Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Fauci Funded then Covered Up H7N9 Fabricated Virus in 2013

When we look at the sequence of events followed By Fauci the follow me I am science man, we see a distinct timeline between experiments designed to produce super viruses first spreading from birds to humans, then easily spread from human to human. We also see experiments designed to immunize hosts, masking symptoms in vaccinated people who are used as living incubation chambers for viruses to mutate and infect unvaccinated people with a more severe virus strain with higher fatality rates. Studies in 2013 through 2017 show a direct parallel with results we have seen in real life in 2021 heading into 2022.


2011 Oct

Ocular Tropism of Influenza A Viruses: Identification of H7 Subtype-Specific Host Responses in Human Respiratory and Ocular Cells

To study virus-host interactions in ocular tissue, we infected primary human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells with H7, H5, and H1 subtype viruses. We found that numerous virus subtypes were capable of infecting and replicating in multiple human ocular cell types, with the highest titers observed with highly pathogenic H7N7 and H5N1 viruses.

As we can see, as far back as 2011 scientists have been experimenting with super spreader viruses by mixing a series of viruses until they developed a man made concoction of bird flu viruses and mammal, or human viruses. The studies at first appeared to be designed to gather data. Scientists stretched the boundaries of imagination in an attempt to first imagine, then create the worst case virus scenario able to spread from species to species, host to host, overcome vaccines, and spread through vaccination attempts. Is it by chance Fauci has been able to predict courses covid-19 has taken, or is Dr Fauci revealing bits and pieces of what scientists have learned from the creation and release of those super viruses in the name of science and research.


December 30, 2011

By Anthony S. Fauci

A deadly influenza virus has circulated widely in birds in recent years, decimating flocks but rarely spreading to humans. Nonetheless, because of its persistence in bird flocks, this highly pathogenic avian influenza virus has loomed as a major public health threat. Seasonal influenza kills less than 1 percent of the people it infects. In contrast, human infections with H5N1, though exceedingly rare, are fatal in more than half of cases. Should this virus mutate in a way that allows it to be transmitted as efficiently among people as seasonal influenza viruses are, it could take an unprecedented toll on human life.

A number of important scientific and public health questions regarding this virus remain unanswered, including the likelihood of such mutations arising and the mechanisms by which they may occur. Two recent studies co-funded by the National Institutes of Health have shed light on how this potentially grave human health threat could become a reality. Working carefully with influenza viruses they have engineered in isolated biocontainment laboratories, scientists in Europe and the United States have identified several mechanisms by which the virus might evolve to transmit efficiently in the ferret, the best animal model for human influenza infection.

Given these uncertainties, important information and insights can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory.

The question is whether benefits of such research outweigh risks. The answer is not simple. A highly pathogenic bird flu virus transmissible in humans could arise in ways not predicted by laboratory studies. And it is not clear whether this laboratory virus would behave in humans as it does in ferrets. Nonetheless, new data provide valuable insights that can inform influenza preparedness and help delineate the principles of virus transmission between species.

In a letter designed to gain funding for his experiments, Dr Fauci shares insight to the goals of those experiments. Since it was nearly impossible for bird flu to transmit to humans and survive in humans, Dr Fauci developed a set of experiments to first develop a new super virus capable of creating a bridge between bird and humans. Then a series of experiments to study how quickly and in how many different ways that new man made virus would be capable of spreading from human to human, country to country, then how a new super virus could overcome vaccinations, mutate, and spread. To say the least, the release of Dr Fauci’s new super virus was a super form of job security with nearly unlimited funding.


Sunday, 28 April 2013 07:38 PM

Anthony Fauci: New Bird Flu Virus Could Spread Among Humans

There is no evidence that the deadly H7N9 bird flu has yet spread between humans in China but health authorities must be ready for the virus to mutate at any time, a top US virologist has warned.

Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said officials in China had studied more than 1,000 close contacts of confirmed cases and not found any evidence of human-to-human transmission.

“That is powerful evidence because if you had a thousand contacts with someone with the flu you would be pretty sure some of them would have been infected,” Fauci said in an interview with AFP.

In April of 2013 we see the first suspected public release of Fauci’s super virus. The virus was able to infect 1000 people in China, but Fauci voiced concern when the results showed the virus was unable to spread from human to human.


May 8, 2013 2:49 AM ET

Officials Prepare For Another Flu Pandemic — Just In Case

There’s been a buzz of activity at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta since scientists got their first samples of a new bird flu virus from China four weeks ago.

Already they’ve prepared “seed strains” of the virus, called H7N9, and distributed them to vaccine manufacturers so the companies can grow them up and make them into experimental flu vaccine.

They’ve also come up with a new diagnostic test for H7N9 that the Food and Drug Administration has approved on an emergency basis.

Meanwhile, CDC researchers have almost concluded experiments that involve infecting ferrets with H7N9 — in particular, a virus derived from a 35-year-old Chinese housewife who died last Monday from the flu.

Because ferrets’ respiratory tracts are similar to those in humans, researchers want to see if the animals can infect each other through droplets in their exhalations, a possible clue to the all-important issue of whether this virus has the potential to spread readily among humans.

Dr. Daniel Jernigan, deputy director of CDC’s influenza division, says there are two main reasons why H7N9 is getting so much attention.

First, people who get it usually get very sick, and so far nearly a quarter of the 130 human cases have resulted in death.

Second, the genetic makeup of this new virus is disturbingly different from an older bird flu virus that has sickened more than 600 people over the past 10 years and killed more than half of them. That virus is an H5 type.

“The thing that’s different between them is the H5 virus still maintains a lot of the avian or bird flu characteristics,” Jernigan tells Shots, “whereas this H7N9 shows some adaptation to mammals. And that’s what makes it different and concerning for us.”

For instance, the newer bird flu has adapted to thrive at human body temperature, which is much lower than the body temperature of birds. It’s a necessary step toward becoming a flu that could spread easily from human to human — but it’s not sufficient.

One month after reviewing results from the first public information on the new super virus detected in China in April 2013, laboratories experimented with a new strain in ferrets that showed promises of spreading from ferret to ferret.


2013 Jul-Aug

H7N9 Avian Influenza A Virus and the Perpetual Challenge of Potential Human Pandemicity

The ongoing H7N9 influenza epizootic in China once again presents us questions about the origin of pandemics and how to recognize them in early stages of development. Over the past ~135 years, H7 influenza viruses have neither caused pandemics nor been recognized as having undergone human adaptation. Yet several unusual properties of these viruses, including their poultry epizootic potential, mammalian adaptation, and atypical clinical syndromes in rarely infected humans, suggest that they may be different from other avian influenza viruses, thus questioning any assurance that the likelihood of human adaptation is low.

Science was unable to study bird flu in humans because cases were so rare for 135 years. Developing a new man made strain of bird flu in the laboratory was the only solution.


07 August 2013

Gain-of-function experiments on H7N9

To better assess the pandemic threat posed by A(H7N9) viruses, investigators from the NIAID Centers of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance and other expert laboratories in China and elsewhere have characterized the wild-type avian A(H7N9) viruses in terms of host range, virulence and transmission, and are evaluating the effectiveness of antiviral drugs and vaccine candidates. However, to fully assess the potential risk associated with these novel viruses, there is a need for further research, including experiments that may be classified as ‘gain of function’ (GOF).

Normally, epidemiological studies and characterization of viruses from field isolates are used to inform policy decisions regarding public-health responses to a potential pandemic. However, classical epidemiological tracking does not give public-health authorities the time they need to mount an effective response to mitigate the effects of a pandemic virus. To provide information that can assist surveillance activities — thus enabling appropriate public-health preparations to be initiated before a pandemic — experiments that may result in GOF are critical.

Therefore, after review and approval, we propose to perform experiments that may result in GOF (see ‘Proposed gain-of-function experiments’).

Fauci sought funding for Gain of Function experiments which simply developed new strains of viruses for experiment purposes. The threat of a worldwide pandemic with loss of human life was a small price to pay for the information scientists hoped to gather. When we put timelines together we see how developments in laboratories are generally followed by limited outbreaks of the virus in small urban populations in China. Not once, but a series of outbreaks within months of every major break through in laboratories.


Aug 8, 2013,08:43am EDT

In an outrageous display of chutzpah, a group of flu researchers led by Ron Fouchier of Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands announced today, in a letter to the journal Nature, that they were planning to engineer the new H7N9 avian flu strain to give it new, possibly much more deadly capabilities. Fouchier is the same scientist who, two years ago, adapted the highly pathogenic H5N1 flu strain so that it could be passed from human to human, which it cannot do in its natural form. The resulting outcry delayed publication of his paper, but it eventually did appear.

Although Fouchier is in Rotterdam, the NIH funds part of his work through the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of NIAID, offered the reassurance that a special panel will review this H7N9 project, and

“If the risk is felt to be too high by this outside review, they will recommend it won’t be done and we won’t fund it.”

Some scientists shared their thoughts and plans. If we had paid better attention to the warning signs in 2013, everything we’ve seen in 2020 and 2021 could have been avoided. When research was made public, Dr Fauci simply assured the public, funding would be cut if experiments got out of hand. So far all we’ve seen is viruses spreading faster, more serious symptoms, and Fauci receiving unlimited funding.


2014 Sep 25

Pandemic potential of H7N9 influenza viruses

Avian influenza viruses rarely infect humans, but the recently emerged avian H7N9 influenza viruses have caused sporadic infections in humans in China, resulting in 440 confirmed cases with 122 fatalities as of May 16, 2014. In addition, epidemiologic surveys suggest that there have been asymptomatic or mild human infections with H7N9 viruses. These viruses replicate efficiently in mammals, show limited transmissibility in ferrets and guinea pigs, and possess mammalian-adapting amino acid changes that likely contribute to their ability to infect mammals. Here, we summarize the characteristic features of the novel H7N9 viruses and assess their pandemic potential.

Despite the wide host range of influenza A viruses, their transmission from avian to mammalian species or vice versa is rare due to host range restrictions. Influenza A viruses circulating in avian species (so-called ‘avian influenza viruses’) rarely infects humans, and influenza A viruses circulating in humans (‘human influenza viruses’) rarely infect avian species 4–7. Recently, however, avian influenza A viruses of the H5N1 and H7N9 subtypes have caused hundreds of cases of human infections. So far, sustained human-to-human transmission of these viruses has not been reported. Nonetheless, additional adaptive mutations and/or reassortment with circulating human viruses may enable H5N1 or H7N9 viruses to efficiently infect humans and transmit among them. Because humans lack protective antibodies against these viruses, human-transmitting H5N1 or H7N9 viruses could spread worldwide, resulting in an influenza pandemic.

Human infections with avian H7N9 influenza viruses in China in 2013–2014

To date, two sizable waves of human infection with H7N9 viruses have been documented (Figure 2A). The first wave started with a human case of H7N9 influenza virus infection in Shanghai on February 19, 2013 (this case was officially reported on March 31, 2013) 8. In April 2013, the number of human cases of H7N9 virus infections increased significantly, reaching 125 confirmed cases in China by the end of April.

Epidemiological studies have shown that H7N9 virus infections have affected mainly middle-aged or older individuals (Figure 2C; i.e., the median age at infection is 63 years) 19–29. Interestingly, two-thirds of the infected individuals have been male 19, 20, 22–24, 27–29 (Figure 2C). The high number of cases among elderly men may reflect socio-economical differences among age groups and genders since elderly men may have frequent work-related or non-job-related contact with poultry. Most H7N9 influenza patients exhibit general influenza-like symptoms, including fever and cough, and more than half of the infections typically progress to severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and multi-organ failure 8, 11, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 30–38. Most H7N9 virus-infected patients possessed at least one underlying medical condition, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and/or chronic lung and heart disease 19, 21–23, 25, 26, 28, 31, 39, 40, suggesting that these comorbidities may increase the risk of severe H7N9 virus infection.

In 2014 bird flu rarely infected humans and it was impossible for the virus to spread from human to human. Scientists were convinced there was a possibility of the virus eventually spreading from human to human and feared the results. Keep in mind, the H7N9 viruses are man made, and would have never posed a treat if they weren’t somehow released to the public in China. Scientists continued studies to develop a strain that could transmit from human to human.


2014 Dec 8

Gain-of-function experiments: time for a real debate

According to the WHO, dual use research of concern (DURC) is “life sciences research that is intended for benefit, but which might easily be misapplied to do harm”. Recent studies, particularly those on influenza viruses, have led to renewed attention on DURC, as there is an ongoing debate over whether the benefits of gain-of-function (GOF) experiments that result in an increase in the transmission and/or pathogenicity of potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs) are outweighed by concerns over biosecurity and biosafety. In this Viewpoint article, proponents and opponents of GOF experiments discuss the benefits and risks associated with these studies, as well as the implications of the current debate for the scientific community and the general public, and suggest how the current discussion should move forward.

Studies and debates continued through the end of 2014 justifying the development of a bird flu transmitted to humans then easily transmitted from human to human. All in the name of science.


2015 Jul; 13

Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens

Could some vaccines drive the evolution of more virulent pathogens? Conventional wisdom is that natural selection will remove highly lethal pathogens if host death greatly reduces transmission. Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population. Here we show experimentally that immunization of chickens against Marek’s disease virus enhances the fitness of more virulent strains, making it possible for hyperpathogenic strains to transmit. Immunity elicited by direct vaccination or by maternal vaccination prolongs host survival but does not prevent infection, viral replication or transmission, thus extending the infectious periods of strains otherwise too lethal to persist. Our data show that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts.

Infectious agents can rapidly evolve in response to health interventions [1]. Here, we ask whether pathogen adaptation to vaccinated hosts can result in the evolution of more virulent pathogens (defined here to mean those that cause more or faster mortality in unvaccinated hosts).

Continued studies revealed, the use of a faulty vaccine was the key to spreading the man made H7N9 virus from human to human. These studied also showed, vaccinated individuals were able to spread that man made virus to unvaccinated individuals. A goal Dr Fauci wrote about in 2011 and 2013.


2016 Aug 8

Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis

Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens. Such research, when conducted by responsible scientists, usually aims to improve understanding of disease causing agents, their interaction with human hosts, and/or their potential to cause pandemics. The ultimate objective of such research is to better inform public health and preparedness efforts and/or development of medical countermeasures. Despite these important potential benefits, GOF research (GOFR) can pose risks regarding biosecurity and biosafety. GOFR is a subset of “dual-use research”—i.e., research that can be used for both beneficial and malevolent purposes. Whereas the dual-use life science research debate has largely focused on biosecurity dangers associated with potential malevolent use of research, the GOFR debate has more explicitly focused on risks involving both biosecurity and biosafety—the point being that creation of especially dangerous pathogens might pose highly significant biosafety risks that are independent of, and perhaps more feasible to measure/assess than, risks associated with malevolent use.

As the debate raged, scientists who knew a super virus was released to the public argued for additional funds to study the mutation within humans, the spread, and role vaccines would play in the spread of a new super virus. All of this man made. Funding was needed, the gloves were off, and scientists knew the plague was out of the box.


2017 Dec 1

Genesis and Spread of Newly Emerged Highly Pathogenic H7N9 Avian Viruses in Mainland China

The novel low-pathogenic avian influenza A H7N9 viruses (LPAI H7N9 viruses) have been a threat to public health since their emergence in 2013 because of the high rates of mortality and morbidity that they cause. Recently, highly pathogenic variants of these avian influenza A H7N9 viruses (HPAI H7N9 viruses) have emerged and caused human infections and outbreaks among poultry in mainland China.

IMPORTANCE The LPAI H7N9 virus has caused five outbreak waves in humans and was recently reported to have mutated into highly pathogenic variants. It is unknown how the HPAI H7N9 virus originated, evolved, and disseminated in China.


After five outbreaks in China over a four year period, warnings were finally issued in December 2017. Science was at a loss to combat this new man made super virus. in 2014 it was rare for bird flu to jump to humans, and impossible for the virus to jump from human to human. Laboratory experiments over that four year period developed a strain able to transmit from human to human. Additional experiments showed how a faulty vaccine could help spread the virus while being unsuccessful at controlling the virus. All this information was known in 2017. Two years later we saw the release of this super virus known as covid-19. 2020 and 2021 have shown the results of those experiments. The deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, a continued mutation of the virus, and a virus designed to work with vaccines to increase the spread of the virus. Since 2011 Dr Fauci has been securing funds for experiments directly related to the refinement and spread of the worst feared virus. Today we are not only seeing the effects of those experiments, we have become the unwilling and misinformed subjects of those experiments.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

We Are Seeing Genesis Unfold Today

People tend to skip over Genesis, missing the details that explain what we see happening today. The Bible has a tendency of revealing details we went over a hundred times. Then one day we read those same stories and the details jump off the page explaining everything we happen to be going through at the time. Taking a look at a few stories in Genesis, we not only see how God saw all of this coming, He wrote about it in details we often take for granted. The first five lines in Genesis is a basic summary of the world today.

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was formless and empty, and darkness covered the deep waters. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters. Then God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. And God saw that the light was good. Then he separated the light from the darkness. God called the light “day” and the darkness “night.” And evening passed and morning came, marking the first day. (Gen 1:1-5 NLTse).

We can look at a number of commentaries on the first five lines of Genesis that explain the spiritual concept of light and darkness, day and night. As we progress through the Bible we encounter a number of stories using the comparison between light and darkness to emphasize the difference between good and evil. The problem with commentaries is, they seldom provide concrete answers nor do they look into specific instances in history when they point out spiritual interpretations. Commentaries are more or less a blanket comment. Specific details were always given to God’s prophets. Daniel, Isiah, and others provided specific details on a number of historical events throughout history. That light mentioned in Genesis 1:3 has a physical and spiritual significance. Light covered the earth, displacing darkness. Exactly what is happening in the last days. If you don’t realize God’s angels are working 24/7 around the world to reach people today, you really haven’t read the Bible. There are a few stories covering prophets in the last days.

“Look, I am sending you the prophet Elijah before the great and dreadful day of the LORD arrives. His preaching will turn the hearts of fathers to their children, and the hearts of children to their fathers. Otherwise I will come and strike the land with a curse.” (Mal 4:5-6 NLTse).

Although there are dozens of interpretations to the power of Elijah in the last days, most people agree that power is not given to a single person but distributed among God’s people. Joel and Luke summed the event in a different way.

Once again you will have all the food you want, and you will praise the LORD your God, who does these miracles for you. Never again will my people be disgraced. Then you will know that I am among my people Israel, that I am the LORD your God, and there is no other. Never again will my people be disgraced. “Then, after doing all those things, I will pour out my Spirit upon all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy. Your old men will dream dreams, and your young men will see visions. In those days I will pour out my Spirit even on servants–men and women alike. And I will cause wonders in the heavens and on the earth– blood and fire and columns of smoke. The sun will become dark, and the moon will turn blood red before that great and terrible day of the LORD arrives. But everyone who calls on the name of the LORD will be saved, for some on Mount Zion in Jerusalem will escape, just as the LORD has said. These will be among the survivors whom the LORD has called. (Joe 2:26-32 NLTse).

These people are not drunk, as some of you are assuming. Nine o’clock in the morning is much too early for that. No, what you see was predicted long ago by the prophet Joel: ‘In the last days,’ God says, ‘I will pour out my Spirit upon all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy. Your young men will see visions, and your old men will dream dreams. In those days I will pour out my Spirit even on my servants–men and women alike– and they will prophesy. And I will cause wonders in the heavens above and signs on the earth below– blood and fire and clouds of smoke. The sun will become dark, and the moon will turn blood red before that great and glorious day of the LORD arrives. But everyone who calls on the name of the LORD will be saved.’ (Act 2:15-21 NLTse).

Dozens of stories in the Bible tells us about the power that is going to be distributed among those who believe and listen. Like the prophets in the Old Testament, one is shown one event, another is shown another event. Many of them covering the same time period, but in different kingdoms or cities. When we take time to put it all together, we get a much better look at what was happening in the world at that time, and what God did to deal with it. Of course there are always the two sides of each story. One side deals with the group of people who believe in themselves, or gave themselves over to the devil. The other group was following God, or trying to follow God as best they could. When we read those stories we need to pay attention to both sides of those stories because that is exactly what we are seeing today. One group is trying to follow God and doing their best to follow God. The other group is against God and hates all of God’s followers. Let’s look at the obvious. That group following Satan has no problems listening to the devil and taking orders from the devil. That leaves God’s people at a great disadvantage if they can’t figure out how to take advantage of the light God delivers. As soon as we do, those attacks on God become more than evident. Then of course, the devil has so many attacks, You might see a few, someone else may see others, and other people see other details. That is why we need to come together and share our insights. Why do you think the devil is going full steam ahead on separating people, creating mistrust, adding in lock downs, closing churches, and all the other things we see going on. The devil doesn’t want us to figure out his plans. Hence that is why we see so many attacks on Genesis.

So God created great sea creatures and every living thing that scurries and swarms in the water, and every sort of bird–each producing offspring of the same kind. And God saw that it was good. (Gen 1:21 NLTse).

God made all sorts of wild animals, livestock, and small animals, each able to produce offspring of the same kind. And God saw that it was good. (Gen 1:25 NLTse).

So God created human beings in his own image. In the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. Then God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and multiply. Fill the earth and govern it. Reign over the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, and all the animals that scurry along the ground.” (Gen 1:27-28 NLTse).

God created insects, fish, birds, and animals of all kinds. “Each producing offspring of the same kind.” The same is true with men and women. But today the left loves to create new genders, strange and unusual creations science has created, or people have formulated in their minds. Those are direct attacks on God, Genesis, and creation. How deep does that deception go? Congress has introduced bills, laws, and granted billions of dollars to science to battle against God, Genesis, and creation.

Among other things, S.1975 gives the right for men to have abortions. S.1975 also makes it easy for any member of its protected organizations to sue any medical institution and individual if those services are refused or cannot be provided. S.1975 contains a list of specific groups and makes it easy for members of those protected groups to sue medical institutions.

Any man who belongs to one of those protected groups can walk into any medical institution, demand an abortion, and if the answer is, “it is impossible for a man to be pregnant,” that man can easily sue the institution for astronomical sums of money.

.This is the best Satan can come up with to attack God and place doubts in the heads of millions. Of course there are hundreds of other details that make up the whole story. They begin with sexual obsessions, greed, extreme inferiority complexes, and a number of other assaults Satan uses to gain control. When we cover the basics, we see bits and pieces of Satan’s plans unfolding before our eyes today. Plans that have been repeated throughout history from time to time. But today we see an accumulation of a revolt against God seldom seen in history. Direct attacks against God is one phase of the devil’s plans. As we progress through Genesis we see other details.

This is the account of the creation of the heavens and the earth. When the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, neither wild plants nor grains were growing on the earth. The LORD God had not yet sent rain to water the earth, and there were no people to cultivate the soil. Instead, springs came up from the ground and watered all the land. (Gen 2:4-6 NLTse).

God has always been in control of the weather. Some stories tell how God used weather to defeat kingdoms. Egypt was one example. Today we have factions in government supported by leftest groups demanding huge sums of money in an attempt to control the weather. In essence, this deception is designed to take God’s power away from God and place it upon men and groups who claim they are able to do a better job than God. As pointed out, this is one in a long list of attacks on God. The attacks get deeper and more personal.

Then the LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground. He breathed the breath of life into the man’s nostrils, and the man became a living person. (Gen 2:7 NLTse).

No one has to explain the deep personal relationship between God and mankind creation encompasses on the spiritual level. God bend down and gathered dust from the earth and formed mankind with His own hands. God was not finished until He put His lips on those of Adam and breathed life into that form designed in God’s own image. You could go on for hours contemplating the close personal and spiritual connection conjured by that single sentence. The devil is working overtime to sever that connection, to drive a wedge in that connection, raise doubts in any way possible, and of course offer substitutes.

Before God created mankind, He saw everything Adam and the rest of us would be facing. God saw all the ways the devil would try to destroy His creation. One of those attacks involved viruses and manipulating organisms to attack mankind on an unseen microscopic level. God saw all that coming and when God breathed life into Adam, that included an immune system.

We could go through a hundred pages listing ways science and the government have attacked God by waging war on our bodies in order to offset the balance God placed in our bodies at creation in an attempt to place more reliance on mankind and science. To list just a few, we will look at the immune system, thyroid gland, and methods the powers to be in this world have been working years to interrupt that delicate balance.

The immune system is complex and pervasive. There are numerous cell types that either circulate throughout the body or reside in a particular tissue. Each cell type plays a unique role, with different ways of recognizing problems, communicating with other cells, and performing their functions. By understanding all the details behind this network, researchers may optimize immune responses to confront specific issues, ranging from infections to cancer.

In short, the official government website tells us our immune system is to a large degree, too complicated to fully understand. There are bits and pieces science has been able to unravel. When that knowledge is used for good. many people benefit. When that limited knowledge is used for evil, we see attempts at control through science we have seen unfolding over the past two years heading into 2022. When we see government in bed with science and the media, we are witnesses to an unholy orgy we need to fear. On our own, we don’t stand a chance. Government controls mandates, the release of information they consider inportant while science controls what they want us to know while hiding what they don’t want us to know. The media repeats that information hundreds of times in an attempt to brainwash people. The three work together to divide and conquer setting one class against another in attempts to confuse and camouflage their true intents. The basic immune system is rather easy to understand to a point. The immune system is an extension of our relationship with God. Anyone who has read the Bible knows Elijah healed people, Jesus healed hundreds, and stories are filled with miracles. We may have little understanding exactly how those miracles work. But we do know each of those miracles were formulated to draw us closer to God. Today we see a world where science is attempting to take God’s place.

One story illustrates work done in the background to lay the foundation for science to take God’s place. The thyroid gland is at the center of that story.

A Complex Relationship: The Thyroid and the Immune System

The thyroid is the butterfly-shaped gland in our throat that is an essential regulator in our body. It produces thyroid hormone (TH), which affects virtually every one of our cells and is a contributor to metabolism and keeping us energetic and active. When it is producing TH in appropriate quantities, it holds many organs and systems in equilibrium. We know that there is close communication between the endocrine and immune systems and that alteration in levels of TH can affect the function of the immune system. Thyroid hormones also have a role in inflammation, autoimmunity and clearing pathogens from the body. In what may seem like a strange occurrence, the immune system can also attack the thyroid, however.

Once again we see science has a basic understanding of the thyroid gland and immune system, but their understanding is not at all in the same ballpark as God’s understanding. In other words, science knows just enough to be dangerous. Science knows a few things about the thyroid gland and immune system. Just enough to be destructive.

Iodine is one of the main building blocks of both hormones. Our bodies can’t produce this trace element, so we need to get enough of it in our diet. Iodine is absorbed into our bloodstream from food in our bowel. It is then carried to the thyroid gland, where it is eventually used to make thyroid hormones.

A Rule by the Drug Enforcement Administration on 07/02/2007

This rulemaking changes the regulation of the listed chemical iodine under the chemical regulatory provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) believes that this action is necessary to remove deficiencies in the existing regulatory controls, which have been exploited by drug traffickers who divert iodine (in the form of iodine crystals and iodine tincture) for the illicit production of methamphetamine in clandestine drug laboratories. This rulemaking moves iodine from List II to List I; reduces the iodine threshold from 0.4 kilograms to zero kilograms; adds import and export regulatory controls; and controls.

In 2007 the DEA asked for and received a ban on iodine. Iodine is necessary for the thyroid gland to properly function and regulate a number of body functions including the immune system. Although the law all but cut off iodine supplies in the US, drug manufactures simply switched their supply from US sources to Mexican sources smuggling in everything they need. The question needs to be asked, why the government didn’t put more effort into tracing iodine and other chemicals to illegal drug manufactures and shutting down the illicit businesses.

Iodine not only aides the immune system but is also the key ingredient in combating radiation poisoning caused by the sun. Since banning iodine, skin cancer and other forms of cancer have skyrocketed. Why would the government ban such a vital substance? A quick look at a sequence of events offers an explanation.

Fall 2008: Presidential candidate Barack Obama says, “On health care reform, the American people are too often offered two extremes — government-run health care with higher taxes or letting the insurance companies operate without rules. … I believe both of these extremes are wrong.” Obama wins the presidency a week later.

March 23, 2010: President Obama signs the Affordable Care Act into law. “We did not fear our future, we shaped it,” he says.

It seems rather strange for the government to take full control of a key substance in the development, balance, and control of the human body and set their sights on total control of the national healthcare system. When we look at details like those develop we clearly see how attacks upon God and creation have been in Satan’s sights for years and we are slowly seeing the plan unfold. Of course we have iodized salt. That plays into further plans. Most people know too much salt in a diet causes other complications. It just so happens those are the same complications attributed to the vast majority of covid-19 deaths. Fast food industries thrive on a menu of high concentrations of salt and fats. Exactly what people need to avoid to develop and maintain a healthy immune system. Hundreds of doctors, scientists, and thousands of individuals have questioned why the government has been pushing man made vaccines while ignoring natural remedies centering on diet and life style. Other details related to the push for vaccines shows a long list of actions and answers drawn into question. Covid relief bills funded fast food restaurants specializing in unhealthy diets while research concentrating on healthy diets and life styles have lost funding. We also have changes to school lunch programs and other health related programs that today are luring people into less than healthy choices.

If we decided to study all of the devil’s plans, it wouldn’t take long to identify example after example and see dozens of steps line up an a series of events that clearly explain the actions we see unfolding today. Needles to say, science has less of an understanding of the human body and immune system than what they want us to believe. The obvious example is covid-19. Today science wants to appear to have all the answers. Their answer is of course a one size fits all solution.

When God created mankind, each was in individual. Each person was unique and God knows then all.

But I’ll tell you whom to fear. Fear God, who has the power to kill you and then throw you into hell. Yes, he’s the one to fear. “What is the price of five sparrows–two copper coins? Yet God does not forget a single one of them. And the very hairs on your head are all numbered. So don’t be afraid; you are more valuable to God than a whole flock of sparrows. (Luk 12:5-7 NLTse).

Not only does God know the number of hairs on our heads, He knows our finger prints. Science has long known fingerprints are unique. That tells us how unique our immune system is. Each of us has a unique immune system and the people Jesus healed tell us how God knows how to put that immune system into action. On the other hand, science attempts to approach the immune system as a one size fits all view. Today we see Dr Fauci and president Biden repeating the theory over and over again, science has the answer. A one size fits all vaccine that has failed more than a half dozen times, but this next booster is sure to work. This is nothing short of one battle in the all out attack on God. Of course there are other battles and attacks being waged.

The serpent was the shrewdest of all the wild animals the LORD God had made. One day he asked the woman, “Did God really say you must not eat the fruit from any of the trees in the garden?” “Of course we may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,” the woman replied. “It’s only the fruit from the tree in the middle of the garden that we are not allowed to eat. God said, ‘You must not eat it or even touch it; if you do, you will die.'” “You won’t die!” the serpent replied to the woman. “God knows that your eyes will be opened as soon as you eat it, and you will be like God, knowing both good and evil.” (Gen 3:1-5 NLTse).

Genesis chapter 3 tells us of the first attempt for mankind, in this case Eve, attempting to place destiny on their own hands. We’ve all seen how that turned out. There are a number of spiritual lessons we can cover while reviewing that story, but what happened next is of upmost importance.

Then the LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, you are cursed more than all animals, domestic and wild. You will crawl on your belly, groveling in the dust as long as you live. And I will cause hostility between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring. He will strike your head, and you will strike his heel.” (Gen 3:14-15 NLTse).

Number 1. Battle lines were drawn between the serpent, Satan and mankind. The next verse tells us where Satan will one day focus his attack.

Then he said to the woman, “I will sharpen the pain of your pregnancy, and in pain you will give birth. And you will desire to control your husband, but he will rule over you.” (Gen 3:16 NLTse).

When we put the facts together it is evident why we see Satan and science attacking child birth today. Men giving birth would be viewed as insanity in any generation. But today, we have groups insisting it can be done. And if science can cross that boundary set by God, why can’t science challenge and out do God in other areas such as our immune system and weather control. When we look at the step by step process to date it is not difficult to see where Satan is trying to lead this world. Keep in mind, Satan has many forms of control at his disposal.

And to the man he said, “Since you listened to your wife and ate from the tree whose fruit I commanded you not to eat, the ground is cursed because of you. All your life you will struggle to scratch a living from it. It will grow thorns and thistles for you, though you will eat of its grains. By the sweat of your brow will you have food to eat until you return to the ground from which you were made. For you were made from dust, and to dust you will return.” (Gen 3:17-19 NLTse).

God said, life is not going to be easy. Satan takes that and twists it around to make promises to individuals so they follow him. God told about a rough life. Satan promises an easy life. And people are lining up to take advantage of that promise. And if they refuse that offer, Satan has a solution.

“Why are you so angry?” the LORD asked Cain. “Why do you look so dejected? You will be accepted if you do what is right. But if you refuse to do what is right, then watch out! Sin is crouching at the door, eager to control you. But you must subdue it and be its master.” One day Cain suggested to his brother, “Let’s go out into the fields.” And while they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother, Abel, and killed him. (Gen 4:6-8 NLTse).

Satan offered Cain an easier way. Cain tried it. Of course God didn’t accept it. The solution Satan offered was, your brother Able didn’t agree with you, so kill him. Which has been the satanic oath since that time. Then the deceptions continued to grow.

Then the people began to multiply on the earth, and daughters were born to them. The sons of God saw the beautiful women and took any they wanted as their wives. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit will not put up with humans for such a long time, for they are only mortal flesh. In the future, their normal lifespan will be no more than 120 years.” (Gen 6:1-3 NLTse).

It only took a few generations for Satan to recognize and put a new battle front into action. At first Satan had no way of understanding the relationship between a man and woman. Satan had to way of reproducing, so his understanding was limited. Satan has always relied on compromises which has always been a large part of Satan’s game plan. Then Satan saw a whole new field open up. Satan could use sexual relationships to open new doors to a new set of compromises.

At first there were two groups, those from Cain, and the other from Adam. They were different and distinct. Eventually Satan saw a way of mingling right and wrong, good and evil in attempts to blur light and darkness. Sex became the major factor. Hence we see the most serious and devastating sexual compromises today. Look at the make up of the government today. Biden’s compromises would make those in Sodom proud. We look at the White House today and we get a view of what Lot was up against before God burned Sodom to the ground. People tend to dwell on sexual sins in Sodom, but don’t forget, Lot walked in a rich man. As rich as Abraham. Lot walked out with nothing but the clothes in his back. Which meant, Lot faced people slicker than the scammers we see today. Lot lost his fortune before Sodom was leveled.

Dozens of stories in the Bible tell us how Satan over throws groups by abusing sexual behavior. Satan convinces a few people, it is okay. Then rewards those people in his unique way. The Old Testament is filled with stories tying sex, slavery, and riches together. Forces under Satan march in, rape, pillage, enslave, and carry off all the riches.

Abram recovered all the goods that had been taken, and he brought back his nephew Lot with his possessions and all the women and other captives. (Gen 14:16 NLTse).

Those types of stories began in Genesis and run throughout the Old Testament. Greed is the major factor. A distorted view of relationships has led to slavery and greed of all kinds. More than we could imagine. How much is enough? There never seems to be enough. Kings have gained riches from a number of other cities and countries they conquered. It was never enough. One after one they crossed the line, pushing boundaries until God said that is enough. In our generation we’ve seen those boundaries pushed from millions, to billions, and now trillions of dollars. The groups following Satan are never satisfied. Add to riches, human trafficking and drugs. We see how they are working together. We see all the deceptions and all the sins Satan can imagine coming together, coming out of the woodwork, no longer afraid of operating in the shadows. It seems they rally in showing how they can outdo one another. To show off the so called blessings Satan has poured upon them. Human trafficking is at an all time high. Drug use is at an all time high. Most of which is pouring over the southern border. Like in the days of Cain, killing those who don’t agree is on the menu today. Cities see multiple murders every day and night. Adding a fear factor Satan is expert at using to his advantage.

Covering only the first fourteen chapters of Genesis shows us the majority of Satan’s plans and how he plans on using sex and riches to control people. Who pays the price? Millions of innocent people. Some pay with the loss of possessions, loss of income, and some the loss of their lives. Some are sentenced by Satan to a life of slavery and misery. Compared to the overall population of this world, only a handful of people have totally sided with Satan. This may be a small minority of the world following Satan, but he has all the right people in the right places at the right time. Not only in one country, but the majority of countries throughout the world. Taking a step back we can see how no human could have planned this. No organization could have gotten into so many countries on so many levels. But billions of demons under Satan could have reached enough people willing to compromise in a million different ways.

Today we see a high number of evil factors in action. Government spending trillions of dollars with no accountability. The president’s son involved in questionable actions in Ukraine, Russia, China, and other countries related to money laundering, human trafficking, and everything related to organized crime. We see associations between those in government and their families involved with crime figures in countries all over the world. We see a questionable virus and related reports offering information on limited terms and media working over time to offer less than stellar explanations. We see evidence of fixed elections all over the world. Questionable groups are involved in all those actions all over the world.

The thing those factions fear the most are Christians placing their faith in God who is able to see every action and tell His followers about every plan hatched behind closed doors. They know they can’t hide their plans from God. Satan knows God can warn His people at any moment. Satan has seen how God organized His people. provided key leaders, and put His people into action in the past. That is what Satan fears the most.

Then there is the judgment process where all of this will end. Satan lost the war. The short explanation is, the Universe has to witness how far Satan is willing to go. Today we see the tip of the iceberg. Most of what is happening remains below the surface. But the overall threat is evident. How will this all end? We know in the end Satan gathers his forces.

And I saw three evil spirits that looked like frogs leap from the mouths of the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet. They are demonic spirits who work miracles and go out to all the rulers of the world to gather them for battle against the Lord on that great judgment day of God the Almighty. (Rev 16:13-14 NLTse).

In the last war this world will see, Satan has to gather his armies to battle against someone. Satan will not be gathering his armies to display his armies like a parade in North Korea or China. Satan will be gathering his armies to battle someone. Who is Satan going to war against? Obviously God’s people. Which tells us, God will have His followers, leaders, and nations. We see Satan’s attempts to take over every government in the world. To a degree it appears everything is lost. What are we supposed to do? We have to remember, God makes His biggest and most important impressions when everything seems lost. What exactly God has planned in those days is not evident. Today we see Satan’s plans coming into view. Just like all the stories in the Old Testament, evil is in clear view and it seems impossible for anyone to do anything until God decided to step in. That is when the tide turns and there is no doubt, God has everything under control.

One thing is evident. The judgment process ends in at the end of Revelation chapter 14.

Then I saw a white cloud, and seated on the cloud was someone like the Son of Man. He had a gold crown on his head and a sharp sickle in his hand. Then another angel came from the Temple and shouted to the one sitting on the cloud, “Swing the sickle, for the time of harvest has come; the crop on earth is ripe.” So the one sitting on the cloud swung his sickle over the earth, and the whole earth was harvested. After that, another angel came from the Temple in heaven, and he also had a sharp sickle. Then another angel, who had power to destroy with fire, came from the altar. He shouted to the angel with the sharp sickle, “Swing your sickle now to gather the clusters of grapes from the vines of the earth, for they are ripe for judgment.” So the angel swung his sickle over the earth and loaded the grapes into the great winepress of God’s wrath. (Rev 14:14-19 NLTse).

As soon as the judgment process is complete, every soul who is saved is saved for eternity. Every soul who is lost is lost for eternity. There are no second chances or any way to change the verdicts. Every decision is final. Turn the page and the last seven plagues begin. The first plague is the most important because it tells us, everyone in the world will know the judgment system is complete, and we will all see the difference between the lost and saved.

Then I heard a mighty voice from the Temple say to the seven angels, “Go your ways and pour out on the earth the seven bowls containing God’s wrath.” So the first angel left the Temple and poured out his bowl on the earth, and horrible, malignant sores broke out on everyone who had the mark of the beast and who worshiped his statue. (Rev 16:1-2 NLTse).

Can you imagine what the world will be like when those who are lost, those who have been threatening patriots and conservatives since the election can now see the difference between themselves and those who never gave up on God. We don’t know what that mark or sore actually is, but it places a distinct physical feature on every person who stood before God and was judged by their actions and found guilty. They are lost forever. The world is placed in a situation where the lost have nothing to loose. They are now in the image of their leader, Satan. How are those people going to react the moment they learn they are lost for eternity and there is no turning back. Every follower of Satan will share the lust for revenge Satan has experienced for thousands of years. What will happen when the essence of evil comes to the surface?

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

The Origin of Covid-19

History has proven, an effective vaccine is developed after the origin of the virus is discovered. History has also shown, a virus can never be contained until the origin of that virus has been identified. What is the origin of covid-19? To date, science, the media, and governments all over the world have yet to reveal the origin of covid-19. Is this by accident or design. These questions have been asked by many. The obvious and only answer to that question is unprecedented. Simple questions have been met with accusations of conspiracy theories, revolt, and governments have accused people with simple, logical questions of being members of radical terrorist groups. Why has the media and governments refused to share logical scientific data, but jumped to the conclusion that any logical question is linked to an act of terrorism? This is one of the many questions about covid-19 shared by the majority of people around the world.

There appears to be something sinister about covid-19. Too much is not explained. With the technology today, the origin of a virus can be easily traced, identified, and studies can lead to a safe and effective vaccine. History has shown the origin of vaccines and their safe application. But for some reason legitimate data on covid-19 is either lacking or hidden by the media. Neither the media nor government have taken a single step to identify the origin of covid-19.

One of the biggest problems with covid-19 is the media. Many media outlets have developed a habit of calling legitimate questions, rumors, unfounded lies, and other vicious names. Tactics used by major media sources are more than transparent and if anything else, have lead to more questions. The constant and consistent rhetoric spewed by major medias outlets is transparent to most people. Those media outlets name zero reliable sources while attempting to present themselves as experts in the field of covid-19 and viruses. What is their source? Where did those news anchors derive their education on viruses? When was the last time a news anchor named a legitimate study as their source? They never do. Media only criticizes any and all questions and the presentation of legitimate sources. Major media sources have done nothing in the past year to prove they conducted any research into the stories they present. Instead they stick to criticizing every legitimate claim and question posed by every other source. In short, many major media outlets stick to one concept, making themselves an unquestionable source of information even though they put zero effort into research and refuse to cover any story from the many angles that make up a complex topic.

Governments around the world have taken on the same attitude. It appears most governments around the world use news media outlets as their only source of information, one backing up the other. Media and government have fallen short on reporting major topics with a total lack of facts, sources, and views from different angles that play a key role in the subject at hand. In essence, media and government in 2021 prefer to take on the role of dictator instead of reliable sources of investigative study and unbiased presentation of the facts.

When it comes to an investigation into viruses and covid-19 it has proven difficult to uncover reliable sources. Sources with links to back up their studies. Historical facts and legitimate scientific, unbiased studies are becoming a rare commodity in this information age. Most articles contain a small portion of the information we need to draw a logical conclusion. Most articles contain data with nothing to back it up. The information had to come from somewhere? Why are so many authors hesitant to reveal their sources?

After reviewing a number of articles on covid-19 and other viruses, I did unearth a few articles that met minimum standards. As a matter of fact, a few of these articles exceeded those standards. The following articles contain information the media refuses to share. Why? Reading those articles shows how actual scientific data does not agree with the agenda set by government and the media.

We should avoid making false accusations and establishing conclusions based on our limited medical and scientific knowledge. Many of these articles are beyond our basic understanding and can be easily manipulated to display unfounded conclusions. Great care needs to be exercised in investigations into the scientific and medical back ground on covid and its related viruses. It is best to stick to one fundamental aspect of the subject, and branch out as bits and pieces are understood. This involves researching a number of links to related research and understanding scientific and medical terms the average person is not familiar with.

The following link contains over 200 sources, well documented and linked in a way an average person can follow. This link looks at the origin of viruses, the history of viruses, and to a small degree, research into viruses. Links provided on this site dwell on a number of aspects covered in this article to a far greater depth.

The main question in this article is, what was the origin of covid-19. As we dwell deeper and deeper into a few of those links, studies have shown, the origin of covid-19 is yet unknown. The theory that covid-19 originated in bats has been drawn into question by a number of scientists studying the origin of covid-19. The most revealing fact is the timing. Covid-19 originated in December 2019 at the height of the hibernation season for bats. Another fact brought out by this series of articles is, covid-19 is a combination of a common covid virus and SARS. These articles show information on the make up of and complex formation of covid-19 which is make up of two major sections, the crown, and main body of the virus. The main body consists of a chain of amino acids that resembles other viruses. Similarities range from a 50-90% match. The articles explain why covid-19 lacks a closer match to other covid viruses and present data on its complex structure that shares links to other viruses including SARS. Although the articles do not make the assumption, covid-19 is a man made virus, the data suggests this is either a previously unknown mutation, or was derived in an unidentified host.

I found it much easier to access basic information on the history of viruses and information gathered on viruses in days when scientific study was in the cradle so to speak. If nothing else that information illustrates the lack of scientific data displayed by the media and government and how that lack of information has lead to catastrophic results throughout history.

Smallpox and Measles

Smallpox and measles viruses are among the oldest that infect humans. Having evolved from viruses that infected other animals, they first appeared in humans in Europe and North Africa thousands of years ago.

Black Plague

The virus, which only infected humans, probably descended from the poxviruses of rodents.[5] Humans probably came into contact with these rodents, and some people became infected by the viruses they carried. When viruses cross this so-called “species barrier”, their effects can be severe,[6] and humans may have had little natural resistance.

Plant Viruses

This agricultural revolution embraced the development of monoculture and presented an opportunity for the rapid spread of several species of plant viruses.[10] The divergence and spread of sobemoviruses – southern bean mosaic virus – date from this time.[11] The spread of the potyviruses of potatoes, and other fruits and vegetables, began about 6,600 years ago.


About 10,000 years ago the humans who inhabited the lands around the Mediterranean basin began to domesticate wild animals. Pigs, cattle, goats, sheep, horses, camels, cats and dogs were all kept and bred in captivity.[12] These animals would have brought their viruses with them.[13] The transmission of viruses from animals to humans can occur, but such zoonotic infections are rare and subsequent human-to-human transmission of animal viruses is even rarer, although there are notable exceptions such as influenza. Most viruses are species-specific and would have posed no threat to humans.[14] The rare epidemics of viral diseases originating in animals would have been short-lived because the viruses were not fully adapted to humans[15] and the human populations were too small to maintain the chains of infection.[16]

The influenza virus is one that seems to have crossed the species barrier from ducks and waterfowl to pigs and from there to humans.


The close similarities between measles virus, canine distemper virus and rinderpest virus have given rise to speculation that measles was first transmitted to humans from domesticated dogs or cattle.

Rinderpest, which is caused by a virus closely related to measles virus, is a disease of cattle known since Roman times.

Swine Influenza

In 1173, an epidemic occurred that was possibly the first in Europe, and in 1493, an outbreak of what is now thought to be swine influenza, struck Native Americans in Hispaniola. There is some evidence to suggest that source of the infection was pigs on Columbus’s ships.

Yellow fever

Yellow fever is an often lethal disease caused by a flavivirus. The virus is transmitted to humans by mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti) and first appeared over 3,000 years ago.


Until the Irish Great Famine of 1845–1852, the commonest cause of disease in potatoes was not the mould that causes blight, it was a virus. The disease, called “curl”, is caused by potato leafroll virus, and it was widespread in England in the 1770s, where it destroyed 75 per cent of the potato crop. At that time, the Irish potato crop remained relatively unscathed.


Rabies is an often fatal disease caused by the infection of mammals with rabies virus. In the 21st century it is mainly a disease that affects wild mammals such as foxes and bats, but it is one of the oldest known virus diseases: rabies is a Sanskrit word (rabhas) that dates from 3000 BC,[35] which means “madness” or “rage”,[31] and the disease has been known for over 4000 years.


Humans are the only natural host of measles virus.[148] Immunity to the disease following an infection is lifelong; that afforded by vaccination is long term but eventually wanes.


HIV crossed the species barrier between chimpanzees and humans in Africa in the early decades of the 20th century.


When influenza virus undergoes a genetic shift many humans have no immunity to the new strain, and if the population of susceptible individuals is high enough to maintain the chain of infection, pandemics occur. The genetic changes usually happen when different strains of the virus co-infect animals, particularly birds and swine. Although many viruses of vertebrates are restricted to one species, influenza virus is an exception.

Affecting mainly the elderly, the 1968 pandemic was the least severe, but 33,800 were killed in the US.[198] New strains of influenza virus often originate in East Asia; in rural China the concentration of ducks, pigs, and humans in close proximity is the highest in the world.


Arboviruses are viruses that are transmitted to humans and other vertebrates by blood-sucking insects. These viruses are diverse; the term “arbovirus” – which was derived from “arthropod-borne virus” – is no longer used in formal taxonomy because many species of virus are known to be spread in this way.[200] There are more than 500 species of arboviruses, but in the 1930s only three were known to cause disease in humans: yellow fever virus, dengue virus and Pappataci fever virus.[201] More than 100 of such viruses are now known to cause human diseases including encephalitis.


The discovery of hepatitis B virus and the invention of tests to detect it have radically changed many medical, and some cosmetic procedures. The screening of donated blood, which was introduced in the early 1970s, has dramatically reduced the transmission of the virus.[221] Donations of human blood plasma and Factor VIII collected before 1975 often contained infectious levels of hepatitis B virus.[222] Until the late 1960s, hypodermic needles were often reused by medical professionals, and tattoo artists’ needles were a common source of infection.[223] In the late 1990s, needle exchange programmes were established in Europe and the US to prevent the spread of infections by intravenous drug users.[224] These measures also helped to reduce the subsequent impact of HIV and hepatitis C virus.


The natural hosts of influenza viruses are pigs and birds, although it has probably infected humans since antiquity.[244] The virus can cause mild to severe epizootics in wild and domesticated animals.[245] Many species of wild birds migrate and this has spread influenza across the continents throughout the ages. The virus has evolved into numerous strains and continues to do so, posing an ever-present threat.


During the 20th century, many “old” diseases of plants were found to be caused by viruses. These included maize streak and cassava mosaic disease.[249] As with humans, when plants thrive in close proximity, so do their viruses. This can cause huge economic losses and human tragedies. In Jordan during the 1970s, where tomatoes and cucurbits (cucumbers, melons and gourds) were extensively grown, entire fields were infected with viruses.[250] Similarly, in Côte d’Ivoire, thirty different viruses infected crops such as legumes and vegetables. In Kenya cassava mosaic virus, maize streak virus and groundnut viral diseases caused the loss of up to 70 per cent of the crop.[250] Cassava is the most abundant crop that is grown in eastern Africa and it is a staple crop for more than 200 million people. It was introduced to Africa from South America and grows well in soils with poor fertility. The most important disease of cassava is caused by cassava mosaic virus, a geminivirus, which is transmitted between plants by whiteflies. The disease was first recorded in 1894 and outbreaks of the disease occurred in eastern Africa throughout the 20th century, often resulting in famine.

Such disasters occurred when human intervention caused ecological changes by the introduction of crops to new vectors and viruses. Cacao is native to South America and was introduced to West Africa in the late 19th century. In 1936, swollen root disease had been transmitted to plantations by mealybugs from indigenous trees.[256] New habitats can trigger outbreaks of plant virus diseases. Before 1970, the rice yellow mottle virus was only found in the Kisumu district of Kenya, but following the irrigation of large areas of East Africa and extensive rice cultivation, the virus spread throughout East Africa.[257] Human activity introduced plant viruses to native crops. The citrus tristeza virus (CTV) was introduced to South America from Africa between 1926 and 1930. At the same time, the aphid Toxoptera citricidus was carried from Asia to South America and this accelerated the transmission of the virus. By 1950, more than six million citrus trees had been killed by the virus in São Paulo, Brazil.[257] CTV and citrus trees probably coevolved for centuries in their original countries. The dispersal of CTV to other regions and its interaction with new citrus varieties resulted in devastating outbreaks of plant diseases.[258] Because of the problems caused by the introduction – by humans – of plant viruses, many countries have strict importation controls on any materials that can harbour dangerous plant viruses or their insect vectors.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a new type of coronavirus.[264] Other coronaviruses were known to cause mild infections in humans,[265] so the virulence and rapid spread of this novel virus strain caused alarm among health professionals as well as public fear.[260] The fears of a major pandemic were not realised, and by July 2003, after causing around 8,000 cases and 800 deaths, the outbreak had ended.[266] The exact origin of the SARS virus is not known, but evidence suggests that it came from bats.

A related coronavirus emerged in Wuhan, China in November 2019 and spread rapidly around the world. Subsequently named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, infections with the virus caused a pandemic with a case fatality rate of around 2% in healthy people under the age of 50, to around 15% in those aged over 80 particularly those with pre-existing comorbidities.[268][269][270] As of October 2021, the fatality rate is lower than SARS but the infection is more contagious.[268] Measures to curtail the impact of the pandemic were hampered by fear and prejudice and stigmatisation of infected people.[271] Unprecedented restrictions in peacetime have been placed on international travel,[272] and curfews imposed in several major cities worldwide.[273] Governments were not prepared for the scale of the pandemic and worldwide, virology and epidemiology experts were complacent with regards to the efficiency of existing testing and monitoring systems.

After rodents, bats are the second most diverse and abundant mammalian order, comprising 20% of all mammalian biodiversity worldwide. In the past 2 decades, research has intensified to determine why bats harbor more zoonotic diseases than other mammalian taxa, including pathogens that result in high-consequence infectious diseases, such as Ebola and Marburg filoviruses; Nipah and Hendra paramyxoviruses; and SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV, emerging in humans (15). Behavioral and ecologic traits, such as their gregariousness, sympatry with mixed species assemblages in roosts, and long lifespan relative to size, have been suggested explanations for why bats are reservoirs to many viral pathogens (15). Physiologically, bats have comparatively high metabolic rates and typically do not show clinical signs after viral infection. Recently, it has also been shown that bats have several immune characteristics that are unique among mammals and that cumulatively dampen their antiviral responses (16). Those factors also probably contribute to their effectiveness as viral reservoirs.


Livestock can also be spillover hosts of human coronavirus infection. After the 2002–2003 SARS outbreak, a study conducted on farms in Xiqing County, China, tested livestock (pigs, cattle, chickens, and ducks) and companion animals (dogs and cats), leading to detection of 1 pig that was positive for SARS-CoV by antibody test and reverse transcription PCR (30) (Table 2). A larger and more complex series of livestock outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 has been unfolding since April 2020. Mink farms across Europe and North America have reported outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 (Tables 2, 3). In most outbreaks, farmed mink were suspected to be initially infected by COVID-19–positive farm employees (31,32). Findings from the Netherlands have also identified instances of spillback from mink to humans through ongoing investigations (33). National surveillance and control efforts have been implemented in several countries, many of which have subsequently identified other SARS-CoV-2–positive species living on or nearby mink farms, including cats, dogs, and escaped or wild mink (32). Several countries have implemented mandatory reporting of any virus-positive animals and depopulation or quarantine of affected farms (32). In Europe, several million mink have been culled, and a moratorium has been placed on the mink industry in some countries; such early and coordinated One Health actions are needed to prevent bidirectional transmission of zoonotic diseases

Phylogenetic analysis showed that bat-derived coronaviruses fell within all five subgenera of the genus Betacoronavirus. Moreover, bat-derived coronaviruses fell in basal positions in the subgenus Sarbecovirus, with 2019-nCoV most closely related to bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21, which were also sampled from bats.23 These data are consistent with a bat reservoir for coronaviruses in general and for 2019-nCoV in particular. However, despite the importance of bats, several facts suggest that another animal is acting as an intermediate host between bats and humans. First, the outbreak was first reported in late December, 2019, when most bat species in Wuhan are hibernating. Second, no bats were sold or found at the Huanan seafood market, whereas various non-aquatic animals (including mammals) were available for purchase. Third, the sequence identity between 2019-nCoV and its close relatives bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21 was less than 90%, which is reflected in the relatively long branch between them. Hence, bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21 are not direct ancestors of 2019-nCoV. Fourth, in both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, bats acted as the natural reservoir, with another animal (masked palm civet for SARS-CoV35 and dromedary camels for MERS-CoV)36 acting as an intermediate host, with humans as terminal hosts. Therefore, on the basis of current data, it seems likely that the 2019-nCoV causing the Wuhan outbreak might also be initially hosted by bats, and might have been transmitted to humans via currently unknown wild animal(s) sold at the Huanan seafood market.

Based on scientific information collected over hundreds of years we clearly see, scientists and doctors have been able to identify the source of viruses long before the invention of scientific devises available today. The question needs to be asked, why have scientists with limited resources been able to solve mysteries long before modern medicine, but modern technology remains baffled by the origin of covid-19. Since the 1960’s science has been to quickly identify the source of every virus within days or weeks of detection. But with the origin of covid-19 the media took main stage with their own analysis of the situation and came up with what seemed a logical conclusion, covid-19 originated in bats. A theory that has been proven false by a number of scientific studies. Those same detailed studies with all their funding, instruments, and technology have not been able to determine the origin of covid-19. Based on the link and sub-links provided in those studies, we clearly see a worldwide effort to solve this dilemma with zero credible results. The fact that no one has drawn the conclusion, covid-19 is a man made virus adds credibility to those studies. It proves scientists have been true to their profession by not establishing a result before beginning an investigation. An attribute we wish was shared by modern media and governments around the world.

Feel free to use and share these quotes.Reagan Quote

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Did you know a medical study confirmed and published by JAMA in June of 2020 showed that people confined to homes, experienced loss of jobs and income due to shut downs and closing were twice as likely to suffer from exposure to covid 19 than people who socialized in the community and at work. In simple English, shut downs and confinement doubled the chances of suffering sickness requiring medical attention for sever complications caused by covid 19.

The study shows how shut downs, confinements, loss of jobs, and income result is increased mental problems. Which is perfectly logical. Lock downs and business closing cause people to worry. Which in turn effects sleep, the immune system, and cause other physical ailments. This study shows what common sense should have told the world before they jumped to such drastic measures. The question is, why didn’t governments use a measure of common sense before following the harsh recommendations given by self appointed experts who should have been reading this study and monitoring similar studies.

For months we have been told, “to follow the science.” Since June of 2020 we have only been told bits and pieces of that science. Recommendations, executives orders, shut downs, and stay at home orders have been issued across the world. Studies like this show how those measures do little to nothing to curb the spread of covid. On the contrary, they accelerate the number of sever cases caused by covid.

Prevalence of and Risk Factors Associated With Mental Health Symptoms Among the General Population in China During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Findings In this survey study with 56 679 participants across all 34 province-level regions in China, 27.9% of participants had symptoms of depression, 31.6% had symptoms of anxiety, 29.2% had symptoms of insomnia, and 24.4% had symptoms of acute stress during the outbreak.

Importance People exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and a series of imperative containment measures could be psychologically stressed, yet the burden of and factors associated with mental health symptoms remain unclear.

The present study identified several population groups who were likely to develop mental health symptoms. Compared with uninfected people, those with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 were 2 to 3 times more likely to report mental health symptoms.

Individuals with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 had at least twice the risk for the mental health symptoms compared with those not infected with COVID-19

The present study also found that people with occupational exposure risks reported greater symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and acute stress. People who work in high-risk environments often report more fatigue, health worries, and fear. COVID-19 may be symptomless during the incubation period, and its clinical manifestations can be easily confused with those of normal influenza.

Another prominent finding was the substantial impact of quarantine experience on mental health, which is consistent with prior studies. Quarantine can contribute to poor mental health in both children and adults. People may experience fear of infection, frustration, and boredom during quarantine. Insufficient basic supplies and disruptions of information flow can increase both fear and anxiety.

A high probability of symptoms of depression and anxiety was found among people who had not yet returned to work. Among people who had returned to work, those who worked at home had a higher risk of mental health symptoms compared with those who did not work at home.

Accepted for Publication: June 8, 2020.

The surprising thing is, this study was conducted in China. Another surprising fact is this study was released on July 1, 2020 and no one has shared this study with the public. Has anyone followed up on this study? Do other studies exist? Do people in the government know about this study but are waiting for the proper time to end shut downs, watch sever symptoms of covid 19 disappear and take credit for saving the world? What about all the covid deaths between July 2020, and when the government puts an end to shut downs and lock downs that have been accelerating effects?

This study raises more questions than provides answers. Early studies showed covid-19 is triggered by chemicals released in the body under stress. Which points to covid 19 being a designer drug. Are studies looking at the effects of stress on covid 19 and how they interact?

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Chapter 17 The Perfect Republic

We can only imagine what President Kennedy had in mind when he set out to improve education and motivate American voters to cast an educated vote. We do know that is why President Kennedy was assassinated. Some think it may have been socialist or communists. We cannot overlook American political figures hiding in the democratic and republican parties. Both parties have their share of power hungry individuals with supreme power on their minds and agenda. They fear educated voters.

I live by a set of simple principles. A man is only as good as his word. A hand shake is as good as any signed contract. Government is a necessary evil. The smaller the government the better. A government is only as good as the voters involvement before, during, and after an election. And one more. If the world thought like me, it would be a perfect place to live.

What would a perfect republic consist of? What would it look like? What would a perfect republic have for a government? How would the prefect republic serve the people? We’ve never really seen the perfect republic. The founding fathers of the US had visions. But early US history shows how President Washington had problems with congress. And those problems grew over the years. The authors of the Constitution wrote about their personal concepts and visions for the future. They wrote about the advantages they saw and their fears. We may all have our personal views on a perfect republic. How were those viewed formed? Where did those concepts come from? America had its share of great leaders with unusual concepts of freedom. One detail stood out above all, education.

By far education is the key to a free society and the perfect republic. To be a perfect republic America needs the most advanced education system in the world. That would take revamping the majority of the present education system from top to bottom. In the prefect republic instructors will teach from experience. My dad was an instructor. He was in charge of a company of instructors in the army and always said, “no one can ever teach something they have never experienced.” I know that’s true. I’ve taken classes from both experienced instructors and carrier teachers with no personal experience in life or what they were teaching. Instructors with practical experience go beyond the book into reality and real life experiences. This is especially essential when research is required such as engineering, science, medial, culinary, design, and other carries. Instructors with experience normally posses the drive to see their students advance to a higher level than what they have been able to achieve. In the perfect republic top people in every position of every business would consider it an honor to pass their experience onto others. Because the teaching profession would be a secondary carrier, education costs would be low. The majority of teachers would be semi-retired professionals from all fields. With their retirement funds secure, the teaching field would be another wrung on their carrier ladder. Teaching would be a way of giving back to the community. Of course teachers would undergo vigorous training to prepare them for the classroom. Quality would be second to none in this world. Low education costs would eliminate the need for middleman lenders and school loans. All educational costs would be tax deductible and to attract the brightest and most promising work force, companies would offer education assistance programs. For the most part the education system would see little government involvement.

In political circles the perfect republic would feature low taxes. In a perfect republic there would be no wasted spending, no special interest groups, and absolutely no theft from US taxpayers on any level. In a perfect republic every elected representative would strive to offer the best services, the best products, and complete every project to the highest level of qualify in every area from road maintenance to defense. Every person along every phase of every project would work to eliminate over spending, waste, and less than quality work, services, equipment, and products. In the perfect republic every vendor and supplier would consider it an honor to serve their country in every capacity they are involved. In the perfect republic it would be an honor to serve in public office. Such an honor, every elected official in America would limit their service to one or two terms. Respect for their fellow Americans would call them to step down and allow others to share in that honor. In the prefect republic new representatives at every level would have an deep pool of knowledge and experience to draw upon. Because in a republic, elected representatives rely on the input of those they represent. Any republic that fails to take advantage of that fact is doomed to fail.

The perfect republic would require few new laws. All the people would live their life guided by honesty, fair play, and helping their fellow Americans. It would be the duty of each citizen to help their fellow American. Trust is worth more than gold. No one would be caught dead taking advantage of another person. Scammers would not exist. Elected officials would never have to spend countless hours going over new laws and measures that take the place of common sense. More time would be spent mingling among the people who elected them. In the perfect republic the world would see the true definition of a public servant.

In the prefect republic prisons would be few and far between. The individual conscience and fear of social isolation would keep everyone in check. Committing a crime, any crime would be looked down upon by every member of society. Lies would be as great a crime as murder. Jails would be local. Of course there will always be judgment errors in society. But in the perfect republic, individuals among the educated masses would never commit any premeditated crime. The results of any premeditated crime would always lead to more shame than any human is able to bear. Local jail systems would work hand in hand with the education system. Those found guilty of crimes would have access to the best education in the world to ensure time spent in prison would be time spent rebuilding a better life.

In the perfect republic the media would be known as a trusted source of information. Every story would be checked and double checked to insure the facts are unbiased and backed up by reliable sources. In the prefect republic the media would follow its own ethics code to ensure the service they supply to the public is second to none. No politician would ever dream of using the media to sling mud or hurl baseless accusations at an opponent. In the perfect republic politicians would not rely on advertising to win an election. Their track record, beliefs on policies, and public life would be open records for all to view. Elections would be determined by facts, not by the amount of money one candidate would be able to spend. In the prefect republic money would never form a connection between candidates and the media.

Business would be quite different under the perfect republic. When justice, honesty, and trust prevail, businesses of all types would rely on practicing those qualities to compete. When one slip up could cost an individual their business, you have to believe every business owner would fall in line when it comes to general business practices. The government model emphasizing local government would be followed by businesses. Local independent businesses would be present in every community. Independent businesses would flourish. Car repair, doctors, dentists, construction, maintenance, and repairs of all types would be trusted to the local professionals. The revamped education system would guarantee the latest knowledge, know how, and technology in all areas of business. The prefect republic would eliminate corporate greed and the problems that follow. To understand the concept of business under the perfect republic, we have to review the conditions under which the US was formed.

Before there was a United States, America was made up of colonies. In short those local colonies were controlled by English businesses who paid the king fees to gain total control of a particular area in the new land. No one was allowed to buy or sell without permission from the local governor, a man appointed by the owner of the English company. Everything the colony needed was imported by the English company that of course set prices. All exports went through the same English company who of course set the purchase price of every product grown and manufactured in the colony for export. The same was true for every good and service traded within and outside the colony. Bartering for goods and services was often deemed illegal by the English company. In essence, the colony had to deal with a monopoly. Governors had total control over everything that was bought and sold. Based on what we’ve seen during this corona crisis, many US governors don’t know their US history. As we can see, many of the protesters who were against emergency laws imposed by governors knew US history and felt it was their duty to remind the governors about the repression that sparked the revolutionary war.

The United States sprang from the idea and concept that every person was free to establish and run their own business free of government control. Not everyone was going to own their own business, but when enough businesses were established people had a choice on who they wanted to work for. An increase in businesses opened up opportunities for everyone. That was a concept our founding fathers saw. The prefect republic would follow that idea and take it to the next level.

The perfect republic would have minimum government involvement in business. Supply and demand would set and establish prices. Public image would mold corporate decisions to protect the environment. Everything draws back to education. Education to produce products as safely as possible for the employees and environment. In the perfect republic negligence on any level would spell disaster for any company. We would not need government rules and regulations to control every facet of business. Private organizations to promote worker safety and environmental protection would cover the majority of issues. Of course, mistakes and negligence would spell doom for any company. Business owners with blinders manufactured by profit would soon find themselves without workers and customers. Moral standards would shape the entire economy.

This all sounds like a dream. But a dream that would soon become a reality if people trusted one another, respected one another, and learned to work together. The perfect republic is not built upon votes, broken promises, taxes, nor laws. The perfect republic is built on morals. If everyone shared the same morals and worked in the same direction, anything could be accomplished and everything would be accomplished. Take out the senseless laws, taxes, and greed that chain down America and what would we have? A totally different world. A world people say is an impossible dream few have shared. Martian Luther King, John Kennedy, and Robert Kennedy all shared that dream. They talked about it. The wrote about it. They tried to pass laws to make it a reality. All three have one more thing in common. They were all killed by greed. And the nation has been engulfed in that greed for over 60 years. Are we going to allow three bullets to control America, or are we the people going to shape the American dream and make it a reality?

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

The Political View Verses the Moral View

Let’s face the facts. On the political side we do have opposing factions who insist they follow God. Some insist they hear God and are following God’s commands. Others insist they are guided by moral convictions established by religious beliefs. And of course we have a vast majority of Americans who believe we need a President, and of course a government guided by God. The vast majority of Americans believe we need a government who is going to make the right decisions, and somehow make the United States a country that looks after the interest of its people, treats everyone fairly, taxes fairly, has a strong defense, helps other countries, and is wise enough so other countries do not take advantage of our generosity. Is that asking for too much?

When we mix religion with politics in an election year, we know there will be reactions. This is nothing new. John Kennedy addressed that question when he ran for President.

John Kennedy discussed some rather valid points. Religion is personal. Each candidate has the same right to worship as they choose. Candidates have the same rights as every US citizen. John Kennedy went on to point out, if one religion is persecuted by the media or special interest groups, which religion will they persecute tomorrow? One of the best points John Kennedy pointed out is to vote for a President based on their personal convictions, not based on their religion. But that takes research. My dad taught us how to research a politician. Back in the 1960’s we had politicians to look up to and use as a measuring stick to compare others. Bill Proxmire was one of those rare politicians.

Proxmire was one of those rare one of a kind politicians with ethics nearly beyond belief. Proxmire lived and mingled among the people he represented. He won elections by a landslide. His biggest campaign expense was to pay for stamps to send campaign contributions back to people. Proxmire was a rare breed in Washington always pointing out wasteful spending. Not just millions of dollar on huge projects, but instances where just a few thousand dollars was wasted. Proxmire was a guy who told it like it was and didn’t back down from anyone. Today Proxmire would be labeled a whistle blower. The people in Wisconsin considered Senator Proxmire a man doing the job he was sent to Washington to do. I grew up in Wisconsin being rather naive thinking we always had a group of politicians like Proxmire in Washington battling another group of crooked politicians from elsewhere in this country. But I was wrong. Proxmire was a rare breed. One of a kind.

We can take a look at what the 2020 political scene has to offer. A strong contender for the White House was an open communist, or socialist based on the particular policy. Communists are typically anti-religion, which suggest threats to rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Historically socialists restrict religions to state approved religions. The fact a number of US voters approved of socialism and communism during primary elections should be a real concern for all American voters. Bernie Sanders was brought up Jewish parents, but his interest in Hitler and the Nazi government he installed and how he was elected is not only strange, bazaar, but alarming. Since we should be learning from the words and advice of former Presidents, I cannot see how so many voters missed the messages about the religious persecution past Presidents had to face. We’ve gone through three Presidents who have sent troops overseas to protect people from religious persecution. It is rather shocking for so many voters to look at those sacrifices as unnecessary. Warnings repeated by those last three Presidents included the fact, “it may be one group today. Will it be you tomorrow?”

John Kennedy had his facts straight when he told voters to judge a candidate by their moral convictions. How are we supposed to determine a person’s conviction? Is it by the promises they make? We have seen too many lies from politicians to accept promises. We should be smarter than that. How do those promises align with their life style? Using Sanders as an example, we see a politician telling the public, “rich people will pay for your essentials.” Does that include his millions? Sanders also teaches us another important fact. We need to check out the facts and figures they discuss and post on their websites. Sanders proposed 11 trillion dollars worth of programs. A figure equal to the combined income of every taxpayer in 2018. A figure and fact the media was either too lazy to investigate, or knew about and wanted to hide from the public.

Joe Biden is a little tough to gauge on convictions. He is a Roman Catholic and practices his faith.

Joe Biden lost members of his family over the years and faced more than many of us will in a lifetime. As with most candidates, his voting record varies.

The fact Biden goes against religious convictions on some issues raises a red flag with some voters, but to other voters it tells them Biden is a man who thinks on his own and makes his own decisions.

The socialist factor with Biden should raise some red flags and call for caution. Joe Biden called his installation of a Democracy in Ukraine his greatest accomplishment. Biden actually experimented with a democratic-socialist government in Ukraine that was over thrown in 2014. Investigations into his son’s business activity in Ukraine are now on hold until after US elections. Time will tell what those investigations reveal.

Another key figure in the political arena today with a strong religious conviction is Nancy Pelosi. Based on the fact she refers to herself as the most powerful woman in America, and at times, the world, urges us to look at her moral convictions. We have to consult a number of sources when we look into Pelosi’s life.

Pelosi, who had been walking away from the podium, exploded. She pointed a finger at Rosen and said, “I don’t hate anybody. I was raised in a Catholic house. We don’t hate anybody.”

Then she added, “And as a Catholic, I resent your using the word ‘hate’ in a sentence that addresses me. I pray for the president all the time. So don’t mess with me when it comes to words like that.”

When we compare basic Catholic values to Pelosi’s political views and career, we see two completely distant worlds. The focus being on Catholic views dealing with homosexuality, marriage, and abortion. Pelosi has chosen to cast away religious views on those subjects and take on, for lack of a better term, a completely radical view. To some this shift in moral conviction indicates a strength in a woman. One reporter compared that strength to a motherly figure. Although that reporter did no agree with Pelosi’s political views, he did appreciate her fierceness. The individual voter has to decide between that fierce attitude and her talk about moral convictions, religious guides, and actually performance. Do opposite poles indicate an imbalance in moral convictions, or an attitude that attracts votes.

Pelosi never liked President Trump and has had no problem making that fact public. “Donald Trump is not going to be President of the United States,” Pelosi said on the latest episode of Recode Decode, hosted by Kara Swisher. “Take it to the bank, I guarantee it.” She said that she is urging her Republican friends to “take back your party.” In response to the proposal that Trump uses social media better than other politicians, Pelosi blamed ratings-hungry media outlets for amplifying his visibility.

“Social media has democratized elections even further,” she added. “People hear things that may or may not be true, but nonetheless, the democratization of communication is good for a democracy.”

Pelosi may be the best of the best when it comes to a politician, saying one thing, doing another, accusing a person of something, then taking that crime to a whole new level. On one hand she condemns Trump for using social media, blames the press, then turns around and takes social media and fake news to a whole new level to accomplish her goals. If nothing else, an examination of Pelosi’s life and morals shows a deep conviction of double standards. Perfectly acceptable to herself, but an unforgivable sin and the high crime of treason when used by anyone else. To understand Pelosi’s mindset and motivation, we have to look at her modern day concept of a democracy.

We can scan the internet, study 30 articles on the definition of a democracy and walk away with 30 conflicting concepts. This is a ploy used during the French Revolution when the conquering class executed the ruling aristocrats, installed a new government, and made reason their god.

The main point to learn from that revolution of reason is, the French rewrote their dictionary turning the definitions of a number of words upside down. A new form of political control was born. When people believe right is wrong, and evil used for the good of the people is acceptable, those people of course become confused with no where to turn for answers but their leaders. The moral convictions of people as a whole is destroyed. With no real moral compass to follow, the people put their trust in leaders who in essence have free reign to constantly contradict themselves while leaving the impression their questionable actions are somehow, someday, going to benefit the people they represent. Which is basically the definition of a democracy.

The French revolution set up the acceptance of an anarchy to achieve the perfect society. The belief that good will eventually spring from the bowels of total darkness was a political tool this world has learned to live with, accept, and sad to say, believe in. The world has learned to accept political figures whose actions never seem to reflect their words and promises. Voters all over the world have learned to sit, wait, and hope someday something good has to happen. And voters all over the world have learned to accept the fact, nothing will ever change. No matter what we do, we are at the mercy of the people we elected. And they are not who they say they are.

Today we can take the two terms, liberal and conservative. Both have lost their meaning because they are applied and misapplied at will. The two political parties in the US use the terms liberal and conservative at will to serve their purpose at the time. No one really knows what each of those words mean. People apply their own definitions and like politicians, often flip flop the definitions of those two words to suit the circumstances of the moment.

Democracy is a word that has been misapplied, reapplied, and for all intents and purposes, redefined in conflicting manners to confuse the average voter. Voters all over the world have accepted the fact politicians apply one meaning to a democracy, then apply a completely different definition when they formulate and vote on policies and laws. Politicians tell people a democracy defines freedom. Then they apply laws, restrictions, taxes, and policies to restrict and control basic freedoms. Within their private chambers a democracy takes on a completely different definition. Behind closed doors a democracy is a form of government where elected officials rule the voters. We see that belief rear its ugly head in the new, emergency stay at home laws and orders. For all intents and purposes, the world is under martial law. In the eyes of politicians, no one is able to protect themselves. Politicians actually believe they are the only people on earth able to examine the situation and make a decision. Governments on all levels treat people like children unable to protect themselves, or make a rational decision. Then politicians pass laws and set restrictions to protect the general public from the minority of people unable to follow directions, protect themselves, have any rational thought, and have no respect for others. In essence, politicians today are showing the world how easy it is for them to abuse their power and justify their abuse of power by actually thinking it will somehow turn out for the good of all people. Politicians have blurred the definition of a democracy by shifting it to a totalitarian government. Mixing the two for what they believe is the greater good of the people. To further their control, politicians have convinced themselves, the public does not understand. They convince themselves they need to seize total control because they are the only people alive who understand the situation, and they are the knight in shinning armor placed on the throne to save the kingdom. Today we can see what to expect when a democracy is defined as, the decision of those in control is final and punishment must be inflicted to get the point across. Today we see what a democracy is when unquestioned control is necessary to guarantee a safe and secure society.

The sum it up in my own terms, the modern definition of a democracy is when people are elected to determine the direction of society as a whole. The people are directed by those they elect. In traditional terms, a republic is when elected officials are still bound to the will of the people. In a republic, after elections, decisions and policies are still shaped by the people.

John Kennedy offered a unique vision of a republic. Faced with one major issue, segregation and the prejudice it comes with, Kennedy, the youngest President ever elected, was faced with a daunting task. Knowing prejudice and segregation sprang from the evolutionary theories conjured up in the late 1850’s President Kennedy knew he had to reeducate a vast number of Americans who used the evolutionary theories to fuel segregation. It may have been Kennedy’s religious background that fueled his desire to overcome the social issues his administration faced. Knowing evolution was a theory, Kennedy looked at how man made theories and concepts shaped opinions. Some called evolution a science. Although evolution did not fit the definition of science. Evolution could not be proven. There was no evidence, nor was there any way to conduct any scientific tests. So evolution was never anything more than an opinion. An opinion people used to justify segregation and a host of crimes against humanity and establish a double standard of freedom in America. Kennedy had no choice but to follow his convictions and the only solution to those issues. To dispel any belief in man made theories and rely on cold, hard facts. Education and science were the only weapons Kennedy had to fight with.

In a way, everything was in place for Kennedy to spark a new, progressive scientific revolution everyone could benefit from. Kennedy was a WWII war veteran. He was surrounded by a political atmosphere of WWII veterans who took the battles against inequality to the home front. Opposition was high, but a few footholds were gained. During and after WWII blacks as well as Asians, and other nationalities were still looked down upon. The main excuse was evolution. Many whites believed they were a superior race. Sure the US just defeated Hitler and his dreams to create a pure Aryan race to rule the world. But that mentality was still alive and thriving in the US. Another double standard of thinking widely accepted by you guessed it, those who benefited the most. Somehow Kennedy had to change the mindset of the average American white person. Education and science were the keys.

Equal education was the first step. Whites implemented separate but equal education out of fear and ignorance. Ignorance because evolution told them blacks will never advance as far as whites. Fear because one black man could disprove the entire evolutionary theory.

John Kennedy was in the right spot at the right time. He had to first get the American people to focus on science. An idea is a theory until proven. Then it becomes a fact. John Kennedy put all of his eggs in one basket by announcing a plan to send a man to the moon. At that time, a man on the moon was a concept, an unproven theory. Kennedy had infant computers and a host of scientists to work with. Rockets were in their early stages and to create and launch a rocket of the size required was at that time, basically unproven. A few satellites later and that stage was set. In the 1960’s a trip to the moon was on a rather fast pace. They also had to deal with the theory of weightlessness in space. Another theory science needed to prove. One after another science showed the world exactly how to prove a theory. Science fed into the equal rights movement as if God had a hand in taking the minimum and turning it into a world changing event.

On the political front President Kennedy had a vision of the perfect republic. A government founded on the idea of educated voters. To achieve that goal, the American public had to accept President Kennedy’s concept of continuing education and the concept that every living being has something to contribute. President Kennedy summed up his moral convictions in a few words.

Only an educated and informed people will be a free people. John F. Kennedy’s Remarks in Nashville at the 90th Anniversary Convocation of Vanderbilt University (18 May 1963).

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man. John F. Kennedy’s Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961

Almost 40 years later people are still speculating on who shot President Kennedy. We may never ever know who was behind President Kennedy’s assassination, but we do know why he was assassinated. The concept of a total republic not lead by elected officials, but an educated and motivated society struck fear in the hearts of every crooked politician waiting for things to get back to their idea of normal so they could get back to making money the old fashion way – steal it.

President Kennedy used the moon trip to define science, establish the difference between fact and theory and give evolution a black eye. With that accomplished, his administration turned its attention on the two concepts of freedom closest to his heart. The reeducation of America was kindled. From the hearts and minds of educated Americans a new government structure was on the horizon. A government where every elected official not only depends on but thrives on input and ideas from the people who pay their salaries.

Based on the fact those concepts cost President Kennedy his life, we can see how far politicians will go to protect their interests. Interests that are threatened by well educated voters. I often wonder how John Kennedy’s concepts, ideals, and moral conviction would be accepted today. President Kennedy was lucky. He was President in a day and age of professional journalism was expected and demanded by the general public. Quite the opposite of today.

Update May 9th 2020

May 8th marked the 75th anniversary of VE day. Today most people have no idea what VE day is. VE stands for Victory in Europe and marked the end of WWII in Europe. President Trump held a few ceremonies to commemorate the day. They were not covered by any US media. A few European newspapers covered the event. But nothing in America. It is as if WWII never happened. Has fakes news infected the US media that badly? Has socialism gotten such a grip on the US that it is no longer politically correct to celebrate a day that draws attention to the fact the US fought a war against socialism. To socialism ignorance in bliss. A republic relies on education to survive.

Monday, February 19th, will be celebrated as Presidents’ Day. One of the recurring themes of most presidents of the United States is the absolute necessity of making sure our people are educated. They have varied opinions on how that is to be accomplished, but most have seemed to agree that a free society can only survive as a republic if the people maintain a program of general education. Can we not hear our first three presidents say this? “A primary object should be the education of our youth in the science of government. In a republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important? And what duty more pressing than communicating it to those who are to be the future guardians of the liberties of the country?” – George Washington “Educate and inform the whole mass of the people. Enable them to see that it is their interest to preserve peace and order, and they will preserve them. And it requires no very high degree of education to convince them of this. They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.” – Thomas Jefferson “Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people…. They have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge — I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers.” – John Adams

Parts of Europe have banned VE-DAY celebrations. America forgot VE-Day and Europe banned it. Has it become political incorrect to celebrate the end of a war when socialism got their asses kicked?

Today we can clearly see which politicians really believe they were elected to carry out the will of the people and which think they were elected to rule over people. View a few of Pelosi’s videos and you can tell her idea of the perfect government is an ant colony. There is one queen, guard ants, and worker ants. Today many consider an ant colony as the perfect example of a democracy.

Imagine what this country would be like today if President Kennedy was able to follow his mission in life, to create a country with well educated voters having their voices heard between elections. We still have that system. It is called town hall meetings. Elected officials travel from town to town to hear what people think. I’ve been going to those for years. I have see the attitudes of politicians change over the years. I also noticed something else. It is rare to see a young person in those meetings. And if you do see a young person, their questions and comments are normally along a socialist lines. And always based on some less than reputable website. That was not the vision President Kennedy had.

Kennedy’s narrow election victory and small working margin in Congress left him cautious. He was reluctant to lose southern support for legislation on many fronts by pushing too hard on civil rights legislation. Instead, he appointed unprecedented numbers of African Americans to high-level positions in the administration and strengthened the Civil Rights Commission. He spoke out in favor of school desegregation, praised a number of cities for integrating their schools, and put Vice President Lyndon Johnson in charge of the President’s Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity. Attorney General Robert Kennedy turned his attention to voting rights, initiating five times the number of suits brought during the previous administration.

On May 25, 1961, Kennedy addressed a joint session of Congress to announce his decision to go to the moon. He backed up this decision with remarkable financial commitments. In the immediate aftermath of his speech, NASA’s budget was increased by 89 percent, and by another 101 percent the following year. To carry out Apollo, NASA became the large engineering organization centered on developing capabilities for human space flight that it is today.

Scholarships — Eligibility

S. 539 — Public Law 87-153, approved August 17, 1961

Permits legally classified American nationals to qualify and receive financial assistance under the Fulbright Act for advanced education abroad.

The Kennedys decided to submit civil rights legislation to Congress, and they began a series of meetings with congressional leaders to see what might have a chance of passing. After Birmingham, Jack realized that the “terrible problem” was “going to get worse and worse and had to be dealt with.”

Jack was also undoubtedly responding to a harsh public attack by Martin Luther King, who said that Kennedy had been as ineffective in civil rights as Eisenhower. Above all, King declared, the president should start talking about integration in moral terms, showing him capable of rising above politics.

Jack announced that he would soon be submitting far-reaching legislation to Congress that would integrate public accommodations, hasten school desegregation, and add protection for the right to vote.

Appeals were made to the Golden Rule. “In short, every American ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his children be treated.”

Americans have regarded education as the keystone of the American democratic

experience. Indeed, federal involvement in education pre-dates the Constitution. It was

explicitly encouraged by the Congress of the Confederation in the Survey Ordinance of

1785 and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787.

In a Special Message to the Congress on Education, delivered on February 6, 1962, Kennedy laid out his argument that education in this country is the right—the necessity—and the responsibility—of all.

June 11, 1963, President John F. Kennedy gave a televised address to the American people and announced that he would be sending a civil rights bill to Congress. His bill would become the most-far reaching act of legislation supporting racial equality in American history. Beginning in the 1950s, African Americans had been engaged in peaceful demonstrations to protest segregation and discrimination, but had encountered violence and resistance. The turmoil through the South prompted the president to take action. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed racial segregation in public accommodations including hotels, restaurants, theaters, and stores, and made employment discrimination illegal. President Lyndon Johnson signed the bill on July 2, 1964. This exhibit summarizes some of the historical events that influenced the passage of this legislation.

Kennedy focused in three major areas, education, the space program, and civil rights. This seems like a rather odd combination of interests. Although a man would not step food on the moon until 1969, we have to ask the question, did President Kennedy use the space program to advance civil rights?

We know the theory of evolution was looked upon as fact by those who needed an excuse to execute wide spread prejudice over the land. It was the only argument they had to stand on. On paper slavery had been abolished for nearly 100 years.

Strange as it may seem a man named Charles Darwin published his book on evolution only a few tears before Congress passed a law abolishing slavery. Darwin’s book gave slave owners what they needed, an excuse to act as masters over one section of mankind.

Although nothing is specifically written on the subject, did President Kennedy have a plan to use the space program and the science behind it to teach America the difference between a theory and fact. When we look at what it took to send a man to the moon and safely return him, we can see how science had to prove one theory after another. Calculations to launch a rocket and capsule of that size was a theory until proven. Gravity on the moon was a theory until proven. There was no way to get the amount of fuel needed to leave earth’s atmosphere onto the moon. Scientists had to rely on theories to calculate the moon’s gravity and the amount of fuel required to lift off from the moon and propel that capsule back to earth. The trip to and from the moon was based on theories science had to prove as fact. Was President Kennedy planning on using the space program to show mankind the difference between theories and facts? It was going to take a miracle to change minds on civil rights. For a hundred years mankind had been using the theory of evolution as a crutch to limp trough their excuses for segregation. Although President Kennedy was the youngest President in the US, he had visions few people possessed. Sad to say, his visions were what killed him. What would have life been like of President Kennedy was able to achieve his dreams?

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Battles Over the Constitution

Time to call out the white elephant in the room. Let’s take a look at where people are protesting, what they are protesting, and why they are protesting. There is no big surprise that when we examine the issues, there are few common factors. First we look at the leaders in those hot beds.

Bill de Blasio is an American politician who has served as the 109th mayor of New York City since 2014. A member of the Democratic Party, he was New York City’s public advocate from 2010 to 2013.

Andrew Graham Beshear is an American attorney and politician. Since December 2019, he has served as the 63rd Governor of Kentucky. A member of the Democratic Party, he is the son of Steve Beshear, the 61st Governor of Kentucky. Beshear was elected attorney general of Kentucky in November 2015.

Roy Asberry Cooper III is an American politician and attorney who has served as the 75th Governor of North Carolina since January 1, 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, Cooper had previously served as the elected Attorney General of North Carolina since 2001.

Anthony Steven Evers is an American politician and educator who has served as the 46th governor of Wisconsin since January 7, 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, Evers previously served as the Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction.

Gretchen Esther Whitmer is an American politician serving as the 49th governor of Michigan. A member of the Democratic Party, she served in the Michigan House of Representatives from 2001 to 2006 and in the Michigan Senate from 2006 to 2015. Whitmer was born and raised in Michigan.

Thomas Mark Barrett is an American politician and member of the Democratic Party who has served as the 44th Mayor of Milwaukee, Wisconsin since 2004. He served in the United States House of Representatives from 1993 to 2003, and the Wisconsin State Senate from 1989 to 1993.

Philip Dunton Murphy is an American financier, diplomat and Democratic Party politician who has been the 56th governor of New Jersey since January 2018. He served as the United States Ambassador to Germany from 2009 to 2013, during which time he dealt with fallout from the United States diplomatic cables leak.

It’s no surprise they are all democrats. All of them have another thing in common. They all believe they have the right and duty to cease total control when it is in the best interest of the people they serve. The only thing is, they are far from serving the people who elected them. They all believe in a strong centralized government. We can see how that concept of a strong centralized government eliminates every opportunity of being represented. They all ignore the protests. They all call the protests a political move blaming it on the republicans. Every attempt to regain the balance of power guaranteed by state constitutions is called a political attack. In essence we have a group of democrats who believe executive power is supreme power and should not be questioned. We have a group of people who oppose the constitution they swore to uphold and protect. In reality we have a group of democrats who are fighting against the constitution and the balance of power it guarantees. After looking at a number of stories we gather a number of views from different angles.

I have to note, I did not include links to sites that require a paid subscription to view the article. When we look at the general claims from those who are protesting we see a few common threads. People are telling the press, they are exercising their right to assemble and freedom of speech. We also have a story where people are showing up carrying arms. They are drawing attention to the second amendment which has been under attack for some time. People are protesting because they are not being heard. People are protesting because they live in cities and states led by democrats who refuse to listen to the voice of those who elected them. Demonstrators believe in a republic where elected officials listen to the people who put them in office. But that system is not working in particular areas in the US. This is not an isolated incident and is not restricted to COVID rules and regulations. This is a problem that has been around for years. The virus only magnified the problem.

Of course we have a number of news reports that people are holding Trump signs and the media has joined those democratic leaders in an attempt to ignore the core issue and turn the nationwide protests into a political battle. A quick look at the signs and and few interviews with the protesters tells us, people are taking to the streets because their rights are being denied and they see leaders ignoring and defying the constitution. That is the real threat America faces and no smoke screen will cover that up. Protesters all over the US are drawing attention to the constitution and the treats we face today.

Let’s take a logical look at the accusations leveled by those democratic leaders and the media who has chosen to support them. First of all, news is biased. The news we see is controlled by the highest paying advertiser. If the democratic party is the highest bidder for advertising, the media will go out of their way to write and post stories that support their advertiser. Today it is more difficult to dig deep enough to find the truth on any subject.

We have a group of powerful democrats who call protests supporting and defending the constitution a political move. They call it a political battle. Let’s take the democratic view a step further. Isn’t it rather alarming when one party calls an organized protest supporting the constitution a battle? Of course those democrats chose to ignore and over ride the constitution. This has been going on long before this virus crisis. Democrats have led fights against the second amendment. Democrats are constantly introducing bills that give special privileges and funds to minorities. Which is often viewed as buying votes but can also be viewed as a violation of civil rights when one group, any group is given special favors, funding, and privileges and other groups are denied those privileges, loans, and funding. It does not matter which minority group is given special privileges, it is a violation of the basic fundamental, we are all created equal. In the long run, granting special privileges to select groups is one item on a long list of excuses democrats are using to challenge the constitution. Their plan is to chop away at the constitution one article and one amendment at a time.

Democrats have been trying to under mind the judicial branch of the government. Recent court decisions across the US pointed out how executive powers have been abused during this crisis. Democratic leaders shunned those court decisions calling them political attacks. It doesn’t matter if protesters in the streets or supreme court judges point out violations against the constitution, democrats claim they are political attacks. That should answer the question for all Americans. Democrats across the US have declared war on the constitution and America’s civil rights. It doesn’t make sense to call every attempt to uphold and defend the constitution an attack. Support for the constitution is viewed as an attack only by those who intend to alter, change, or destroy the constitution. And that is what those protests have been about and what the will continue to be about. Protecting the constitution is primary.

We don’t need a new Constitution. We need to elect people who take their oath to support and defend the constitution seriously. Our rights and liberty depend upon it.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Wisconsin: The Governor Verses the Constitution.

Over this past week we have seen a lot happen in Wisconsin. We had to wait what felt like an eternity to hear the State Supreme Court decision on stay at home orders during this virus crisis. Within hours of the decision, Governor Tony Evers recorded a live phone interview with CNN. During his interview with CNN Evers was allowed to voice his opinion on a 161 page Supreme Court Decision. The majority of the claims Governor Evers made were completely contrary to the written decision released a few hours before the governor’s live interview.

Governor: “Overturning stay-at-home order puts Wisconsin ‘into chaos’”

Decision: ¶65 “Therefore, I conclude there is a legal basis upon which to consider the Legislature’s extraordinary request. I too am appreciative of the concerns raised by COVID-19 and the possibility of throwing the state into chaos. Accordingly, although our declaration of rights is effective immediately, I would stay future actions to enforce our decision until May 20, 2020.”

Governor: “Wisconsin Republican Legislature and those 4 Supreme Court Justices decided …”

Decision: Wisconsin Legislature, Petitioner

In its last act of judicial activism, the majority takes it upon

itself to immediately overturn Emergency Order 28, a remedy neither

party asked for.”

¶167 “Some would like to characterize this case as a battle

over the constitutional limits on executive power——can an

executive branch officer really shut down businesses, limit

travel, and forbid public gatherings? These are important

questions for sure, but they are not what this case is about. No

party has raised or developed such a claim. Some would also like

to frame this as a challenge to the government’s potential infringement of certain constitutional protections like the freedoms of religion, speech, and assembly, and the right to hunt and fish. But these issues are not before us either. No party

has raised or developed a claim along these lines. ”

¶254 “First, in what is a recurring theme, this argument was

not developed by any party. This is raised sua sponte by this

court without the benefit of adversarial briefing. We risk serious

error when we issue broad rulings based on legal rationales that

have not been tested through the crucible of adversarial

litigation. When accepting an original action, this danger is

even greater.”

Court records show the lawsuit was not filed by one party, or only by Republics on the State Legislature, but by both parties in a unified effort to ensure the security of the State Constitution they took an oath to defend. Evers wants people to believe this court case was a battle between Democrats and Republicans. Nothing could be further from the truth. Judge ROGGENSACK went out of his way to prove this decision was not a political move or one party attacking another. Evers wants people to believe every Democrat in Wisconsin supported his move to place the Constitution on hold, completely ignore it, and the Constitution needs to be modified. That is not the opinion of the Supreme Court nor the Legislature made up of Democrats and Republicans. As a whole the majority of the judges in the Wisconsin Supreme Court as well as the State Legislature agree, one man should never stand above the State Constitution establishing checks and balances to protect the rights of all Wisconsin citizens. Evers claims 69% of Wisconsin supported his decision to seize total control and pass that control onto those of his choosing.

Governor: “Today absolutely Republican Legislatures and those four Supreme Court justices decided that facts don’t matter, statues don’t matter, and frankly it puts our state into chaos. There are no regulations out there. Period.”

Reporter: “Does this mean all businesses in your state can open tomorrow or right away?”

Governor: “Yes. The Tavern league of Wisconsin sent a message to all the people in their organization saying you can open now. And that’s happening all across Wisconsin as we speak. So this is the wild west now.”

This clearly indicates, the governor did not read the court decision. Evers’ statement shows, his moves are 100% politically motivated. It also shows Evers has zero concern for the people he was elected to serve. By implying the Tavern League now sets the laws and standards in Wisconsin, Evers single handedly created a state of chaos. Which of course was his intent.

As governor, Evers is sworn to uphold the laws of Wisconsin. He had the opportunity to educate the public on the court decision but instead chose to turn the decision into a political battle, drive a wedge between democrats and republicans not only on the political field but throughout the state, and imply the court decision opened the door for any organization or individual to interpret the law they see fit. To imply one court decision removed all laws from Wisconsin is dangerous and naive statement beneath the dignity of any elected official in any capacity. What did motivate Evers to make such a statement?

After reading the court decision no one can argue the fact, this was a case of one person challenging the state constitution in what everyone agrees a national crisis.

¶69 “Endowing one person with the sole power to create,

execute, and enforce the law contravenes the structural separation

of powers established by the people. Through the Wisconsin

Constitution, the people confer distinct powers on the

legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.

“Three clauses of the Wisconsin Constitution embody this

separation: Article IV, Section 1”

What was Evers’ motive to change the State Supreme Court decision centered on the State Constitution into a political battle between parties? The detail that should come to every educated voter mind is the fact Tony Evers was in charge of the state education system since 2001.

After working as a schoolteacher for several years, he became a school administrator, serving as a principal and, later, district superintendent. Evers first ran for Superintendent of Public Instruction in 1993 and again in 2001, losing both elections. Evers was instead appointed deputy superintendent, a position he served in from 2001 to 2009. In 2009, he ran for Superintendent of Public Instruction again, this time winning. He was reelected twice, in 2013 and 2017.”

There is no better expert on the Wisconsin school system than Tony Evers. Before making that phone call to CNN, Evers had to decide to gamble on the presumption that no one would read the actually court decision. Having a clear insight to the Wisconsin educational system, Evers felt secure enough to do a live interview, present his view of the facts knowing CNN would never question nor research his claims, and few if any individuals in Wisconsin would fact check his claims. Evers also banked on the idea that voters supporting his party would accept a pack of lies because it damages the reputation of the opposing party. Voters supporting Evers would accept statements aimed at damaging the reputation of Republicans without checking the actual facts. Evers comments achieved their goal. News agencies all over the country chose to air Evers comments, presenting them as facts without ever reading the actual court decision. Here is one random example of the fake news Evers sparked.

Wisconsin Is a Warning

On Wednesday night, the state’s highest court issued a hyperpartisan ruling that endangers thousands of lives.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court invalidated the state’s stay-at-home order on Wednesday in a 4–3 decision that condemned the public health measure as a grave assault on citizens’ constitutional rights. Two justices compared the order, which closed nonessential businesses and limited large gatherings of people, to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Even though the plaintiffs and defendants agreed the court should put its ruling on hold, the majority of justices refused to do so, instead implementing the decision immediately. As a result, Wisconsinites flocked to reopened bars Wednesday night during a pandemic, in a state that is nowhere close to flattening the curve.

Like the governor, the media neglects to cover news in an unbiased fashion or provide a link for readers to further research the reasoning behind comments and the decision as a whole.

Decision: “We mention cases like Korematsu in order to test the limits of

government authority, to remind the state that urging courts to

approve the exercise of extraordinary power during times of

emergency may lead to extraordinary abuses of its citizens.”

Meanwhile, Kelly’s concurrence displayed a remarkable lack of humility for a judge who was just soundly rejected by the people he serves. He proposed new, far-reaching limitations on the executive branch’s authority, carrying forward the Legislature’s crusade to strip the Democratic governor of his powers. Oddly enough, both Kelly and Bradley rooted their theories in the Wisconsin Constitution—but they repeatedly cited three opinions involving the federal Constitution: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. U.S., Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. Olson, and Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in Department of Transportation v. Association of American Railroads. None of these opinions actually carries legal weight. Yet it appears that Kelly and Bradley will transform them into Wisconsin law if they get the opportunity.”

That news story did provide a number of links to back up its story. The majority of links supplied take the reader to other biased articles written by the same news agency and other news agencies with articles that agree with their false statements. In other words, their reporting is biased and as any reader with an open mind can tell, is dedicated to changing state constitutions and our federal Constitution. Why do media outlets and a small minority of politicians want to change the Constitution? And why does the media go out of its way to hide any logical conversations about the Constitution from the public and throw up smoke screens to redirect public attention to senseless battles over just about every word in the Constitution?

So far we have a debate over rights preserved in the state constitution redirected into a political battle. And we have a governor with nearly 2 decades of experience in the state education system. Add to that certain media outlets who neglect to check the facts he presented. The first detail we need to consider is, what kind of educator in their right mind would teach a generation to accept opinions without gathering and examining facts? Socialist do. Communists rely on that type of thinking.

Is there a link between Governor Evers comments on the Supreme Court decision, the failing education system, and the democratic-socialist movement across the US? There is another leading indicator to consider. Every socialist movement relies in two main details, the ability to control people and taking away their ability to defend themselves. How does Governor Evers stand in gun control?

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says Republican legislative leaders who oppose gun control bills that polls show enjoy broad public support are essentially telling the public to “go to hell.”

Evers made the comment Monday after calling the Republican-controlled Legislature into a special session — which will take place Nov. 7 — to take up a pair of gun control measures that GOP leaders have been unwilling to debate.

The governor had called on lawmakers to take up an expansion of background checks and a so-called “red flag” law, which would allow gun rights to be temporarily revoked from individuals who are deemed by a court to be potentially harmful to themselves or others.

Republicans have argued the bills violate Second Amendment and due process rights. They declined to advance other gun-related proposals during the special session as well, though Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, argued the Assembly’s work on suicide prevention and attempted veto overrides related to mental health funding would address the root cause of gun violence.

The governor has cited strong public support for both expanding background checks and the red-flag proposal. According to recent polls from Marquette University Law School, both measures have at least 80 percent approval from Wisconsin residents.

To examine this piece of evidence, we need to consider a few facts. What was Evers’ motive in introducing those bills. I think the majority of people agree on back ground checks and the fact we need to get guns out of the hands of individuals who pose a threat to themselves and others. Wisconsin along with most other states have laws on the books that do just that. Legislatures told Evers his laws would be a violation of Constitutional rights. Another example of Evers attempting to under mind the Constitution.

Some accuse Republicans of catering to voters. Let’s check out the facts on that accusation. Wisconsin does have a bunch of hunters. Are they enough to sway a vote?

A blogger added up the deer license sales in just a handful of states and arrived at a striking conclusion:

There were over 600,000 hunters this season in the state of Wisconsin …. Allow me to restate that number: 600,000!–Pretty-Amazing

The State of Wisconsin had 3,397,693 active registered voters on May 1, 2020.

Hunters account for less than 20% of general voters. Hardly a number to be concerned about at the polls. So we would have to accept the fact, the Republican majority in the Senate along with the majority of Democrats in the state legislature do not agree with Governor Evers’ quest to change the State Constitution. Not for far reaching gun laws going beyond laws already on the books. The legislature does not agree with changing the Constitution to open the doors for the confiscation of guns by any agency the governor decides to name in the future. We’ve seen that fail with the COVID orders. We can thank the Wisconsin legislative branch for putting a stop to that type of power grab in other areas.

After the court decision was released, mayors and county executives threatened to impose stricter restrictions in their cities and counties. Did you see what just happened? State gun control laws allow cities and counties to pass their own local laws. Every business in Wisconsin has the right to ban guns on their property. State law contains a list of properties where firearms are not allowed. Cities and counties have forearm ordinances on the books. If they wanted a total ban on guns, or certain types of guns, they have the right to pass ordinances in their cities and counties. Why do they refuse to pass local ordinances on guns, but want the state to pass state laws and the federal government to pass federal laws enforced throughout the country? If you have a problem in your backyard, handle it. But don’t make my problem your problem.

That was the problem we saw with the COVID laws. The entire state was made to suffer equally. If one city has people who refused to follow orders, stricter orders were put in effect for the entire state. And now we have cities and counties saying they will address local problems. In some areas that may be a good idea. I would suggest caution. If the State Supreme Court just told us those orders were unconstitutional, what good is it going to do when mayors and county executives begin passing local ordinances that are unconstitutional? The Supreme court already warned the door is open for companies and individuals to sue the state for damages. In the long run, lawmakers could cost taxpayers billions of dollars. Which would be nothing new. If you did a little research it would not take long to uncover one example after another of special interest groups demanding special treatment for one group or another. Shortly after a law is passed and certain groups receive special assistance based on sex, creed, color, or nationality, the same group that demanded that special treatment rushes in with a host of lawsuits representing groups who claim discrimination. Actions like that cost taxpayers billions of dollars. Much of that money is funneled into political campaigns promising programs for every minority under the sun. People are elected. New laws favoring one group above all others is passed. Lawsuits are filed and the wheels keep turning, driving the average taxpayer into the ground. This has to stop. This will continue until the average American voter takes on the responsibility of becoming an informed voter. Do not allow the media to deceive you.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Fear is the Real Crisis

Since we already know the devil is living in fear and can only lead through fear, how does that attitude transfer over to those he controls? We all know the devil has different degrees of control over people. Some are totally controlled by his evil powers while others drift in and out of the devil’s control in what appears to be a matter of convenience. Some of the worst offenders of that convenience excuse are Christians and churches who use their own form of fake news to instill fear while increasing numbers and of course income. Then we have the obvious, major corporations and corrupt political figures who always seem to have a plan to get ahead, gain more money and more control. If nothing else this coronavirus crises has shown the US who not to trust with power.

During his live news updates President Trump has repeatably said how he wants the states to exercise their authority and the federal government is in charge of overseeing those moves, gathering and examining the data, and of course making a decision when required. President Trump has called in hundreds of leaders and experts from many different fields. It is obvious no one is an expert in what has been called, “an unprecedented crises.” President Trump has exhibited his organizational skills and when required, his negotiation skills. Both of which depend on gathering and examining data. President Trump has put together large groups of experts in the medical field, logistics, computer modeling, and business to name a few. President Trump has been able to cross party lines in his meetings with governors and mayors across the US. For the most part they are united in the effort to put an end to this virus and get America back to work and back to normal. Of course there is a small minority who oppose every effort and blatantly oppose President Trump and his collection of experts at every turn. My dad would always say, “don’t complain unless you have a better idea.” That saying has its roots in the fact that some people are poor leaders. They have an inferiority complex and are not happy unless they put everyone down. Their natural knee jerk reaction is to find fault in everyone and everything, but never come up with an original idea or solution. To hide that fault, they strive to be the loud mouth in the group dominating every conversation and oppressing the thoughts and ideas of everyone else involved. In short, those are the type of people this world would be better off without. But for some reason they tend to attract large numbers of people. Mostly people with the same attitude and dysfunctional personalities.

In the middle of this war on the coronavirus we have to ask ourselves why a handful of politicians and major corporations decided to protest against plans to deal with this virus and reopen business in the United States. Minutes after a news briefing where the President’s plans are clearly laid out, Democratic leaders instantly condemn those plans. This is one fact I find impossible to understand.

Pelosi also said she hasn’t watched Trump’s daily briefings, in which the president often contradicts himself or offers false or inaccurate statements that his own team of health officials then have to rebut in real time.

I don’t watch them. I sometimes see inadvertently or just by accident some of the news reporting on it,” Pelosi said of the briefings, which sometimes stretch for more than two hours. “But I just don’t have time for that. I am a busy person. I have a day job, and it’s not to watch the president contradict himself on TV.”

Pelosi admits she has not watched any Presidential news briefing. She admits she knows nothing about plans to reopen the country. But Pelosi does not hesitate to condemn any plan to reopen business in the United States. We have to ask why? Pelosi and other Democratic leaders condemn every plan without listening to those plans. That indicates a serious inferiority complex most people instantly see through. Those Democratic leaders have not offered a plan of their own. Their only plan is to criticize any and every plan to reopen business in the United States. That is not a plan. That is treason in its highest form.

When we look at a problem, any problem, anyone with common sense would examine what information is available, and what information they need to solve the problem at hand. That is why the President brought hundreds of people together with skills in dozens of different fields. President Trump and his staff know they have to gather data on a scale the world has never seen before. It has to be gathered quickly, accurately, and placed in the hands of the best experts in the world to examine. That group of experts has to put aside their pride and have an open mind to examine every detail from every angle. If nothing else, President Trump has the skills and experience putting such groups of people together and motivating them to place the success of the project in front of personal interests. That is a skill few people have. If nothing else, everyone should see the contrast between Pelosi’s leadership skills and President Trump’s.

The project of opening up American business is very complicated. We all agree, this is going to require a large amount of data. While the people President Trump appointed to the task are working long hours in a race against time to formulate a plan, Pelosi has come out acting the part of the expert without offering a single detail, plan, or logical step.

How is this data going to be collected? Will states be in charge? What part will city, town, and village governments play? What about well organized charitable organizations? Will the military play a part? If so, what is the military role and how will the nerves of the average American citizen be calmed? During all of this, America has to fight fake news. Much of that news originating from overseas. Or worse yet, the Speaker of the House and other House members.

Somehow the testing has to be done. Where to begin? Data collected so far shows states in which the virus has little effect. Some counties have not been effected. Is it safe to reopen businesses in some counties and monitor the spread of the virus? Will the country reopen for business on a state by state basis or do we have to reduce that to a county by county basis? Maybe a city by city, or town by town basis. No one has ever had to formulate such a plan.

What about testing? How is the information transferred from the streets to those all over the country networking together to find a solution? Someone has to develop a database. I’m talking about a database everyone involved can use. A database that allows the information to be arranged in dozens of different ways to examine details the average person would miss. That database has to be fluid as well as reliable. The information, studies, and models have to be shared. The database has to be compatible with modeling programs already in place and used by the experts who have been studying the effects of this virus for months. The database has to be compatible with different operating systems. And of course the database has to be secure.

A system has to be in place to track who is tested, when they were tested, retested, the results of that test, and hundreds of other details. Sooner or later details on underlying conditions has to be gathered and examined. All of those facts have to be compared to systems like the latest census data.

While President Trump’s team is working on details to overcome the threat this virus poses, Pelosi has nothing better to do than complain that no one knows what they are doing, and whatever they are doing is wrong. Looking at all of this, there has to be underlying factors involved. Why do key Democrats oppose the obvious with no rhyme or reason? We could write their reactions off as pure political moves. But when we look at that aspect, opposing progress in the manner key Democrats are following is more like political suicide. If the Democrats today opposed President Roosevelt after Pearl Harbor was bombed, how would the average American react? If today’s Democrats opposed President Bush after the 911 attacks, how would the average American react? In either of those cases, I am sure the American public would demand that those people would immediately be removed from office. How did America reach this stage where we see so many people openly opposed to a united front to defeat the threat America is facing today?

Since 2016 America and the world has been engulfed in fake news. After four years obvious patterns have developed. When we put the facts together we see one obvious pattern. Two major groups insist on using fake news to sway the American voter. Actually fake news is being used all over the world to sway votes. Once we examine the facts something far sinister than lies floats to the surface.

We have to ask why Youtube decided to place an anti-Trump ad at the beginning of every news briefing. The average American voter is not afraid to tell the world if they support Trump, Biden, a third party, or as undecided. That is not the case for those anti-Trump ads. Whoever paid for those ads is going out of their way to hide their identity and main contributors. If you support a cause, and you believe in that cause, you are not afraid to put your name on that support. That is not the same case for the anti-Trump movement. They prefer to remain anonymous. To get at the bottom of this, we have to demand why. That is the logical course of action.

When we make a list of those involved in the anti-Trump movement we come up with a list of key Democrats. Not all Democrats, but those who always seem to gain the news spotlight. We also have a short list of mega companies that for the most part control Internet advertising, searches, and have in the past displayed their own brand of censorship. We also come up with the usual influence from overseas. Most of the overseas contributors are from the Middle East and communist countries. The obvious question is, why are key Democrats and major US corporations working in conjunction with overseas organizations the average American voter views as enemy forces? The obvious answer is politics. That raises a number of other questions.

Bernie Sanders ran for President as an open socialist and communist. Surprisingly that didn’t raise a red flag with many American voters. Which shows how misinformed many voters are and how easily swayed some voters are.

Biden is not far behind in socialist and communist influences. To understand those influences we have to look at Biden’s influence and accomplishments in Ukraine. We need to look much deeper than the speeches and promises made. We have to couple the actual facts and history in Ukraine to follow and then see who was involved in what, and get a glimpse into situations that are obviously hidden from the public’s eyes and ears.

First a glimpse into Ukraine’s history.

Modern history of Ukraine

This is important to understand the big picture. Especially today because a majority of the US has forgotten their roots. They have either forgotten or not been told why their parents of grandparents came to the US. It was of course to begin a new life. They came to the US to escape control by oppressive governments. In Ukraine’s case, we can see a history of control by foreign governments one after another. For the most part Ukraine is like many other European countries. They believe in a small federal government with the majority of control at the local level. The people want to be able to face those in charge of making decisions and spending tax dollars. They want to sit in the same room with the people elected to make decisions and discuss the options. In the long run, for the most part Ukraine is like many in this world who want to live their lives in freedom and security with as little government influence as possible. That’s what they wanted when they revolted from Russia. Freedom from big government is what they want today.

After declaring Independence from Russia, Ukraine had to undergo certain changes. Under communist rule all the companies were state owned. A plan was formulated to privatize those businesses.

History, goals of the reform and possible future policies towards privatization in Ukraine

The Revolution of Dignity of 2014 raised the expectations that more enterprises would be privatized as transparently as the Kryvorizhstal back in 2005. However, the major companies’ privatization attempts have been blocked either by vested interests of the incumbent management or by the oligarchic lobby.

The plan was simple. Sell companies to individuals and use the funds for government operations like the military. But it wasn’t as simple as that. Ukraine had to deal with corrupt officials in their own government as well as hundreds of outside influences.

You say 33 countries were represented at the forum. You mean the laundered Ukrainian money is now on the accounts of 33 countries?

Thirty three are the ones that accepted the organizers’ invitation and came. For example, there were representatives from the Isle of Man and the island of Jersey. The 33 do not necessarily have anything to do with Yanukovych’s money.

But it became clear to us from backstage chats that even the insular countries that imposed no sanctions on our ex-officials brought some information on their accounts, property, and assets.”

And what did Ukraine bring?

My impression is that our law-enforcement bodies are making very slow progress in solving economic cases. There are several factors that cause this. These crimes are very complicated indeed, and one must know how to tackle them. Our side does not have this experience. Moreover, the investigation of these crimes needs proper coordination, whereas in Ukraine the Interior Ministry and the Prosecution Service stay out of contact.”

The press service of the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine released the other day a statement of the Acting Prosecutor General Oleh Makhnitsky that Ukraine knows how to speed up the recovery of billions-worth funds stolen from the Ukrainian people and criminally smuggled out of this country. He allegedly said this in London at a joint press conference with US Attorney General Eric Holder and British Home Secretary Theresa May. What is it all about?

I don’t know about the ‘summary procedure’ Makhnitsky spoke about. I have a record of his final speech – either I missed it or it was not there. He delivered a message, as all the others did, that the recovery of funds is a long and difficult process.

In theory, Ukraine can recover the money quickly. Other countries are ready to render prompt assistance in recovering these funds. But the reality is that if Ukraine fails to supply information about the criminal origin of funds, even the money now frozen on European banks’ accounts will have to be unfrozen.”

I have pages of links and data collected. It would take a volume of books to gather all the information on Ukraine, the problems they face, who is involved, and what steps are being taken to overcome the corruption they have seen. To keep this as short as possible, here is a list of articles, references, and sources.

Joe Biden Forced Ukraine to Fire Prosecutor for Aid Money

Joe Biden visited Ukraine six times in eight years while vice president

Biden bragged in 2018 that, as vice president, he threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees if Ukraine did not fire its top prosecutor Viktor Shokin. Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani alleged for months that Biden wanted Shokin fired because Shokin reportedly undertook an anti-corruption investigation into Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Burisma Holdings, which employed Joe Biden’s lobbyist son Hunter as a board member starting in 2014, reportedly paying him $50,000 a month. The Biden camp countered that Shokin was widely seen by the U.S. and Europe — and inside Ukraine — as ineffective, corrupt, and a hindrance to Ukraine’s progress. Ukraine’s parliament removed Shokin in 2016.

Two days before he fled Ukraine’s capital, President Viktor Yanukovych huddled on the phone for more than an hour with Vice President Joe Biden

Hunter Biden was a member of the board of directors at Burisma in 2014-2019.

As a result, as I travel across the country, I observe a collapse of the law-enforcement system, when the law-enforcement agencies do not even register thefts.”

Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed that the Obama Administration had been working on the dismissal of the then-prosecutor general of Ukraine, Viktor Shokin. “All of us in the Administration were trying to get rid of that prosecutor. From Obama to the secretary of state, to the vice president – all of us were working on that – the ambassador…” Kerry said, according to the Voice of America.

Read more on UNIAN:

UNIAN memo. Ukrainian authorities have been probing into money laundering in the amount of over US$33 million during the acquisition of a group of companies of Kherson oil transshipment, in which Wirelogic Technology AS, Digitex Organization LLP, and ex-Minister of Ecology, businessman Mykola Zlochevsky’s Burisma Holdings Limited were involved. Hunter Biden, son of former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, was a member of the latter’s board.

Read more on UNIAN:

Beyond any shadow of doubt the sale of state owned companies in Ukraine met with nothing but closed door, backroom deals. Funding had to come from somewhere. The people in Ukraine who purchased those companies on paper didn’t have the funds. In most cases the sale price was pennies on the dollar. When you are dealing with companies worth hundreds of billions of dollars, you are still talking about billions of dollars. Money no individual in Ukraine had after declaring independence from Russia. Where did those funds come from?

Let’s take a look at the investment opportunities. Doors were open to purchase companies worth several billions of dollars for a few hundred million or less. The opportunity to see returns of 1000% and greater were on the table ready to be divided. Who do you think were attracted to that table to feast? Those with bank accounts large enough to make cash offers and close the deal fast.

After weeks of pulling up public information it became evident that individuals and companies who purchased those companies in Ukraine took every measure to conceal their identity. They hid behind holding companies, trust funds, and created a paper trail between Ukraine and themselves spanning a number of companies in numerous countries making it nearly impossible for anyone to link the purchase to the actual source of funds.

In April 2014, the Serious Fraud Office of the United Kingdom launched a money laundering investigation against Zlochevsky and accounts of Burisma Holdings and its parent Brociti Investments at the London branch of BNP Paribas containing US$23 million were frozen. That money was transferred as a result of complex transactions by a company controlled by a Ukrainian businessman Serhiy Kurchenko, a subject of the European Union restrictive measures.[39] When the Ukrainian prosecutor general’s office failed to provide documents needed for the investigation, a British court in January 2015 dropped the case and ordered to unfreeze the assets.[40] In September 2015, then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt gave a speech in which he called out Ukrainian prosecutors for failing to cooperate with the investigation.[40]

This is highly unusual unless there is a good reason for individuals and companies to create the maximum amount of distance between themselves and the companies in Ukraine they purchased. To name a few reasons, organized crime was involved. That brought in arms dealing, drug dealing, and human trafficking, the last thing predominant politicians and businesses want to be linked to. Billions of dollars of US funds and funds from other countries were funneled through those companies into the bank accounts of major investors. Initial profits were not enough for some of those investors. How do we find out who those investors are? How to we trace them down?

The links above show how Ukraine has made it a top priority to clean up its reputation and prove to the world Ukraine has a government for the people and by the people. Investigations have been going in since 2005, escalated after the 2014 Ukraine revolution, and continue today. When we look at those investigations we can’t help but realize President Trump was being impeached over investigations that began a decade before he took office. Which brings us to the most obvious point of all, how to identify those involved in the purchase of Ukrainian businesses. To construct a list all we need to do is pay attention to those who have been going out of their way to put a stop to investigations in Ukraine. Everyone around the world can see who those individuals and companies are. Facebook is one of those companies who has gone out of their way to remove reports, comments, and links that demand on investigation. The ad giant Google has been more than one sided in it statistic placement of ads aimed at destroying President Trump and swaying the election. Many US news agencies have gone out of their way to confuse the issue muddy the waters, add fake news stories, and to be blunt, become perfectly biased on the 2020 election. Why did those news agencies abandon their code of ethics? Everyone involved in the corruption in Ukraine is running scared.

We have to ask the logical question, why are news agencies, US politicians, and major corporations backing a socialist candidate for President? Sure Biden is socialist. Look at the government he helped install in Ukraine. A government that was over thrown by the people in 2014. The people Biden hand picked and supported with US funds have been arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced. Some fled the country and face outstanding warrants. Those are the type of people Biden associated with and worked with to arrange those sweet deals when Ukraine sold those companies.

Why would individuals and companies back a socialist? Are there backroom deals we will never hear about? Do those companies and politicians really believe they will be safe once socialism reaches the White House? Can they really trust a socialist or the next socialist to gain power in the US? Socialism is a real threat in the 2020 election. What makes those individuals and companies willing to back up a socialist with their check books? To the average person there is little to gain and a lot to loose. In the blink of an eye a socialist government can cease businesses, bank accounts, and every asset and freedom we have as Americans. What would force people to take that chance? Nothing but fear.

If Biden wins the election, their secrets of what happened in Ukraine are safe. If President Trump is elected, those backroom deals stand a pretty good chance of being exposed for the world to see. Politicians who have been mouthing off about gun control in the US will be linked to arms deals in Ukraine. Politicians who have been spouting off about their concern for immigrants and minorities will be linked to human trafficking. Politicians who have been promising tax cuts for decades will be linked to money laundering in Ukraine including US tax dollars. If President Trump is reelected we may see the political system in the United States implode. If Biden is elected President we can be assured, the truth will be buried.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

$1200 Stimulus and Social Security

Just talked to an aid for one of the Congressmen here is Wisconsin with an update on stimulus checks for those on social security. What seemed like an easy task, send out $1200 stimulus checks to everyone on social security turned out to be more of a task than first expected. The plan was to create a computer program to cross reference those on Social Security with those who filed taxes and develop a list so every eligible person received 1 check. After the initial system was developed, other features had to be added. Veterans had to be included in the cross reference check in addition to another list of all those deceased, and a few others who would show up on more than one list as well as those who are not eligible for the stimulus check. The IRS system data had to be cross referenced with social security system data as well as veteran’s system data, and a few others. As the programming progressed, some funds were transferred to bank accounts while others were mailed. The new program also has to cross reference data on bank deposits and mailed checks. Which means a lot of checks and double checks to ensure every eligible person receives one check.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!