed at the general public. At the present time the little news we get out of Canada tells us about a number of truck drivers protesting the lock downs and forced vaccinations. I wonder what the attitude of those truck drivers would be if they knew laboratories in Canada are involved in producing super viruses.

We have to take all of this with a grain of salt. We don’t have the full story about Canada, nor the virus, and when we look at the news source on the manufactured virus sent to China, we have to consider the source. An independent news outlet that quotes The Epoch Times and an unnamed scientist as its only source is less than reliable. The article does consider points on the minds of millions. But the presentation and collection of cold hard facts is less than adequate.

Mentioning the Chinese military is designed to attract attention. Both sides, the left and right have been rather good at spreading fear. We have to remember the 2016 election. A handful of people with a laptop and Internet connection made millions of dollars by creating websites, working with ad companies, and posting the most unbelievable stories about both sides running for president. Some of those fly by night news agencies even advertised to buy stories. Stories that obviously were not true, but attracted Internet traffic at a record pace. The goal was obvious. Attract as much Internet traffic as possible and watch the ad revenues flow in.

Those fly by night news agencies attracted the attention of legitimate news agencies who quickly copied and refined the system. News reporting was no longer an issue. Posting tabloid type stories was much more profitable and the bottom line was all that mattered. Internet advertising buried investigative journalism forever. The left and right news agencies jumped on the band wagon. Looking at information on ad revenue sharing and counting the number of ads, pop ups, and other forms of advertising on news sights showed the average news website can generate at least $8 every time someone visits the site. Put up a few bizarre stories and it is like a fish who cannot resist the shiny lure. Visitors click on a few other pages, the ads pop up, and the money rolls in. That is the world we live in today and that is what makes legitimate news difficult to find.

Click here to purchase eBook
Click here to purchase eBook

2022 Jan; 8

Insight into COVID-19’s epidemiology, pathology, and treatment

The newly emerged 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has urged scientific and medical communities to focus on epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, little is known about the virus causing this severe acute respiratory syndrome pandemic, coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Data already collected on viruses belonging to the coronaviridae family are of interest to improve our knowledge rapidly on this pandemic. The current review aims at delivering insight into the fundamental advances inSARS-CoV-2 epidemiology, pathophysiology, life cycle, and treatment.

Subsequently, reports presumed a potential outbreak caused by a new coronavirus, called SARS-CoV-2, with a reproductive number ranging from 2.24 – 3.58

Another article deals with a host of scientific information difficult to understand but appears more reliable than third party news sites stuffed with ads. It appears the make up of covid-19 is either an evolutionary fluke, a virus smarter than the average human, or something conceived and created in a laboratory. Take your pick or feel free to add your own explanation. We will not hear the truth in any news conference so don’t hold your breath.

When we look at requests for original grants for virus research, we know a handful of scientists gained funding by insisting natural evolution will one day lead to a super virus that could wipe out the entire planet. We also know, viruses have a short life spam and the human immune system has been able to adapt to every form of virus this world has been able to throw at it. We also know those super viruses were developed in laboratories by genetically splicing simple viruses from pigs and birds. Chinese labs concentrated on viruses from bats and who knows what. Today genetically splicing viruses and creating new, more deadly viruses is like child’s play. It takes little time and when we consider the amount of censorship we see today, we can only imagine what has been created in laboratories and what we may one day see released into this world. Of course only a totally insane individual would release any type of virus they couldn’t control. Some type of vaccine would have to be created and administered to those they feel are essential to their cause. Then that vaccine has to be tested, available, and distributed. It doesn’t take a scientist to set up and initiate such a plan. Pun intended.

On the military front, one army can infect another with a virus. Which reminds me of a story in the Bible. Jacob’s daughter was raped. The prince who raped her wanted to marry her. Jacob’s sons agreed that if all the men in that city were circumcised, the wedding would go on and Jacob’s sons would marry their daughters and men in that city would marry women from Jacob’s clan. Of course leaders in the city had plans to take all of Jacob’s possessions and get rich off the scheme. But Jacob’s sons had a plan of their own. As soon as all the men in the city were circumcised, they went into the city and killed every man, enslaved the women and children, and took every possession. I am sure a few choice leaders in this world and generals are aware of that story.

When we look at Russia and Ukraine in the middle of the 2022 winter, we have to consider the fact, a virus will not survive in the bitter cold outside. How would someone like Russia deliver a virus if that was the plan? Unless someone developed a super virus that could be delivered and survive in an air born state in freezing temperatures. Remember the initial vaccine? That vaccine had to be shipped and stored at extremely low temperatures until it was administered. Has anyone ever heard of that before? The vaccine had to consist of living virus cells to do its job. So how did those virus cells survive transportation and storage? Was there a virus cell that could be frozen and revived? Most virus cells die a few minutes in lower temperatures. Bird viruses could not survive in humans because of lower temperatures until someone created a new virus in a lab. Then we have bat viruses. Bat’s hibernate in winter where their body temperatures drop. Somehow the viruses they carry survive.

Covid-19 shares a lot of qualities with bat viruses. The viruses attack the lungs and can be fatal. That is the general make up of the SARS-CoV virus. It originated in bats and transfers to humans on rare occasions. The SARS-CoV virus is able to survive extreme conditions. The only problem is, the virus was only known to transmit through bat feces and water droplets such as saliva and of course in water vapor from human to human through coughing and sneezing. That is true in SARS-CoV’s natural environment. But what if scientists were able to extent those conditions to let’s call it, military standards.

Aug 27, 2021

Exclusive: Samples From Early Wuhan COVID Patients Had Genetically Modified Henipah, 1 of 2 Types of Viruses Sent From Canadian Lab

Perhaps you will recall the early claims that there was a link between the lab in Canada and Wuhan, which were immediately called a conspiracy theory so they do not have to answer them. The samples of the first version of COVID match what was created in the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada. Also buried deep in the story is that the scientist Dr. Frank Plummer was the director of Canada’s National Microbiology Lab, to whom the Gates Foundation handed a grant of $8.3 million. He died in Kenya weeks after the official start of the 2019 coronavirus outbreak on February 4, 2020, which happened weeks after a Gates Foundation simulation of a coronavirus outbreak.

This article proves people will go to great lengths to develop theories to make a name for themselves. The site of course has its share of ads. Which is a red flag. But when we live in a world of censorship, people can and will take advantage of the situation to enrich themselves.

We live in a world where key powers have mobilized their military and are under the threat of bio-warfare. We know one thing for sure, there is far more behind the scenes than we can ever imagine. With the development of mutant viruses able to attack the nervous system and brain, we don’t want to begin to speculate on the danger soldiers are facing today. When you live in a world resembling a collection of science fiction movies, you get the feeling, anything can happen. You have two choices. Ignore the entire situation or look into it and gather whatever facts are available. Some people prefer to lend a never dying allegiance to the powers at hand. For the most part the administration and fake news has been taking advantage of people who really believe a socialist society can solve all the world’s problems and as we have seen, are willing to fight for that concept. Then we have the other side. The side that refuses to trust any form of socialism or communism. They looked into how communists came to power just a generation ago. Russia and China caused more deaths in their take over after WWII than the total number of casualties suffered during the war. The numbers who died didn’t seem to matter to Russian and Chinese leaders. Starvation and disease were prevalent. But that wasn’t enough. To make their point clear, Russia and China added in executions on a grand scale and their form of concentration or reeducation camps. That is what the normal thinking patriots all over the world fear the most today and they are witnessing the gathering of the storm.

When we see mandatory vaccines for all military personal with no exemptions, we see a red flag. Is this preparation for bio-warfare? Are military commanders planing on disabling an opposing force with bio-weapons? We know the threat exists. We know research has gone into weapons to neutralize entire populations while leaving infrastructure intact. Only time will tell if we see those weapons in use and what they are capable of.

The problem is, which vaccine will they use and will it work? When we look at vaccines we will see how the wrong vaccine can and will spell disaster. Today we have at least half a dozen variations of covid-19. You have to be in a coma not to know about the vaccines and boosters introduced over the past year. When we look at the results, we see infections and fatality rate rising faster then before a vaccine was introduced. Which was exactly what scientists warned about when a vaccine was introduced.

We have a virus that attacks the respiratory system, one that is not any more dangerous than the seasonal flu but is deadly when people have underlying conditions. Another variant that is more deadly than seasonal flu and is more effective against healthy people. Then we have a series of variants that spread much faster and effect the nervous system and brain. The results may take weeks or months to show up. Which variant would you vaccinate the military against? Remember, if you vaccinate against the wrong variant, you could make matters mush worse.

June 19 2021

I Visited a Chinese Lab at the Center of a Biosafety Debate. What I Learned Helps Explain the Clash Over Covid-19’s Origins.

H7N9 would turn out to be a minor threat compared to SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes Covid-19, but the path it took will sound familiar to anyone who has tracked the news over the last year. Initial cases in China were followed by censorship and secrecy, which gave way to lingering suspicion of both the government and Chinese scientists.

I profiled a flu researcher who was helping authorities contain the spread of H7N9. Even as she became the point person for the outbreak, she was at the center of a scientific controversy for an experiment she had done on another avian flu virus. That work involved tweaking pathogens in order to study how they might become more contagious, a type of study that is often lumped under the shorthand “gain of function.” Proponents of such experiments argued that a better understanding of how viruses are transmitted from one species to the next could help public health experts ward off natural outbreaks. Critics worried that instead of aiding in global health, her research could spark a pandemic.

That was before gain-of-function work got stirred into the toxic stew that is American politics, before it was mixed up with feelings about former President Donald Trump and ex-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, racism and anti-racism, and faith in science. Before Republicans believed a few vocal politicians who claimed, wrongly, that the pandemic was definitely caused by a lab leak, and Democrats believed a few vocal scientists who assured them, also wrongly, that such a thing was definitely impossible.

So-called natural spillovers often happen in densely populated areas where people live close to animals. (That frequency is one reason many scientists suspect a natural origin with SARS-CoV-2.) With H7N9, the likely culprit was poultry markets. I wanted to talk with Chen about the early days of the outbreak, when her lab had scrambled to sequence and analyze H7N9 strains isolated from chickens and pigeons.

Chen’s paper on H5N1 and guinea pigs was published in May 2013, when H7N9 was still spreading through southern China. More than a dozen researchers had worked on the study, which involved 250 guinea pigs, 1,000 mice, and 27,000 infected chicken eggs. Their goal was to determine what changes would enable the H5N1 virus to spread more effectively. After swapping out the single gene, they found that an infected animal could pass the virus to a healthy one in an adjoining cage through respiratory droplets.

Virologists who did similar research had a completely different take on Chen’s work. I spoke with five of them. One quibbled with the design of the experiment, but the others used words like “exemplary” and “highly respected.” Ron Fouchier of Erasmus MC in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, told me that he had dreamed of doing exactly the same experiment as Chen but couldn’t because of various constraints. “I do not have a single grant for which I could afford to work with 13 people for two years to yield a paper, no matter how excellent that paper is,” he wrote in an email. Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin-Madison also spoke highly of Chen and told me that her lab was state of the art.

THE MOMENT of correction we’re now in is dangerous in its own way. There is still no direct evidence to support a lab leak, and many scientists with no stake in the outcome still say that a natural origin is more likely. Scientific consensus has not, in fact, shifted toward a lab origin. But some pundits with the risky combination of a lack of expertise and an agenda have argued that a lab leak caused the pandemic, case closed. Bari Weiss, the former New York Times columnist who spends most of her time railing against cancel culture, recently published an interview with Mike Pompeo, who told her that the evidence “points in the single direction of this having been a laboratory leak,” though he added, “I can’t lay down the proof for you.”

When we see China as a main player in virus development, we all begin to worry. When we see the outbreak of a major flu virus originate in China, we all begin asking questions. When we see one side turn that news into a political event, we know something is up. When they sprinkle in censorship at a level never experienced in the US before, we are certain someone is hiding something and we wonder what is really happening behind the scenes. Put that all together and we have a political atmosphere far more toxic than covid-19.

Of course much of this news comes from independent sources. Some offer links and disclose sources. That is a good start. But they always seem to support one political agenda or another and that is where the sources drop off. Some information is backed up with evidence. But then articles linger on politically motivated statements with little to no evidence to back them up. Which is why it is important to consider a number of source and pay attention to the amount of evidence presented. The average person can tell when a story drifts from investigative reporting to personal opinion.

January 21, 2020

How Much Should The Public Be Told About Research Into Risky Viruses?

There’s a lot of interest out there in how these reviews get done, notes Wolinetz, but “it’s a little bit tricky, because all of these discussions are happening before funding decisions are made. Under current rules and regulations in the government, those conversations, pre-award conversations, are protected.”

That’s to ensure, for example, that someone’s idea for a novel experiment doesn’t get stolen by another researcher. It also lets reviewers be candid in their critiques. What’s more, if a proposed study was deemed too alarming to fund, it might not make sense to make that idea available to all.

A biosafety official at his university, Rebecca Moritz, explained that specific security requirements might need to be kept secret to protect the public. In addition, she noted that the government review “contains sensitive information because, in it, we are required to detail the ways in which the research could potentially be misused.”

Beyond the question of how much information should be available about the U.S. government’s funding decisions, some continue to worry about the consequences of publicly publishing any research results that would describe how to make a pathogen more dangerous.

The HHS decision-making framework says funded research may require “risk mitigation strategies” that might include “methodologies for responsible communication of results.”

But Inglesby says that “responsible communication” has never been defined.

Of course in each of these articles I copied only cover key points. I would suggest you read the entire article. The flavor of these articles will tell the average reader if the writer is biased or unbiased. Views from different angles help to formulate an opinion as well as disclose motives behind each of these events.

Of course laboratories and scientists have security concerns. We would be in trouble if they didn’t. No one is asking for a run down including schematics of security systems. What would help is an honest answer and basic understanding in plain simple English explaining laboratory security and contingency plans. There has to be contingency plans. How are viruses secured and at what point do scientists develop a safe and effective vaccine before taking the virus to the next step? That is something I think we would all like to know.

So far we know the world today has a host of viruses far more deadly than the world has ever seen. We also know those viruses were developed to infect humans and spread as efficiently as possible. We also know some of those viruses have been engineered to survive, thrive, and mutate when vaccines are introduced. Did scientists miss anything or are there new features in engineered viruses we are not being told about. The only thing lacking is an honest explanation that everything is being done to ensure those viruses are never introduced to the general public.

When we look at the communist track record we can’t help but think, there is a great possibility those viruses can and will be used as weapons. We know no one is going to make an announcement or post a warning. Given that fact we could say terrorist may have more morals than the average world leader today. With terrorists we stand a 50/50 chance they will deliver a warning and demand a ransom. With world leaders today, who knows.

We do see one sign that is rather frightening. Funding has dramatically increased in proportion to the deadly effects of each virus created in a laboratory. Not the humanitarian efforts grants were awarded to achieve. Today funding is directly linked to the dangers and effectiveness of those new super viruses. Remember, we are paying for all of this.

2021 Jun 5

Did covid-19 come from a lab?

We know that the first human cases that were detected were detected in Wuhan in December 2019,” he said. “We also know that this virus belongs to a group of viruses that have their original niche in bat populations. In between these two points, we don’t know much.”

On 23 May, The Wall Street Journal claimed that US intelligence has evidence of several employees of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which carries out research on bat coronaviruses, being hospitalised with a respiratory illness similar to covid-19 in November 2019. US President Joe Biden subsequently ordered the US intelligence community to pursue a definitive conclusion on whether the virus spilled naturally from a wildlife reservoir, or from a lab.

The origin of the virus remains one of the most important unknowns of the pandemic. “We need to know where it came from,” says David Robertson, an evolutionary virologist at the University of Glasgow, UK. “We have to be worried that that could happen again.”

Last month, Science published a letter from 18 distinguished scientists, which argued that theories of accidental lab release and so-called zoonotic spillover (where an infectious disease jumps from an animal to a human) “both remain viable”.

The leak scenario involves researchers tinkering around with a virus, perhaps in gain of function experiments in which pathogens are modified to be more harmful in a bid to understand them better. This modified virus then somehow slipped through the lab’s biosafety net, which has been criticised by many for being full of holes.

For example, the virus has a “furin cleavage site”, a part of the spike protein that helps it to break into host cells. Many coronaviruses have this, but SARS-CoV-2 is the only member of its sub-genus Sarbecovirus to have one.

Another region of the spike protein, the “receptor binding motif”, appears to be oddly adapted to latch on to human cells. This adaptation was also observed in the original SARS virus, SARS-CoV-1, but only long after it had jumped to humans. The Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 had it from the get-go.

These and other molecular peculiarities are consistent with a virus that has been manipulated in the laboratory, says Segreto.

We can find hundreds of articles telling us where covid-19 originated and each one has its own theory on how the virus escaped a lab. We do have one fact we need to keep in mind. Science has been able to identify the origin of viruses for over 400 years. Covid-19 is the first virus in human history where science claims they cannot identify its origin. Where are scientists looking? Science has been testing every animal, bird, fish, plant, and mold known to mankind. We know all that testing came up with no answer. Bats are close, but not close enough to close the door on the issue. Then we have governments all over the world telling us not to worry. Add to that media going to great lengths to throw a cover on every question. When we add it all up what do we have? It appears we are left with one other area to look. The virus leaked from a lab somewhere in China. Was it on purpose of by accident? If China releases a new bio-weapon on Taiwan, I think we have an answer.

We also know the origin of SARS 2002-2004 was not discovered until 2017. It took 13 years to uncover that connection. The major difference between 2004 and 2020 is, 2004 did not have dozens of laboratories all over the world producing super viruses. 2004 also had a host of investigative reports. Fatalities in 2004 were over 8000. Covid-19 has claimed over 5 million lives. Is it a coincidence the SARS virus muted to such a deadly virus on its own or was covid-19 a product of science?

We need to take the threat we see today seriously. We also have to keep in mind, there is not one communist country who trusts another communist country. You would think history and the condition of the world today would wake people up. We see growing numbers of communists all over the world. Since turning to computerized elections, communists have taken key positions in governments all over the world. A few years ago open communists would have quickly ended their political carrier. Today communists are open and brazen. Immediately after the 2020 election in the US, communists came out of the closet. Some calling for the round up and elimination of all conservatives. For some reason communists seemed to have no fear of loosing their elected positions. There has to be a reason those people feel safe to voice their radically insane opinions. What do they know that gives them this new found courage? How deep is their control of elections?

When we see how deadly those viruses developed in laboratories can be, we see how important our vote is today. The last thing we need in office is radical thinking people saying they need to eliminate people who don’t agree with them. Common sense tells us, it is only a matter of time before they use those viruses against people they view as enemies. And radicals view the majority of the world as enemies.

How bad is this getting? Reports tells us about the Chinese testing covid variants on the Uyghur population.

Link to purchase paperback book
Link to purchase paperback book

24 August 2020

Death is Everywhere’

Millions More Uyghurs Missing

In extraordinary detail, he describes how Government authorities are not only testing COVID-19 vaccines on detainees, but also from the population identified for indoctrination.

Since the Coronavirus started, the Chinese Government has been experimenting vaccines on the entire Uyghur population,” says Sidick. “Everywhere is locked down. There’s a big residential complex in Urumqi. Many hundreds of people live there in tall buildings, and the Government took one person from each family – altogether about 165 people – and quarantined them in a remote hospital, with one person in each room, and examined them every day.

A person from inside this facility told my source that authorities are taking blood twice per day for testing. They are given shots before they drink this Chinese medicine and then have to have an oral liquid test and also a blood test. What this is, is the Chinese authorities injected these people with the Coronavirus first, before they are given the vaccine. After they infected these people, they check on the results to see if the vaccine worked or not. I heard this directly from several people who have their family members there. These are all young people, 18, 19, 20 years or age. They didn’t experiment on old people.”

October 12, 2021

Uyghurs Suffering Horrific Healthcare Violations

Crimes against Uyghurs go way beyond testing covid variants.

One of these women, Mihrigul Tursun, spoke up against the cruel treatment of Uyghur Muslims and the several violations of ethical and healthcare rights by the Chinese government. In 2018, Tursun spoke at the Congressional Executive Commission on China in Washington D.C. She was imprisoned and her triplet children were taken away from her.

She experienced multiple beatings, electric shocks, forced injections, and was forced to take other medications. One of her children died at the camp and the other two survived, but have scars on their necks due to the feeding tube that was inserted.

I would rather die than go through this torture. I begged them to kill me,” Tursun said.

When we see one country using covid to carry out genocide on a group they decided to eliminate, we know the thought and plans exist. When we look at history we see a rather shocking similarity. In 1936 Nazi Germany hosted the Olympics while rounding up and murdering millions. Today history repeats itself in China. We cannot make the mistake of thinking genocide in Germany or China was or is restricted to a single religious group. That is exactly what radicals carrying out genocide want the world to believe. They want us to believe we don’t face the same threat. When Germany invaded Poland, the Nazis assassinated every politician, police officer, teachers, and most of the soldiers who surrendered. The Nazis enslaved the rest. Religion had little to do with the genocide the Nazis carried out. The Nazis viewed Poles as subhuman and convinced themselves it was their duty to kill and rule everyone in Poland and other countries. I was told, my entire family was lost to the Nazis in WWII and the Russians after WWII. We’ve seen how genocide is shared by socialists and communists and they never planned at stopping at a single race or religion. We are facing much worse today and sad to say, the socialists and communists already occupy key positions in governments all over the world. WWII also showed us, socialist and communists never trusted one another and it is each of their goals to totally eliminate the other. Do a little research on how Nazis treated Russian soldiers and how Russia treated German soldiers. Then try and tell me the genocide in WWII was restricted to Jews.

26 January 2022

COVID-19 lab leak theory

The COVID-19 lab leak theory proposes that SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic) originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.[1][2] Central to the theory is the observation that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) is in the same city as the pandemic’s earliest known outbreak and from suspicions about the secretiveness of the Chinese government’s response.[3][4] Scientists from WIV had previously collected SARS-related coronaviruses from bats; allegations that they also performed undisclosed risky work on such viruses is central to some versions of the idea.[5][6] Some versions, particularly those alleging alteration of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, are based on speculation,[7] misinformation,[8] or misrepresentations of scientific evidence.

The idea that the virus was released from a laboratory (accidentally or deliberately) appeared early in the pandemic.[11][12] The theory gained popularity in America through promotion by conservative figures including president Donald Trump and other members of the Republican Party in the spring of 2020,[13] fomenting tensions between the US and China.[14] Many in American liberal media and political circles subsequently dismissed it as a conspiracy theory.

The fact that covid-19 has become a political platform serves a purpose. It allows the media to take one side or the other and report nothing but a series of senseless allegations against the opposing group that accomplish nothing. In stead of investigating the subject at hand, news agencies dream up new stories to focus on senseless details that do nothing to inform the general public about what is really happening and the threats that exist in real life. News agencies are not like those of 10 or 20 years ago when they reported the facts and allowed individuals to decide how they were going to view the subject at hand.

Today, what we don’t see on the news is more important and tells us more about the world we live in than the thousands of news stories posted on the the Internet and spread over the airwaves. Attacking the other group will never solve a problem. All attacks do is bring in incredible sums of ad revenue and sad to say, that is where the media focuses today.

Why don’t we see stories about what the Uyghurs are suffering in China today? Why don’t we read stories about the reports filed on government websites explaining new variants developed in laboratories? How come no one is looking into the timing of those new variants and outbreaks in China with the same symptoms? How come no one in the media or the government is looking at the obvious connections between variants developed in laboratories and covid cases that suddenly popped up in isolated regions in China? Not once but six times.

Media outlets are either for or against the vaccines. But neither one of them investigate the facts to show the benefits and draw backs those vaccines have. All we hear on the news is personal opinions supporting their stance. Opinions that do no one any good.

The world faces dangers we never saw before. Governments have control of viruses more deadly than anyone every imagined. Billions of dollars are invested in more deadly viruses and as we have seen, science is at a loss to develop effective and safe vaccines. All of this in a time when we see radical factions taking office positions in government and gaining control. Some of those political factions are no longer afraid to show their support for radial extremists. Look at Afghanistan. How did Afghanistan fall in a number of days and why were billions of dollars in military arms left behind? Why has the media dropped the subject so quickly? Why do the thousand of people left behind in Afghanistan no longer matter? What we don’t see on the news tells us more about the condition of this world than what we are spoon fed everyday. We know news and editing go together. They have been one of the same for generations. We’ve been through enough in our generation to know when we get the message, “nothing to see here,” we know something is up. Something the powers in charge don’t want us to see.

August 2021

The Origins of Covid-19

The House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff has continued to investigate the origins of

COVID-19, examining new information as it became available, including through expert testimony.

Based on the material collected and analyzed by the Committee Minority Staff, the preponderance of evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally released from a Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory sometime prior to September 12, 2019.

This report investigates the origin of this virus and looks at how it became a deadly pandemic.

We also believe the preponderance of the evidence proves the virus did leak from the WIV and that it did so sometime before September 12, 2019.

This is based upon multiple pieces of evidence laid out in the report, including:

  • The sudden removal of the WIV’s virus and sample database in the middle of the

night on September 12, 2019 and without explanation;

  • Safety concerns expressed by top PRC scientists in 2019 and unusually scheduled

maintenance at the WIV;

  • Athletes at the Military World Games held in Wuhan in October 2019 who

became sick with symptoms similar to COVID-19 both while in Wuhan and also

shortly after returning to their home countries;

  • Satellite imagery of Wuhan in September and October 2019 that showed a

significant uptick in the number of people at local hospitals surrounding the WIV’s

headquarters, coupled with an unusually high number of patients with symptoms

similar to COVID-19;

  • The installation of a People’s Liberation Army’s bioweapons expert as the head of

the WIV’s Biosafety Level 4 lab (BSL-4), possibly as early as late 2019; and

  • Actions by the Chinese Communist Party and scientists working at or affiliated

with the WIV to hide or coverup the type of research being conducted at there.

This report also lays out ample evidence that researchers at the WIV, in conjunction with U.S.

scientists and funded by both the PRC government and the U.S. government, were conducting gainof-function research on coronaviruses at the WIV, at times under BSL-2 conditions. Much of this research was focused on modifying the spike protein of coronaviruses that could not infect humans so they could bind to human immune systems.

The Cover-Up

In the original report, we laid out many of the ways the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) went to great lengths to cover up the initial epidemic, and how their cover-up likely turned what could have been a local outbreak into a global pandemic. The CCP detained doctors in order to silence them, and disappeared journalists who attempted to expose the truth. They destroyed lab samples, and hid the fact there was clear evidence of human-to-human transmission. And they still refuse to allow a real investigation into the origins. At the same time, the WHO, under Director General Tedros, failed to warn the world of the impending pandemic. Instead, he parroted CCP talking points, acting as a puppet of General Secretary Xi.

Thank God we have a few moral people in the right place. I don’t think anyone expects to see anything done with the information brought to light. We all expect all that information to be swept under the rug. Since the election we’ve seen one distraction after another. Hilary lived under the concept of creating a deception before moving forward on a plan. In plain simple English, accuse someone of a crime before you commit the crime. Distractions are a way of life and the life blood of politics today. When Hilary cries, “Russian collusion,” look at her ties with Russia or another world power. When we saw people accusing police of being the root of racism, we saw how that group jumped onto social media to raise funds to bail out criminals. Then we saw laws changed to eliminate bail. We saw criminals released with small bail amounts or no bail at all. Then the obvious happened. Crime soared. Criminals released on bail returned to the streets to commit more serious crimes including murder. News is filled with stories about criminals with long records released within hours and eventually adding murder to their resume. We only hear about the most serious crimes. Usually when they shoot an officer. Then we have a carrier criminal in Wisconsin released on bail who decided to run people over at a Christmas parade. This was all started by a group of people who claimed police officers were racist and a handful of politicians who supported their cause. That is only one example showing how a bad idea and rumors never lead to anything good. It shows that what appears to be a poor plan, or lack of a plan is actually a well conceived plan with hundreds of people involved. Each doing their job. Each aware of where the plan is leading. Which makes each of them guilty of all the crimes committed. They all have blood on their hands.

We lack the news media to put this all together. We learn from history by looking back and seeing obvious patterns. You don’t have to be a scientist to put the sequence of events together and clearly see what is happening and what their radical common goal is. And where it is leading. Eliminating police forces shows who those radical politicians have been working with. Government working with crime figures is nothing new. We saw it in the 1920’s and 1930’s. What we see is nothing new.

When we look at the technology law enforcement had to work with in 1930 and what they were able to accomplish we have to ask why law enforcement today is not able to accomplish far more. With all the funds, equipment, and technology used by law enforcement today, why do criminals basically have free reign? How can a man produce a video about mass killing and a DA in Wisconsin releases him on a $1000 bond? How can Epstein island operate without raising a number of red flags? Why did the court go out of their way to protect the criminal’s privacy during Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial? Why do criminals have more rights than the victims? With today’s technology there should be no problem bringing more than enough evidence to identify and convict the people who visited that island.

When we look at the southern border today, we have more questions than answers. Who is crossing the border and why? Dozens of people on the terrorist watch list have been arrested, Some after committing crimes, including murdering police officers. Once again, we only hear a small portion of the news. What we don’t hear about the people crossing the border is raising awareness. What is not explained is raising concern. Dozens of videos have surfaced showing hundreds of illegal immigrants flown all over the country in the middle of the night. The administration refuses to answer any questions. Which of course raises red flags. Are drugs also on those planes? Where are those immigrants going? What are they being used for? We are fed a steady diet to make us think, those immigrants are only tied into future elections. Is that the latest in a long line of distractions? Hunter Biden has relationships with people controlling large and sophisticated prostitution rings, human trafficking, slavery, and organ harvesting. Hunter was introduced to those factions when he was a director on the board of Burisma. Joe Biden knew who those people were. Joe Biden directed US funds in Ukraine’s election to ensure organized crime occupied key political positions. Many of those people both in political office and on Burisma’s board are now serving prison sentences.

After the election, Pelosi accused Trump of planning to take over the government and refuse to leave office. We have to ask where Pelosi came up with that idea. Was Pelosi aware of a plan in action to take over the government and cease power? When we see radical politicians call for the arrest and execution of people in the opposing party, we have to ask if that was a slip up and were they exposing plans that weren’t supposed to go public at that time. When we see what has happened leading into and after the election, we can’t help but be alarmed. Joe Biden warned, “you are going to need F15s and nukes to over throw this government.” Today that administration has dozens of lethal viruses at their disposal. It seems rather unlikely for a single celled virus to hatch a plan and mutate so it can spread more efficiently, and pose the same same threats as nerve agents. Are we really supposed to believe a single cell virus was able to put together such a plan and limit their attack to the human race? To date covid-19 has not posed a threat to any animals, birds, or any species on this planet. Covid-19 has been restricted to humans as if it was a plan. Today we are in danger of being threatened by our government or another government. In a second we can be held ransom with the threat of releasing a deadly virus able to wipe out human life. We’ve seen threats from terrorists using bio-weapons. Imagine a threat from a government with world conquest as a goal. Or a government facing the threat of loosing power. That threat exists today. It is not being talked about or covered like it should be. And that should make us all nervous.

January 25, 2022

A lab assistant involved in COVID-19 research in Taiwan exposed 110 people after becoming infected at work

A premiere Taiwanese academic institution will pay the equivalent of $5,400 in fines after reporting that a lab worker had been infected by SARS-CoV-2 while conducting research on the delta strain of the virus. The lab assistant left her lab and exposed 110 close contacts to the disease. According to Science, the case marks what is likely the first verified instance of a researcher being infected by the virus in lab.

Taiwan’s health minister, Chen Shih-chung, announced the fine at a press conference. The Central Epidemic Command Center reported that the worker, who is vaccinated and in her 20s, became symptomatic on Nov. 26, before testing positive. She handled infected animals and may have inhaled the virus after removing her protective equipment in the wrong order, mask first, according to Science. At the time, Taiwan was reporting no local transmission of COVID-19, and sequencing showed that the lab worker had been infected by a strain given to the lab at Academic Sinica, which was conducting drug and vaccine research.

With news today it is nearly impossible to tell what is fact and what has been fabricated as a distraction. We know China is hosting the 2022 Olympics and needs to distract from issues like covid-19, their laboratories, crimes against the Uyghurs, slave labor, trade, and a host of other issues. Human trafficking and human trade associated with North Korea are subjects we have not looked into. Add to that the help China has given North Korea to develop nuclear weapons. The fact China could drive all the nuclear weapons across the border, but chose to send North Korea materials, equipment, and technology so they could build their own missiles raises a few questions. Why take the slow road with North Korea spending all that time and money to basically start from scratch when all the missiles they need are on the other side of the river? It spells another distraction the Chinese can milk for a long time. As if they knew what was on the agenda and knew they needed a list of distractions.

People wanted answers, so why not fabricate one. China is not about to take the heat and the last thing they need is attention focused on any of their laboratories. So why not use a laboratory in Taiwan? It serves multiple purposes. It distracts us from China, provides an answer, and places doubts in Taiwan. A country China just happens to plan on invading. Is this story intended to make China look like the good guy charging in on a white horse to save the world? Something to consider.

Reports on a laboratory leak in Taiwan shows us, there are more countries developing lethal viruses than we can imagine. We would have never heard about virus research in Taiwan if it wasn’t for a report on that leak. How many other countries are involved? How advanced is Taiwan’s research? It only took a few weeks for one lab to take covid-19 and turn it into a nerve agent. Did Taiwan develop a similar variant? This paints a dim future for this world when we look at the big picture. Since the election in 2020, China has been threatening Taiwan with an invasion. What is holding China back? We would be fools is we believed China didn’t know Taiwan has labs developing virus strains. In the nuclear world we know there is this balance of power. In simple terms, the ability to destroy the world 100 times guarantees our safety. That has spread into viruses. The only difference is, no one is talking about it. The threat does exist. The news doesn’t want to discuss the issue. Governments want to keep it a secret. There is more than enough information about killer viruses on the Internet. Much of that information is on official government websites. So why is it being ignored. Is this the silence before the storm?

January 21, 2020

How Much Should The Public Be Told About Research Into Risky Viruses?

U.S. officials are weighing the benefits and risks of proposed experiments that might make a dangerous pathogen even worse — but the details of that review, and the exact nature of the experiments, aren’t being released to the public.

Those in favor of this virus tinkering say it’s necessary to prepare for the possibility that an animal pathogen circulating out in nature might mutate in a way that lets it start sickening humans and spreading widely. It’s not a theoretical danger; past pandemics, like the 1918 flu, killed millions.

Other biosecurity experts, however, question how much useful knowledge would really be gained from these studies. And in their view, it just isn’t worth the possibility that a lab-created virus might get unleashed — either by accident or because someone deliberately used it as a bioweapon.

Of course there is a limit to how much knowledge is shared. The American public accepts that fact and when dealing with government agencies, has accepted that fact. The average American can tell when information has been edited for security reasons and accepts that fact. The problem is, the current administration looks at the entire American public as idiots, unable to understand when they are being lied to. Every parent will tell you how they can figure out when their children are lying. As if that is a built in natural human instinct. That explains why this administration has labeled parents as a major threat to their form of government.

When Hitler marched into Poland, he eliminated all the politicians, educators, and of course everyone in the military. In Hitler’s speeches, he claimed Polish people were an inferior race. So he eliminated all the educated Poles in order to prove his theory and keep his war machine moving. As Hitler progressed across Europe, he repeated the same process over and over again.

When we see an administration that treats the people they represent like children, we see the same concepts developed by Hitler taking shape in our generation. When we take a look at what has happened in major cities across America over the past 10 or 20 years, we begin to see how plans were laid long before we could put facts together to see what the ultimate goal was.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Covid Military Ties

No one really wants to look at ties between the military and viruses. That is a subject we prefer to ignore based on the fact, the outcome is far beyond our imagination and only leads to the end of life as we know it. We’ve seen governments use military power against the people who occupied the country they wanted to conquer. Visions of Pol Pot’s killing fields comes to mind along with the millions who died after WWII at the hands of Russia, and China’s communist take over that killed millions more. Visions of those atrocities have shown how everyone looses everything they worked for and dreamed about. Every dream of freedom is crushed. Millions were rounded up and sent to reeducation camps where they basically starved to death. History has shown how communists systematically eliminated a large portion of the population. That section of the population always consists of the political wing of the population, the educational portion of the population, the former military, and of course, business owners and the majority of the middle class. No one wants to linger on the thought of loosing everything and no one wants to dwell on the idea of living their last moments of life in a concentration camp waiting to die.

Few of us have experienced a concentration camp. Stories from the few who have escaped those camps rarely make the headlines. The stories tell a tale of starvation, torture, and executions. Camps being run and managed by people with no conscience. People who appear to enjoy their work and lie awake at night imagining new ways to make people suffer before they die. No one wants to linger on the thought of entering a living hell. So we ignore it.

What led to the fall of those countries? History is a look back at what events took place to set up the fall of each of those countries. What those leaders had to do. What they had to have in place to take over. And how each of them were able to convince enough people to follow them into the living hell they planned to create.

Concentration camps were never an after thought for any of those corrupt and sinister leaders. Those camps were planned long before they put their plans into action. But first, they needed people to run those camps. People conditioned to do what few people are capable of doing. People capable of inflicting pain and suffering on human beings at a level few of us can imagine. What makes such a person? What makes a person want to turn on fellow human beings and make them suffer? What turns a man into a mass murderer convinced their actions are for the good of the people?

I don’t want to pretend to be a psychologist, but I have seen enough happening in the political arena to raise a few red flags. To raise a few questions that need a thorough investigation.

Years ago I did live in the City of Milwaukee. Back in those days I was awaken every Friday and Saturday night at 2 or 3 in the morning by the sound of gun shots in the distance. When bars closed, gun shots erupted all over the city and sirens blared. That was life in the big city. One summer night on a Saturday after midnight shouting in the backyard woke me up. I saw 2 guys all dressed in black and a woman outside. Shouts of, “shut up,” and “give me your purse,” led me to believe there was a hold up in progress outside my window. I grabbed my bow, loaded an arrow with a hunting tip, went to the window, pulled back, and shouted, “get the hell out of here.” I called 911 and reported the robbery. I got dressed and went outside to comfort the victim. I saw a, I couldn’t tell if it was a boy or a girl. He looked like a boy but dressed like a girl. I made sure she was alright and told her the police were on the way. She didn’t want to talk to the police. But I kept her there until the police arrived. As usual, after police arrived gun shots rang out a few blocks away at the bar when it closed. I wanted to ask the police what that was all about but didn’t feel that was appropriate. Listening to the victim talk to the police, I learned one of the men in black had a gun. I stood there thinking, holding a bow on a guy with a gun was not the smartest things I’ve ever done. I had this deep feeling God was there to protect me.

The next day a detective came to interview me. I was in the Army Reserves and served with a number of police officers. Some of them were in charge of training in the police force and identifying suspects was one of the classes they reviewed with us. Since we were instructors in the Army, reviewing those classes was only natural and a great way to get professional feedback. I described the suspects down to the letter including their black shoes that lacked any form of reflective inserts common in those days. The detective had a rather good idea who they were and shared some information about gang activity in the area.

The following night I heard people behind the house and went outside to investigate. A few of the neighbors got together and decided enough was enough. Neighbors gathered outside in a show of unity. Dozens of us hung out outside in the middle of the night to watch over the neighborhood. We talked. I learned a bit about the victim. He was adopted by a lesbian couple down the street who decided to adopt a boy and change him into a girl.

The victim often walked past my house and on occasion we sat and chatted. The stories she told me I never in my life expected to hear. She shared her confusion and pain at levels I never knew existed. I didn’t really think that much about it at the time. One person was a victim of someone’s political or cultural goals. They made up their minds to use a baby boy to make their point to the world and never considered the emotional suffering that boy would have to suffer his entire life. Years later I realized how gender identity was being used as a weapon.

In 2021 and 2022 gender identity has come out of the closet. The airwaves and Internet are filled with stories about teachers and others encouraging children to undergo sex changes, Not that any of those reporters or school teachers are trained to deal with the psychological trauma involved in a sex change. I can assure you, they never experienced it first hand. If they had heard about the suffering that victim had to live through, they would immediately withdraw their statements and let the experts deal with it.

Certainly there are some people dealing with an identity and gender crisis. They deserve the best care and counseling available. They need help and deserve to pursue life, liberty, and happiness on the same level we all enjoy. But when we see teachers and politicians attempting to influence the minds of children to advance their political agendas, something has to be done. When we see members of congress passing laws and pumping billions of dollars of taxpayer funds into programs designed to introduce gender choices at grade school and kindergarten levels, we have to ask why. I have seen the confusion gender changes can cause. When we have government funding adding to that confusion, we are seeing problems created, not solved. But in 2021 we have seen a government that seems to pride itself on creating new problems.

Another issue we have seen is teen pregnancy, Which has been around for more than a generation. I’ve been involved with a number of church groups and organizations dedicated to solving the teen pregnancy issue. One of the biggest problems is children growing up without a father. I’ve attended seminars for fathers who seldom or never saw their children. I’ve seen grown men with jail house tattoos and bulging muscles breakdown and cry when they shared the guilt of not being a part of their child’s life. I sat at tables with those men hanging in every word as I told them about the time I spent with my dad. How he taught me to work on cars and taught be about fractions using sockets and wrenches long before I learned how to add and subtract. Those men clung to every word when I told them about our fishing trips, and how I used to polish my dad’s combat boots before he left for an Army Reserve meeting. I never knew how good I had it until I shared my life with groups of men who lived a life knowing something was missing, but no one ever explained what that something was and how simple it was to correct. Those men lived in fear thinking if they took one step forward and made one mistake, it would make matters worse. So they remained locked up and secluded, away from their family. They may have made it out of the jail cell, but they were still trapped by the prison created by people who convinced them, they could never be the perfect father, so why try. They never realized their children weren’t expecting the perfect father. All they wanted was someone to hold them, to be there for them. Their children just wanted to feel what it was like to be normal.

Being a parent is a natural thing. God never gave Adam and Eve an instruction manual. Everything they needed was part of the breath of life from God’s mouth. Adam and Eve were never perfect parents. Their first born son killed his younger bother. Few parents suffer such a dramatic set back. But that didn’t stop Adam and Eve from trying. As soon as sin reared its ugly head, we were doomed to making mistakes as parents. All of us make mistakes. We cannot allow that fear to hold us back.

I attended city hall meetings. Sometimes as part of a group to help support those groups and sometimes as an individual to introduce plans to deal with teen pregnancy. The problem and solutions were obvious. We lived in a society where children were raising children and had no idea how to raise a child. We had to educate the children having babies. We had to develop programs for the mothers to finish school and make a life for themselves and their families. We had to give them self esteem and learn how to contribute to society. We had to teach teenage mothers how to develop a sense of pride, self respect, and what love and dedication really were.

I heard city officials turn down one plan after another, introducing their own plans. Which was to give single mothers and their babies money. Nothing else but money. City officials wanted everyone to believe money was the key to solve all the problems. The fact of that matter was, single mothers fueled the problems in major cities. Babies without fathers grew up to be easy targets for gangs, drug dealers, and pimps. The problems ballooned. Taxpayer funds poured into teen pregnancy fueled the problems to a point it appears it is out of control.

Taking a few figures it is not difficult to see, many of the people in this nation considered poor actually have a larger income than many of the working middle class. Figure $800 per month per child. Four children comes to $3200 per month. That comes out to $38,400 per year. More than the average working American makes. Add to that welfare, food stamps, rent assistance, heat and electricity and what do we come up with? Roughly an additional $2000 per month. Which comes up to a total over $62,000 per year all tax free. All paid for by tax dollars.

The situation is compounded by the fact, many of those fatherless babies undergo a series of psychological studies which results in labeling them as disabled. They become adults and are shifted over to Social Security disability. The average retired person who paid into Social Security their entire life receives an average of $1400 a month, $16,800 annually. No one ever talks about the fact, teen pregnancy can pay more than three times what the average retired person makes in a year.

Housing is another issue I have run across. It is not unusual for a city to accumulate a number of tax foreclosure properties. Most of those properties are run down, in need of repair, and in some cases past the point of repair. I have toured a number of those properties and written more offers to purchase those properties than I care to count. It did not take long to see a pattern develop. The city counsel authorizes every sale on tax foreclosed properties. For the most part, properties in decent shape never seem to be sold to the general public. Some are sold to charitable organizations. Others are sold to undisclosed buyers. I have a tendency to look up a few properties after they have been sold to see what price they were sold for and to whom. A strange pattern surrounded tax forecloses. Public records showed no records on previous sales on city owned tax foreclosures. Which is rather odd. Anyone can look at public records and see when a property was sold and at what price it was sold. Appraisers use that information. But on a number of tax forecloses that information was deleted.

A number of tax foreclosures come back on the market for resale. Buyers are supposed to sign a contract with the city agreeing not to sell the property for a number of years. But a few of them come back on the market in a matter of months. And some years later. Visit enough of those properties and look at enough information and another pattern developed. For years, tax foreclosures have been purchased by city officials. In most cases those properties are used as rental investments. Most times the properties are registered under an LLC and at times under the name of city officials.

The city may have turned down a number of plans to solve teen pregnancy problems, but they did establish a number of agencies to distribute funds. One of those agencies deals with rent assistance. Families and individuals are placed in housing and the agency delivers a check to the landlord every month. It seems fair. Until we look at where those programs are run and who is housed in those rental properties.

Mayor Lightfoot in Chicago came short of declaring a civil war when she found out ICE had plans of going into Chicago to arrest a long list of illegal immigrants with criminal records. Mayor Lightfoot felt it was her duty to defend and protect those criminals at all costs? What was behind her motives? Chicago has a long history of housing illegal immigrants. Their rent is paid for by county agencies established to pay rent for low income families. That rent assistance expanded to illegal immigrants. I am sure Chicago taxpayers voted for that humanitarian aid and were pleased to see their taxes double as long as it was for a good cause.

When we look at concerted efforts to support underprivileged people, many people are willing to accept what concerned politicians have scripted. Which is the side of the story politicians want people to believe. Not the whole truth, but select details designed to make those politicians look like heroes. There are also people who question their motives. As time marches on obvious signs come to light showing how politicians profit from the poor and needy. The majority of us call it a conflict of interest when we see politicians investing in rental properties and establishing agencies to ensure how much they are paid as well as how and when they are paid rents. When we see politicians paid a few hundred thousands of dollars a year in salary enter office in the middle class and in a few short years showing fortunes the average person dreams about, most people begin to ask questions and take a long look at the facts and events that enriched politicians. Purchasing rental properties and controlling agencies that pay the rent are one such example. Stock investments is another. But plans go much deeper than that. The goal is to hang onto power at all cost. When we begin to link those actions to well known historical events other patterns emerge. A few of those events are related to a number of communist take overs. Venezuela is one story we could look at. When we compare what has happened in 2021 we see an accelerated version of what happened in Venezuela, starting with the voting machines and progressing to inflation and supply problems. Communists have relied on a simple system. Reduce jobs, interrupt the supply chain, introduce record inflation, and convince simple minded people they cannot survive without the government. Their base is established. One of the most vicious take overs was in Cambodia. A comparison of the Cambodian communist take over and events we experience today show the makings of either the best science fiction or horror movie ever produced.

AUG 21, 2018

Pol Pot

Pol Pot was a political leader whose communist Khmer Rouge government led Cambodia from 1975 to 1979. During that time, an estimated 1.5 to 2 million Cambodians died of starvation, execution, disease or overwork. One detention center, S-21, was so notorious that only seven of the roughly 20,000 people imprisoned there are known to have survived. The Khmer Rouge, in their attempt to socially engineer a classless communist society, took particular aim at intellectuals, city residents, ethnic Vietnamese, civil servants and religious leaders. Some historians regard the Pol Pot regime as one of the most barbaric and murderous in recent history.

Pol Pot

Cambodian political leader

The son of a landowning farmer, Saloth Sar was sent at age five or six to live with an elder brother in Phnom Penh, where he was educated in a French curriculum. A mediocre student, he failed the entrance examinations for high school and so instead studied carpentry for a year at a technical school in Phnom Penh. In 1949 he went to Paris on a scholarship to study radio electronics. There he became involved with the French Communist Party and joined a group of young left-wing Cambodian nationalists who later became his fellow leaders in the Khmer Rouge. In France he spent more time on revolutionary activities than on his studies. His scholarship was cut short after he failed examinations, and he returned to Phnom Penh in 1953.

Pol Pot was not a well educated man by any stretch of the imagination. He was able to emerge as a communist party leader in a country where civil war was a part of life and a number of communist factions fought for control. There as one thing about Pol Pot we need to pay attention to. Pol Pot was a teacher and learned the fundamentals of education which he used to mold his image of a perfect society.

When we look at influences in the education system today, we can’t help but draw parallels between Pol Pot and the course a small number of radical teachers are taking in public school systems. Add in the inflation problem we have been undergoing in 2021 and 2022 and we can see why the world’s most successful economy has quickly turned into the economy Pol Pot was able to work within. Pol Pot was successful because jobs as well as food was scarce. That poor economy naturally opened up recruiting opportunities for Pol Pot. When we look at the open border policy plaguing the US in 2021 and 2022 we see on influx of potential recruits Pol Pot would be proud of. Pol Pot used his own version of open borders. Recruiting and using immigrants is not an original idea. Today open borders in the US serve two major goals. A reliable source of income for politicians who have invested in rental properties and a source of people with nothing to loose, easily influenced by the same promises made by Pol Pot. We’ve seen a number of those promises surface in 2021. Free healthcare, free education, housing, and transportation are a few. The promise of $450,000 per immigrant shocked the majority of Americans. When we saw free crack pipes, the pieces of the puzzle fell into place.

Events before the election in 2020 showed other issues of concern. Groups like antifa and BLM took the spotlight. Funds poured in from major companies no one in their wildest dreams ever expected to see associated with socialists or communist movements. Antifa could not wait to show the world their organization and dedication to over throw any and all democratic systems. Antifa operates worldwide and invested a lot of time, energy, and funds into their organization. They openly displayed their militant form and were obviously a pawn in the 2020 election campaign. Although not a real power or threat, the support they received from key politicians will never be forgotten.

BLM was another group used during the 2020 campaign. BLM openly boasted about their ties to Marxism. After the election they proved they are trained Marxists. After receiving billions of dollars in donations, the leaders are rich, and all of their followers are poor. Proving they follow the Marxist system to the letter.

There are a few details about those organizations we need to pay particular attention to. If viruses are to be successful, there has to be an organized effort to spread the virus. Studies have shown the most effective way to spread viruses is from human to human.

During the riots of 2020 one detail was evident. The masses were organized in a handful of major cities. Tactics never seen before suddenly showed up in one city then showed up in other cities days or weeks later. Mass car thefts from car lots is one example. Organized mass thefts from small businesses is another example. Rioters openly communicated using social media to schedule mass looting meeting points and quickly move those masses from one location to the next staying one step ahead of police. The same social media sites that cast a blind eye at organized looting went out of their way to censor anything and everything that did not agree with their agenda.

How large were those groups in 2020 and who is behind organizing them? The majority of what we saw in 2020 was smoke and mirrors designed to make it appear law abiding citizens were in the minority. A number of news stories and videos posted on the Internet showed how groups were bused from city to city. The US never had to deal with outstanding numbers of militants. It was a small group of hardcore militants bused from city to city joined by people in the city holding peaceful protests the militants infiltrated, turning them into violent riots. Arrest records showed the same people arrested in a number of cities across the country.

In hindsight we can see how those small organized groups would make the perfect source to launch an attack using viruses as a bioweapon. Using viruses as a bioweapon has its drawbacks. A virus distributed in the open air can’t be successful at this point. Virus cells survive at specific temperatures. Sunlight and open air kills the majority of virus cells. Virus cells are only able to travel short distances. Viruses need a human host to survive and spread.

During the riots in 2020 bus routes have been established and the left now has enough information to determine routes and timing. The same people used to organized peaceful protests can be used as a second level to spread a virus. The fact of the matter is, we are not going to run out of scenarios when we consider the possibility of the treat of bioweapons. We need to take a look at where we are today and what is being done. News out of Canada in February 2022 is painting a bleak picture. Hundreds of truckers organized a protest and have requested meetings with the people they elected. So far elected officials have refused to talk to the people who elected them and are paying their wages. The actions taken by the Canadian government have an eerie parallel to actions taken by the king of England against patriots in Boston in 1775. Canada shows the world how governments are avoiding discussions and the release of information on the virus.

In the US we see problems with school systems. School boards hold regularly scheduled meetings. Or used to. When parents began showing up to speak about about closed schools and mask mandates, the government branded concerned parents as radical threats. Schools have been teaching basically the same education format established and introduced by Pol Pot designed to put a wedge between children and their parents. No one really wants to review what Pol Pot did to his education system, but he separated children from their parents. His trusted squad of teachers brainwashed children to turn them against their parents. Pol Pot more than crossed the line. To prove their loyalty, children had to torture and murder adults. Nothing like that was ever seen in the world before Pol Pot or since. Then suddenly tactics introduced in the communist state of Cambodia suddenly surfaced in the US and all over the world. And government officials act surprised when they see parents raise a voice.

People have been demanding answers. School boards stopped holding public meetings. The administration dedicated billions of dollars to new law enforcement agencies to track and confront concerned parents. The Canadian government has refused to answer questions. The administration in the US has branded everyone who questions their ideas and actions as terrorists. We are just supposed to sit by quietly and watch all of this happen. Looking back on what we’ve seen over the past two years, it can be terrifying to look at the military connection with viruses and what could happen in the future.

January 13, 2022

Fauci Team Cared More about ‘International Harmony’ Than the Truth

Collins also undoubtedly knew — despite Fauci’s really strict, arguably to-the-point-of-misleading definition of gain-of-function research while speaking before Congress — that what Chinese scientists were doing was likely to fit most people’s definition of “gain of function research” — they were taking existing viruses and making them either more virulent, more contagious, or both. Collins and Fauci may or may not have known that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had ties to the Chinese military, and that WIV scientists had collaborated with Chinese military scientists on past coronavirus research.

However, Collins may not have known what the U.S. State Department knew — which is that American officials who visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2017 reported back to the U.S. State Department that the labs suffered from “a serious shortage of the highly trained technicians and investigators required to safely operate a [Biosafety Level] 4 laboratory.”

Either way, it is easy to envision Collins, and perhaps other U.S. officials, not wanting the world looking too closely at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, because any thorough investigation would uncover U.S. funding for EcoHealth Alliance’s work with the WIV. Even if SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin, that’s the sort of revelation that would generate substantial American public outrage. The world is dangerous enough without Chinese scientists, working in collaboration with the People’s Liberation Army, taking existing viruses and making them more threatening; learning that U.S. taxpayers helped pay for a portion of that work would add insult to injury.

One point is well made and pretty much common knowledge throughout the world. A handful of individuals control what the public hears and what they don’t hear. When dealing with a super virus, that thought is not only frustrating but terrifying. That is part of what the truckers in Canada have been protesting and when the government refuses to discuss the situation it only adds fuel to the fire.

When we see facts that don’t align, we do what is natural. We ask more questions. When we see politicians back track, we ask more questions. When we see the media push news with no reliable or qualified sources or references, we grow suspicious. That is only a natural reaction leaders should be prepared to deal with. No matter how bad the news may be, the general public demands an open forum and honest answers. That is all anyone is asking. When we see requests for information denied, we grow suspicious and when the human mind begins to wander, who knows what thoughts enter the mind of the average person.

It has been well documented, a number of conspiracy theories in 2019 and 2020 have proved to be true. When we experience mass censorship, the average person grows suspicious. The number of questions grow in the same proportion as the demand for answers. People will only go so far with less than adequate answers before a line is drawn in the sand. People realize, we weren’t the people who created the problems. When no one steps up to take responsibility, it turns into an invitation to point fingers.

In 2020 the world faced a pandemic. The president called in experts from all over the world, held meetings, then held news conferences with a number of experts who answered questions live on TV. The general public listened to a number of ideas, concepts, and plans. President Trump held news conferences and answered questions. Experts held news conferences and answered questions live on TV. Today we have a president in 2022 who comes on live TV, makes his speech, then turns his back on questions. Leaving a sour taste in the mouth of every concerned citizen. The difference in administrations is like night and day. Instead of a collection of experts on covid and viruses, we are left with one person, one opinion, and a person who says one thing one day, and contradicts himself a few days or weeks later. Dr. Fauci has proved to be less than a reliable source.

The White House press secretary is another brimming example. For over a year every question was answered with Jen Psaki’s patented, “I’ll have to circle back on that,” one answer fits all standard.

Question the administration and the response mirrors responses by countries living under military rule. In 2022 the Olympics are being held in China and we see live censorship along with other tactics we expect to see in countries controlled by the military. Then we take a step back, look at what is happening in the US, Canada, Australia, and other countries around the world and we can’t tell the difference between communist China and countries claiming to be democracies. When we get to that point, we need to look at what may possibly lie around the corner.

11 May 2021

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Documents obtained by the US State Department reportedly show People’s Liberation Army (PLA) commanders predicted that World War 3 would be fought with biological weapons. US officials obtained the papers which were written by military scientists and senior Chinese public health officials in 2015 as part of their own investigation into the origins of Covid-19. The editor-in-chief of the paper, Xu Dezhong, reported to the top leadership of the Chinese Military Commission and Ministry of Health during the SARS epidemic of 2003.

The Chinese military document “The Unnatural Origins of SARS and the New Species of Artificial Viruses as Genetic Biological Weapons” reads, ” “Following developments in other scientific fields, there have been major advances in the delivery of biological agents. For example, the new-found ability to freeze-dry micro-organisms has made it possible to store biological agents and aerosolise them during attacks.” Chinese scientists said the viruses could be “artificially manipulated into an emerging human ­disease virus, then weaponised and unleashed in a way never seen before”.

US President Joe Biden ordered aides to find answers to the origin of Covid-19, saying that US intelligence agencies are pursuing rival theories potentially including the possibility of a laboratory accident in China. Biden asked US intelligence agencies to report back within 90 days, and he told reporters on 27 May 2021 that he aimed to release their results publicly. The Democrat directed US national laboratories to assist with the investigation and the intelligence community to prepare a list of specific queries for the Chinese government. He called on China to cooperate with international probes into the origins of the pandemic. The work of tracing the origins of the coronavirus itself is difficult and complex, and there are many possibilities.

Study authors, British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr Birger Sorensen, claim Beijing manufactured the virus in a Wuhan lab and concealed it by “reverse engineering” its variants. The new study, obtained by the Daily Mail and due for publication soon in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery, alleges the “deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data” and says the authors have “prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China”. Dalgleish and Sorensen alleged that they noticed “unique fingerprints” in the coronavirus that suggest manipulation in a laboratory around a year ago but were rejected for publication by major scientific journals due to beliefs that the virus originated from a bat.

This is one of the most complete and comprehensive articles I have found on the Internet. I would suggest you read the entire article because it covers a variety of subjects related to covid-19. The author looks at the most important subjects and covers details from a variety of sources with views from different angles. I wish there were more articles like this and all journalists followed this format. If they did, we would not find ourselves in the mess we are in today.

The article begins with Senator Rand Paul questioning Dr Fauci where Dr Fauci comments, ““I don’t favor gain of function research in China and you are saying things that are not correct.” This book contains a number of links to official government papers showing Dr Fauci requesting grants for gain of function research as well as authorizing funds for gain of research. But in a way, Dr Fauci may be correct. We have not uncovered any forms, papers, or articles linking US funds to laboratories in China. A slight technicality Dr Fauci may be hindging on.

The article brings up a vary valid point. There is no separation between the Chinese government, military, and research laboratories. They are all controlled by the Chinese government. Which is an interesting point to consider when we look at our own government in the US. What are the ties between factions in the government with the military and research facilities? That is one detail we have not looked into and I doubt if we will find those sorts of links in public documents.

That article also goes into detail on laboratory security explaining precautions as well as procedures laboratories have to adhere to in a rating system created and enforced by the World Health Organization. The security measures are so tight, it would be almost impossible for any virus to escape on its own. Which casts doubt on the theory, the virus escaped the lab via human error in any way, shape or form. Which of course opens the door to the theory, the virus was intentionally released. When we consider the gain of function research requests with the mysterious viruses that showed up in China between 2013 and 2017, we see an obvious pattern. The viruses created in laboratories had unique features. The same unusual features that showed up under somewhat controlled conditions in isolated regions of China only weeks or months after studies were released about specific developments in viral research.

After reading that article, you cannot walk away without asking yourself why other reporters do not follow the same format and dedicate themselves to the same degree of research and study. Which is what the general public expects and deserves. Give us all the facts from every possible angle and let us develop our own personal views. Which has been all the world has been asking since news of covid-19 was first released. That article is one of the few examples of fair, honest, unbiased journalism on the Internet today.

The article identifies sources, studies, and a number of links for additional research. The article was written in plain, simple English so the average person can understand each of the subjects in detail. The article builds on timelines for the main laboratories in China as well as key laboratories in the US and other parts of the world. The author explains what research has been conducted on covid-19, bat viruses, as well are other viruses that would make covid-19 look like a picnic. The author knows, information is power. After reading that article you will begin to understand why the administration and media prefer people to wallow in ignorance. If people knew what has been happening behind the scenes, who is involved, and what those laboratories are capable of producing, the questions would never end.

The possibility of viruses used as bioweapons is also discussed highlighting China’s research and a number of papers and reports released. Some released by scientists involved in the research in China and later defecting.

When we think of links between the military and viral research, China, Russia, and a handful of other countries are the first to enter our mind. Most of the information on the Internet is of course made up of conspiracy theories with little to no evidence and few links to reliable sources. It could take forever to shift through all the information on the Internet before uncovering one article with a list of sources, studies, and links that could be considered reliable, concise, and unbiased. When we find such an article we need to review it a number of times, bookmark it, and return to it as we see reality unfold.

2021 Aug 3

COVID-19 Pandemic Origins: Bioweapons and the History of Laboratory Leaks

One microbe has just devastated our world. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of COVID-19, has shattered economies, upended patterns of life globally, and already killed >3.5 million people. More than 85 million cases were documented worldwide in <1 year,1 and many people want to know how this happened and where the virus originated. The first reports in late 2019 indicated that an epidemic caused by a zoonotic virus was spreading from Wuhan, China, believed to have been transmitted from an animal reservoir at a live-animal market. Speculation remains that the blame lies elsewhere, however, which seems surprising to scientists. For the public, the truth is easy to question because of the vast amounts of circulating misinformation.

On the surface, similarities exist between bioweapons and viral pandemics that may have allowed this conspiracy theory to seem plausible. As nonconventional, nonkinetic weapons of mass destruction, bioweapons can create the same havoc as pandemics. As with a pandemic, if a bioweapon attack spreads widely, healthcare systems could be overwhelmed, perpetuating societal panic as well as frustration, despair, and psychological casualties among healthcare workers, adding to the panic. This cycle would only change when a pathogen weakens or natural immunity is strengthened.

To remain unbiased, we need to look at covid-19 reports formulated to suppress and disprove theories supporting any possible leak from a laboratory either accidental or intentional.

Bioweapons have been in use for generations. “Ceramic bombs filled with plague-infested fleas that were used by Japan against a Chinese city during World War II” That type of information is rarely discussed. We could also go back to early American history when the British infected blankets with smallpox and gave them to Indians in the 1760’s. The colonists may have had reasons to revolt against British rule we aren’t supposed to know about.

The development of bioweapons goes way beyond our imagination. Then again, we have to learn to take news from what appears to be reliable sources with a host of evidence with that grain of salt and once again, look beyond that article using a bit of common sense.

It only sounds natural for the military to want a bomb that releases a virus on the enemy and either kills or disables them. But when we look at that concept with a sprinkle of common sense, a bomb turns out to be a rather poor plan. So poor, the idea of a bomb may be nothing more than a smoke screen. How do they plan on using a bomb?

Is science going to develop a bomb or missile that can travel hundreds or thousands of miles and somehow distribute a deadly virus? How is the bomb going to accomplish that? Will it spray out virus cells at a high altitude, or low altitude? How would the military guarantee the spread of the virus with wind and weather conditions? A computer system could be developed using wind speeds and other conditions to calculate the release for maximum effect. I doubt if there is a plan of launching a missile, sticking it in the ground and have the virus spray out. Which would be more accurate, but would require a focused shot and landing in certain soil conditions where the bomb was not too deep and would not be damaged on impact.

Exploding a bomb overhead is a ridiculous idea. Viruses are living cells. Heat from an explosion would kill the virus cells. When looking at bird flu we know viruses depend on a narrow temperature range to exist. The original bird flu could exist and thrive in birds, but died in humans which have a lower body temperature. We also know sunlight kills covid-19 as well as most other viruses. We also know covid-19 and other flu viruses have short life spans on any given surface. Given those simple facts, we also have to look at the fact, vaccines contain living virus cells and scientists developed concoctions that preserve living virus cells in a solution where they can survive for weeks, months, and maybe years. But what happens when virus cells are released from that controlled atmosphere? That is another subject we do not see discussed on the Internet.

“International laws have limited all known bioweapons production, and developing a weaponized form of a virus would require months of complete secrecy using gene-editing technology. With advanced CRISPR-Cas systems, weapons development could be shortened to weeks, but this is virtually impossible with the current controls in place.”

We know international laws are in place. We also know China has the most advanced laboratories in the world. We also know the latest strain of covid-19 that attacks the nervous system and brain were duplicated in a laboratory in a few short weeks. When we find and read public reports on the development, research, and gain of function experiments over the past year, we know the unimaginable is only a few weeks and a few hundred thousand dollars away. With countries competing to be a step ahead of the rest of the world in bio research, we cannot rule out any possibility. After all, isn’t that the definition of science? Having been in engineering for a number of years I know. An idea is hatched. People say it is impossible. They put their best engineers and scientists on the project and guess what. The impossible becomes a reality.

“Some countries have expressed reservations because the Biological Weapons Convention allows for stockpiling of biological agents and toxins for “prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purposes.” For example, smallpox virus is still stored for these reasons at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, and the Vector Institute in Russia.”

It is rather frightening to think the people responsible for making the rules we live under always seem to come up with exceptions to those rules. Instead of destroying the deadliest viruses in the world, the powers to be decided it was okay for a few choice countries to preserve those viruses just in case. In case of what? If they are ever attacked or threatened, those governments can reproduce those viruses in large quantities and threaten to release them on their enemies. The world of bioweapons plays under the same rules as nuclear weapons. The only way to peace is to guarantee both sides are able to destroy the entire world. After 70 years you would think this world could come up with a better plan. We can only surmise, they were too busy investing new ways to destroy the world to give preserving and protecting the world any thought.

America has always been the country normal thinking individuals want to come to and start a new life with dreams of what that perfect life would be. It doesn’t matter where people came from, what color they are, or what their religious beliefs are. All ideal Americans share the same basic fundamental beliefs. To be free to pursue their dreams. To make a better life for their children. And live in a society where the government stays the hell out of their lives. Why can’t people in power appreciate those dreams and get out of the way so the average person can make them a reality worldwide? Why do they have to concentrate on rules and regulations that really should not exist and have absolutely no bearing on the dreams of every normal thinking person in the world. With that thought in mind, we can see the thought of world domination is a dream shared by a tiny minority of people in this world. Why can’t the vast majority of the world stand up against such a tiny minority?

What causes thoughts of world domination? Or better yet, what causes crime in general? What makes the criminal mind work the way it does? If we invested one tenth of what was spend to destroy this world in preserving this world and solving social issues that plague every corner of this world, maybe we would have seen progress on a similar scale we have seen science move virus development. Imagine if we had scientists and laboratories working on chemical imbalances inside the criminal mind instead of mutating viruses to wipe out human life. Then again, when we rely on the people we see in power today, we know any progress to solve social issues would be quickly channeled in mind control and other inventions that would benefit the people in power and no one else. We obviously have the wrong people in power. That is the first problem we need to solve.

When we dwell on social problems and crime, we look for the causes. Lust and greed are two of the main ingredients. How do we solve those problems? How do we cure lust and vanquish greed? Lust comes in many forms. People lust over power and control. Rapist lust after power and control over their victims. The same power and control world leaders lust over. How do we eliminate lust? So far our only solution has been to pass a never ending list of laws. God seemed to come up with the solution with 10 simple commandments. I am sure other religions have their own list. Then we have what we’ve seen in 2021 which was to eliminate laws and release criminals. We’ve seen how well that worked out.

It is amazing to see politicians work in the opposite direction common sense tells us to go. Basic survival instincts tell us to lock up criminals. But what is being done to rehabilitate criminals? Imagine what could be accomplished if the money and effort invested in virus research was invested in criminal rehabilitation. Have we exhausted every avenue of counseling, job training, and education to name a few? Or are those unexplored regions of science? Of course something is being done on levels we never hear about. One more example of censorship and the course politicians have chosen to take. Plans to help criminals in productive manner do no align with plans radical politician have put into full swing since the 2020 election. We heard news about job creation, early prison release programs, and other social programs in progress before the election. Those stories were few and far between but they did exist. Since the election in 2020 those stories disappeared. Yes, covid-19 is being used as a bioweapon at this moment. One effective use is a smoke screen to censor and cover up stories that could benefit society as a whole.


Next Generation Bioweapons:

Genetic Engineering and BW

Today, we face not only natural diseases (including emerging infectious diseases), but also threats of BW or BT, possibly with genetically engineered agents, that may resist known therapies. In simple terms, genetic engineering is the process of human intervention to transfer functional genes (DNA) between two biological organisms. In the BW/BT context, it is the manipulation of genes to create new pathogenic characteristics (increased survivability, infectivity, virulence, drug resistance, etc). Organisms with altered characteristics are the ―next generation‖ biological weapons.

The Office of the Secretary of Defense has identified countries that maintain various levels of offensive biological warfare capabilities or research facilities. This list includes Russia, China, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Libya, India, and Pakistan. The Henry L. Stimson Center also lists Egypt, Israel, and Taiwan as countries of ―proliferation concern.

Also, the Al Qaeda network reportedly sought to buy biological agents.

This article in the form of a PDF file is one of the most informative papers I have seen on the Internet. Which brings up the point, why isn’t the administration and news agencies doing their job and reviewing all the information available? Both the government and news agencies employ hundreds of people, paying them hundreds of thousands of dollar to conduct research and not one of them can supply the general public with any useful information. Everything spread by the administration and media falls far short of what this single research paper offers.

When we see organizations like Al Qaeda trying to purchase bioweapons and a US president funding those organizations, we have more than enough reasons to ask questions, and take to the streets to demand answers.

It is rare to find a comprehensive history on bioweapons including research and evidence of goals, ambitions, strides, and mistakes in countries including the US, China, and Russia.

The list of viruses that have been released by laboratories around the world is shocking to say the least. Of course it seems the media missed the majority of those stories. Was that censorship or did an editor make a decision not to release those stories. In either case, it is a form of censorship that is dangerous. What price is paid when scientists and governments can make fatal mistakes and simply say, “no one will ever hear about it.” It goes without saying, when editors make poor decisions, we all suffer.

To think we live in a world where scientists risk their lives to escape from communist countries to come to what they imagine is a democratic and free country only to find out, the information they escaped with to share with the world is either censored by the government, or if they are allowed to share their stories, editors decide the story will not generate as much revenue as the story about some movie star sticking their foot in their mouth, or some crazy member of congress making some ridiculous statement. So stories the general pubic could use to save their lives are scraped in favor of the day’s soap opera attraction.

Censorship is a weapon all its own. As deadly as any virus. Censorship and editing are all around us and sad to say, have a much longer life span than any flu virus. While researching Pol Pot I ran into an interesting article I decided not to share. I’ve written previous articles on Pol Pot, other communist leaders, and genocide. So naturally I returned to a source I previously used and considered reliable. But as I read through that article it became evident the information on Pol Pot had been recently edited. A few years ago the article told how Pol Pot was responsible for one of the most sever cases of genocide the world has ever seen. In 2022 that article was edited to make Pol Pot appear as the savior and liberator of his people. Suddenly Pol Pot is made to look the part of a hero. When we see editing like that it is time to worry.

There is nothing wrong with someone publishing a story to make Pol Pot look like a hero. When we believe in freedom of speech we have to learn to live with both edges that sword presents. But it is wrong when companies and administrations censor stories that do not agree with their political agenda. You want to talk about bioweapons, consider how much covid-19 has been censored and edited. How much information has been withheld and edited. Consider what governments have done to control stories as well as the masses. When we look at covid-19, we can be assured our immune system can handle every variation. But lets take a look at a twist on some of the popular claims springing up around covid-19. People claim they are not safe unless you are vaccinated. Lets take a realistic view of that fact. You are not safe as long as they allow censorship, support censorship, and refuse to do their own research.

“Soviet scientists had solved the problems of fragile microbe survival in major atmospheric pressure changes and temperature extremes during missile flight by fitting BW rockets with astronaut cabin-like protective systems. They solved the ―destruction on explosion‖ problem by selecting the hardiest strains and calculating the required redundant quantity needed based on explosive testing done in Biopreparat and other BW research labs.”

When we do our research, we never know what we will uncover. The question of how to deliver viruses in missiles has been on the minds of governments for a long time and papers show, they have solved a number of the problems. Now that the technology has been developed, what do we do? We have agreements countries have signed not to conduct such research. But those agreements are filled with a number of exceptions that can be interpreted a hundred different ways. We also have to consider the fact, we most likely hear less than 1% of what is discussed behind closed doors.

“Because the FSU classified its offensive BW program as ―Special Importance‖ (higher than Top Secret), it is clear that they considered BW missiles to be as valuable as their nuclear missiles.39 Because of the protective military secrecy, it is plausible that even many top ranking Soviet/Russian officials did not know the full extent and details of the offensive program nor have control over it.”

When we consider countries like Russia and China, we know we will never hear about their advancements and plans with bioweapons. Most of us want to stop at knowing the fact, they do exist. We already know bioweapons exist in Russia and China, the US and half the other democratic countries have them. What about terrorist countries? When we look at the speed and ease viruses have been developed in laboratories, we know it is only a matter of time before third world countries develop a stockpile of bioweapons. Then what happens? Do they hold the world hostage? Do they demand payments? Based on some of the stranger events in the world over the past year, it may be possible payments have already been made to terrorist nations that have not been disclosed. That may explain why a handful of terrorist nations have been removed from the terrorist watch list, immigrants from those countries countries have poured into the US and other countries, and unexplained payments have been made. Chances are, we are looking in the wrong direction. And if we are, God help us.

“The rise of biotechnology knowledge presently parallels an increase in the willingness of terrorists to inflict mass casualties and increased devastation. Following the historical pattern of interaction between warfare and disease, these two relatively new phenomena of unprecedented biotechnology and terrorists willing to inflict mass casualties will very likely intersect in history. The anthrax attacks in the United States following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the twin towers of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon likely are previews of coming events.”

When we consider the possibility of terrorist threats using viruses and other agents, we know governments all over the world have been reviewing those threats. We have a number of agencies preparing for such threats and initiating every conceivable safety measure. When we see something like covid-19 happen, it is only natural to question how human entities were involved and expect to hear logical answers. Good leaders know how to calm the people they lead because of a moral bond and connection. But when that bond does not exist, what kind of answers would you expect? People are not stupid. They can tell when they are being lied to and when facts are being hidden. I think God intentionally deletes common sense from the criminal mind making it easy for normal people to see when a threat exists. When we see certain reactions exhibited, trust flies out the window and a defensive mechanism kicks in. That is only natural and most people share the same natural reaction. Which makes 2021 and 2022 so confusing. Especially when we just moved from an open and honest President not afraid to admit a mistake, and often said, “more information has to be gathered,” to a president who turns his back on questions and has established a track record of casting blame and denying mistakes. It is as if God placed Trump in the unique position to educate the American public and the world for what we were about to experience in 2021 and the future. And that is the confusing part. The most vociferous people seem to have missed that lesson. Even tough they are a small minority, they have mastered the ability of being a thorn in the side of society. Which I guess is their ultimate goal.

“Yet, curiously, when biological weapons have been employed in battle, they have proven relatively ineffectual. They have been undependable and uncontrollable. Because they have been difficult to deploy reliably, their military value has been marginal. Stabilizing biological agents and deploying them, either overtly with sophisticated weaponry or covertly without endangering the perpetrator or friendly forces, requires expertise not widely held. Possibly, with the capabilities of biological engineering and a new generation of weapons, this may change.”

This article written in April of 2019 contradicts the previous article written in August of 2021 that attempted to debunk the theory that covid-19 escaped from a lab. Comments were made by the author in 2021 making it sound like China would have used a missile to release the virus if that was their intent. Although the author in 2019 submitted two sides of the story, one where Russia solved major problems with using missiles to deliver a virus, he later lists major issues involved with delivering viruses via missiles.

When we consider real life facts, especially facts we have experienced, viruses can be quickly spread from human to human. As soon as information about covid-19 was released in early 2020, masks were seen everywhere. Masks were in short supply and sales shot through the roof. Hospitals ran out of masks and other essential equipment. Needless to say, we all saw how quickly a virus can spread from person to person. Why would a government waste time and money on an obviously less reliable means of deployment and delivery? Name one government who is really concerned with casualties on their side. Government leaders are the first to tells us, our sacrifice is a small and noble thing. Human life will always be a lot less expensive than any missile. If a missile was used to deploy covid-19, the source would have been identified before the missile touched down. But if people were used to spread the virus, it would prove almost impossible to trace the source down to the first person or group of people. Then throw in some unknown animal link and you have people running around an endless series of rabbit holes.

There are a million ways a government or any militant faction can quickly spread a virus using a handful of human beings. We’ve seen how governments have been researching a number of details and scenarios surrounding covid and other viruses. You can’t tell me they haven’t been gathering data and running mathematical models looking at every possibility that pops into their mind. Not when we are dealing with viruses that sprang out of the imagination of a handful of people who are paid for coming up with concepts and filing reports.

Which brings up another detail missing from the news and in reports from the administration. What do we do in the event of a bioweapon attack? Imagine for a moment living in a world with an honest media and administration. Your favorite TV program is interrupted. Your phone tells you a text message was just delivered. You find out we are under attack. A killer virus has been released. What do you do? Do we drive down to some destination to pick up a free gas mask and bio suit? Or do we turn on the news the next day to see the speaker of the house call everyone back from vacation so they can vote on another multi-trillion dollar spending bill? Do we go in for another shot? How do we eat, what is safe to drink? We know the masks we bought for covid don’t work. What are the plans? The threat is real. Or maybe, we don’t fit into their future plans.

If a bio-attack uses a virus resembling the flu, it could take days before the government figures out it is an attack. The scenario on the paper under review described covid-19 to the letter. The virus spread quickly. It was first unknown what the effects would be, then suddenly turned far more serious than the common flu. Hospitals were unprepared and ill-equiped to handle specific symptoms. News and reports traveled fast, but not as fast as the virus. Based on this report from the US Air Force, covid-19 had all the markings of a bio-attack.

“As a biological weapon, a stealth virus could clandestinely infect the genome of a population. Later, the virus could be activated in the targeted population, or a threat of activation could be used as blackmail. Oncogenes are segments of DNA that, when switched on, can initiate wild cellular growth and misbehavior—the hallmarks of cancer. Some viruses have segments of DNA that can mimic oncogenes and directly, or perhaps through bioregulators or host genes, cause cancer. These changes may take years for clinical effect, but the concept may still be considered by bioterrorists.”

Imagine a virus introduced and activated at a later date. Who thinks up these things? This fits the conspiracy theory surrounding 5G communication upgrades recently introduced. We have to admit, the timing is suspect. Since those triggered viruses were researched and developed before 2019, the possibility of a virus triggered by a message delivered via 5G is a threat to consider. When we look at all of the threats that exist today, we can’t help but get feelings of hopelessness. But the human spirit will always fight to survive. Questioning events is a natural survival instinct. Nothing more and nothing less and must be respected. Which is what protests around the world are demanding, the right to question, demand answers, and make our own decisions. Based on the track record of most governments during the covid-19 pandemic, confidence is low to say the least. Very little is being done to enhance confidence, which is more than a red flag. When the majority of world leaders cannot understand the decline in confidence, we know something is up. And we know we are not going to see answers until it is too late.

“When this happens naturally, the process results in an emerging disease. If it were to be induced by man, it would be bioterrorism. In the laboratory of inspired, determined and well-funded bioterrorists, an animal virus may be genetically modified and developed specifically to infect human populations. Emerging diseases could have serious implications for biological warfare or terrorism applications.”

When the Air Force calls man made viruses an act of terrorism, we have to pay attention. How that relates to covid-19 is anyone’s guess. Since this article was written before covid-19 entered the world stage, we have to admit, comments made were based on possible scenarios. Since the release of covid-19, we have to admit, if one organization shared the idea of releasing a super virus, that was no longer an original idea. Bio-warfare has been around for a long time. Governments were more than eager to test nuclear weapons. We can only imagine how they couldn’t wait to take out a new toy to play with. But this is far from a game.

“Designer diseases may work by turning off the immune system, by inducing specific cells to multiply and divide rapidly (like cancer), or possibly by causing the opposite effect, such as initiating programmed cell death (apotosis). This futuristic biotechnology would clearly indicate an order-of-magnitude advancement in offensive biological warfare or terrorism capability.”

As we can see, they are not missing a single detail in the art of killing. Virus attacks are a different beast. Who do you think came up with the idea of developing a virus designed to attack the immune system? If we looked at this from a religious perspective, attacking the immune system could be considered a direct attack on God. When we look at the description of the locusts coming out of the bottomless pit, we have to go back and take another look at that description John recorded. In our day and age it is not out of the question to think John was describing a virus in terms he could understand. Although that interpretation would be rejected by theologians who have been preaching their private interpretation their entire carrier, it doesn’t hurt to take a fresh look at what could be a warning about bio-warfare.

When we consider papers were written about a virus that attacks the immune system years before covid-19, we have to go back and review what we’ve been told, and what we haven’t been told. For over a year we been told to get the vaccine. We’ve been threatened, bribed, and the administration and media have went out of their way to use the vaccine to divide people. We’ve heard every angle except for the one that has effectively worked against every virus nature could imagine and throw at mankind, our natural immune system. On the religious end, the immune system is a testimony to God and proves His existence. One of the most important tools Jesus used was the power of healing. At creation God installed the immune system. God saw all of this coming and prepared for it. God knew about all those super viruses long before the devil whispered ideas in their ears. Long before Satan promised them fame and fortune to develop new ways to kill people.

In just a few articles we’ve uncovered more than we could imagine. We knew bioweapons existed, but not to the extent we learned about. We know, viruses are being developed to attack us in ways we never imagined. Based on the latest strain of covid-19, we know a strain mutated to attack the nervous system and brain. We know our immune system has been able to fight off every covid-19 variant up to this point. The news tells us, people who have been fighting cancer and took the vaccine developed new complications. We also know covid-19 is no seasonal flu. Covid-19 lingers on in 2022 and at this point, no end is in sight.

We heard Dr Fauci claim he has no interest in gain of function experiments. Even though he filed grant requests for gain of function experiments as far back as 2013 and has overseen grants for gain of function experiments over the years. Requests for grants are public record and until someone removes them, are evidence showing how viruses have been mutated in laboratories for years.

When we look into bioweapons, we see how viruses have been taken to new levels. On their own viruses normally thrive in specific hosts and have a short lifespan outside of that host. If left to their own, viruses rarely jump from species to species. Those attributes were viewed as obstacles by a few in the scientific community. One by one those hurdles were cleared as new, more deadly viruses were created in laboratories all over the world. After the basic hurdles were cleared, some of the greatest minds in the world turned to new ways to attack and disable the human body.

We know experiments cleared other obstacles, like the ability for viruses to live outside of hosts for extended periods of time. Viruses were created to withstand the forces of a missile launch and explosion required to deploy viruses as a bioweapon.

We know we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg. The military doesn’t care if the world knows the infantry uses 5.56 MM AR-15’s rifles or the newer 6.5 MM rifles with computerized scopes. That is basic information. What we read, what has been made public, does not begin to describe what is in their bioweapon arsenal. In short, we have no way of knowing how many ways the military is able to destroy life on earth, and how many times they can destroy every human being on earth. We do know that power lies in the hands of a few choice people. And all we can do is pray.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!