Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

All of Us are Shades of Gray

Watching the Elon Musk offer to purchase Twitter was the tipping point. Elon Musk is an inventor, one of the richest people in the world, the person who has taken the electric motor to new levels, developed and built the fastest car in the world, and up to the moment of his bid to purchase Twitter, a sort of glory figure held up by the left media and leaders on the left pushing their new green deal to change the world. It seemed rather strange to watch one man raised up as a savior of the world one day and condemned as a traitor the next day.

Offering to buy Twitter did one thing. It took the mask off the radical left showing exactly where they stand. Any common thinking person would take Elon Musk, and anyone else at their word then wait to see that happens. Why does Elon Musk want to buy Twitter? To take control of the communication giant and get rid of all the censorship. All of it. To take out all the algorithms designed to restrict the subjects they restrict while those algorithms allowing other, rather offensive and radical thoughts, including threats to flourish on their media platform.

In simple terms, history itself has set the prime example of two sides of the media all normal people will question. Elon Musk simply stated, he is buying Twitter, “to ensure freedom of speech.” I had the opportunity to serve in the army under my dad who put on a uniform for 38 years. Every couple of months he gave his branded speech.”We put on this uniform to defend everyone’s freedom of speech. Even when we don’t agree with them.” That is the simplest explanation I’ve ever heard and sums up the corner stone of our Constitution.

When history presents two opposing forces, we need to take a step back, and in simple terms, give God the credit. By some astronomical chance two events presented themselves for consideration at the exact same time. Elon Musk wants to buy Twitter to ensure freedom of speech. The left media jumped all over that story presenting the purchase of Twitter as some sort of threat. Any common thinking person would look at the facts presented with a grain of salt, take a step back and compare the facts from other stories to see the big picture. Then ask a few questions. The first of which is of course, why do people in the media and some talk shows consider free speech a threat? Of course we can look at their actions over the past few years to see the answer. All we need to do is look at what has been heavily censored on social media platforms. The first of which is free speech surrounding the 2020 election. Any accusations about a fixed election have been all but outlawed in the US. Accounts offering evidence of a fixed election have been shut down. The other heavily censored subject is the covid-19 issue. Only communication supporting the vaccine are allowed on the most popular social media platforms. Any comments about alternative cures to covid, and any negative comments about the vaccine are looked at as a threat. A threat as serious as the threat of free speech. Many media sources and day time talk shows have joined the bandwagon to suppress any comments on the election and covid they do not agree with. Which raised a lot of questions and for the most part, people have become rather wary of the news and talk show hosts which have taken a rather biased stance on both subjects.

Then something happened to clearly show the line draw in the sand. It is clear to see media has reacted through fear to flood the world with comments to block Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter. Everyone can see the fear in their faces, hear fear in their voices, and the fact, their comments make no sense, or shall we say, clearly spell out their desire to eliminate free speech at all costs. Imagine being on the verge of accomplishing the impossible, ending free speech and eliminating the Constitution in the US. In their eyes, the goal was in sight. They felt they could reach out and touch it. Then suddenly, one man stands up to shatter their dreams. Of course their reaction is going to be far from sane. Their reaction is going to border on the insane.

Some of the comments about Elon Musk buying Twitter revealed the left’s sinister motive. Some commented along the lines, attempting to make stock holders feel guilty if they sold out at a 50% profit. Having someone with no idea what is actually happening spurting out advice is ridiculous. With no financial stake in the issue, media figures are trying to force a guilt pill down the throats of common investors the media views as stupid. As if those media figures have built a trust between everyday people and themselves. In short terms, media figures have gone overboard, they view themselves as gods the masses will follow no matter what. Some of their comments may be borderline illegal when it comes to investment advice. There are laws controlling investment advice. People need to be licensed to give investment advice. Elon Musk faced charges based on investment comment he made in the past. Here we have another in a long list of double standards. Elon Musk created that tipping point where people need to make the choice, will they follow their media gods, or will they open their eyes and use the brain God gave them? That is a rather tough decision considering the fact, the left has been pounding away at any reliance on God’s immune system for over a year. The call of,”trust in science,” includes trust in the media whether is is said out load or not. The decision has to be made.

The decision to trust in the media or common sense should be an easy choice when we look at a collection of events and details presented the same week Elon Musk offered to purchase Twitter. The New York subway shooter had no problem posting his hatred and open threats on the same social media that heavily censored every question about the 2020 election, covid-19, and vaccine. In simple terms, social media revealed their true motives. The media always has a way of exposing their motives no matter what the subject is. In the case of the NY subway shooter, they refused to mention, the NY shooter was black. Then they attempted to justify the shooter’s actions by claiming he was oppressed because of his color. It seems the media forgot about what was happening half way around the world at the same moment.

The media has been playing their race card for quite some time. They want to convince people, blacks have a unique history shared by no one else in the world. The left wants to use slavery in the US that ended 155 years ago as an excuse to serve a number of details in their agenda. But what about the people in Ukraine? Putin wants to either destroy or enslave Ukraine. Left media has been covering the war in Ukraine while avoiding the obvious, Putin wants to enslave Ukrainians. Which is not new. Slavery in Europe was a threat one generation ago. Don’t forget about the slaves in Europe during WWII. Hitler enslaved people in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, and other countries? Hitler enslaved all of them, forcing them to build his war machine using slaves as free labor. The left media has to be insane to think they can make the world forget the slavery Germany, Japan, and Russia forced on their grandparents. After WWII, Russia took over all those countries and more, forcing them into slave labor to rebuilt the Soviet Union after the war. The media never talks about that slavery that happened a generation ago. The media does not want people to know slavery existed in the Soviet Union in the late 1940’s through the 1950’s and 1960’s. If they told the world about Russia’s reliance on slave labor, they would loose their narrative on the oppression of black Americans as the only slaves who ever existed in this world. I’ve heard my entire family was lost during and after WWII. Half were killed by Hitler, the other half by Russia after the war. They were never Jewish. The media wants the world to believe only Jews were exterminated and enslaved during WWII. Which is far from the truth.

The left media all over the world has their own view of history and uses it to their advantage. In the case of the NY subway shooter, the left media flocked to his defense. And of course are trying hard to cover up his social media communications. Social media allowed Frank James to post hate speech and treats because he learned them from the left news media outlets, day time talk shows, and social media platforms he visited and posted on a regular basis. On one side of the coin we see the left crying about Elon Musk’s attempt to introduce free speech. The other side of the coin shows the same left outlets defending Frank James’ hate speech and treats on the same media outlets. In other words, we can see what shades of gray media outlets are operating under.

Social media operated censorship under what they refer to as community standards. When we dig into those community standards we find things happening that most people would consider unacceptable. On social media you can find groups that are anti-everything under the sun. Frank James was anti-white, anti-Asian, and anti-everything that was not black. If you want dig deeper, you will find groups who are anti-law enforcement. Some of those private groups specialize in training members to resist arrest and make money doing it. They post private videos viewed by invitation only designed to train members how to resist arrest, video record the event, and sue the city for money. They compare an arrest to winning the lottery.

Social media is made up of a number of groups consisting of modern day witches and satanists. They post information including videos on animal sacrifices and comments on human sacrifices. There are videos and comments about curses, calling demons, and other bizarre subjects most people would consider illegal. While censoring comments on the 2020 election, covid-19, and the vaccine, subjects about witchcraft, demons worship, and sacrifices flourish. Hate speech like the type that drove Frank James into carrying out a mass shooting is actually encouraged in their community standards. The left media cannot resist the temptation to look at who Frank James communicated with and what they communicated about on social media outlets. But the media will never post that on their news stories. That is information they do not want anyone to know about. That is not to say the left media will not study those communications to refine their messages on the news and talk shows.

In Mexico the cartel is enslaving people using extortion. The cartel demands large sums of money to cross the border then adds on monthly payments to remain safe in the US. Extortion we have seen in the past. Reports have reached congress and the White House where little to nothing is being done. Left media once again attempts to cast a different light on the subject by making the White House look like a knight in shining armor offering immigrants a bright new life in the US including a new cell phone. Immigrants claim those cell phones are used to track them so the cartel knows where to go to collect their fees. In short terms, this is another form of slavery the left wants to cover up. It is amazing how the left can display slavery in their own terms while covering up slavery at other levels.

Another story we want to pay attention to comes out of El Salvador where the president ordered mass arrests of suspected gang members. When we look at the stories, we see social media and news media outlets were involved by allowing gang members to use social media to plan crimes including murders. Many of those plans were also announced on news media outlets. In the US and other parts of the world left media outlets condemned criminal arrests in El Salvador. Once again, another example of double standards. In the US we see an endless stream of stories about criminals with long arrest records being released on low or no bail on the streets committing crimes within hours or days after their release.

There has to be a reason many of those criminals have long arrest records with crimes against children being the common factor. The left has been working overtime defending pedophiles, as if they have an excuse for their crimes, or the left has a reason to legalize crimes against children. Which has been a common trend in Europe for nearly ten years where they have seen protests demanding one sexual crime after another be legalized. No one has an idea of what their ultimate goal is. There seems to be no end in sight.

Before you go patting yourself on the back, thinking you are better than those on the left, you need to take a look at yourself in the mirror. You may want to convince yourself, the left is filled with pedophiles preying on young people. So you may think, as long as you stay with people of approved ages, you are better than a pedophile. Jesus had an interesting comment on that. “But I say, anyone who even looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” (Mat 5:28 NLTse). It didn’t matter what age or sex the person was, adultery was adultery and danger lied in allowing the temptation to toy around in your heart and mind. Jesus referred to that as sin.

We have very little to go on when we look at the few examples when sin reached a level God had no other choice but to do something about it. The first was the flood. “The LORD observed the extent of human wickedness on the earth, and he saw that everything they thought or imagined was consistently and totally evil. So the LORD was sorry he had ever made them and put them on the earth. It broke his heart.” (Gen 6:5-6 NLTse). For obvious reasons, the Bible does not follow with a list of what those sins were. We need to scan the Bible over and over again before we begin to see trends. In a sense, the Bible is much like the events we see unfolding in the world today. If we don’t put the events together, we will never see the ultimate goals and how each faction is involved. We know there are only two sides and to think you are neutral is basically a death sentence. The people on the New York subway considered themselves neutral. That thought offered zero safety. If they had paid attention to news out of El Salvador and news from a few local law enforcement agencies warning about increased social media chatter between criminals, they may have been on guard looking for signs of attacks organized by the left. For some reason the New York mayor is calling for protests in the streets. Shop and business owners who will suffer damage will not remain neutral. Like it or not, those riots will involve them. No one will remain neutral. The world is filled with warning signs before major events happen.

Warnings are common in the Bible. God always gave warnings. When we review stories in the Old Testament, we can see how things reached a level when no one remained neutral. God send in angels to destroy armies and cities. No one remained neutral in those stories. It seems to be a good time to go over those stories to see what details are brought to light by the series of events happening today. Thinking you are neutral is no longer an excuse. You can either pay attention to the warnings or ignore them. It is a personal choice.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Liberty or death

Between my dad, brother, and myself, we have over 50 years of service in uniform. We all took an oath to defend the Constitution and follow orders including those from the Commander and Chief. That is much like a stool with 3 legs. Those legs include myself (anyone who took that oath), the President, and the Constitution. Remove any of those and everything falls.

The last thing I want to see is those 50 years add up to nothing. Not to mention the millions who took that oath. Every elected official takes a similar oath. That oath creates a brotherhood that begins in training, extends into service, then extends to everyone who has taken that oath.

My dad was in charge of the mechanics committee in the 84th Division in Milwaukee. My brother and I had the honor of serving under him. About every few months he would give his regular speech reminding us about the 1st Amendment, the freedom of speech we put that uniform on to defend. We may not agree with everyone, but no matter how much we may disagree, our service defends their right to have and share their view. Today there are thousands of videos on the Internet showing my dad was not the only person preaching about our freedom of speech.

We all served to guarantee freedom of speech. The second Amendment was a given and never discussed. What we never considered was a threat to our voting rights. Not until 2020. Our responsibility to vote has been threatened. Our right to vote has been stolen.

No one is neutral on the Constitution. You are either for or against the Constitution. When crimes are committed against the Constitution and our right to vote, they must be investigated.

Hundreds of people have followed laws by reporting election crimes to the proper authorities. Those people identified crimes and those responsible in courtrooms and legislature hearings. To date I have not seen a any charge filed against a single person responsible for interfering with the 2020 election. What good is a system to report crimes that carries no investigation or penalties?

No Mail In Voting

Are legislators and judges afraid of public backlash? Only a small minority of people stand against the Constitution and voter rights. As for the media, their backlash and threats are growing cold. The vast majority of people are tired of violence in the streets. If it wasn’t for paid protesters, few would have taken to the streets in 2020. Rioters and looters are paid mercenaries with no political views and no loyalty. Remove those paid rioters and all those protests would have remained peaceful. Paid rioters accounted for less than 1% of those who wanted their voices heard. People are leaving the social media giants in droves. Factions within the left have been at war with one another since the election drawing themselves into smaller and smaller splinter groups. Left to their own they have separated into warring factions and lost what power they imagined they had. This is history repeating. As Vice President Joe Biden engineered a government in Ukraine that included representatives from all factions, those seeking a democracy, a republic, communists, socialists, and Nazis. Biden thought he was smart enough and tough enough to force all those factions to work together. History shows us Ukraine hosted a revolutionary war in 2015 to over throw the government Biden played a key role in organizing. When we look at the cabinet Biden is forming today, we see Biden following the same plan he initiated in Ukraine. Biden is putting together a second attempt at gathering a number of radical factions which he will once again attempt to control. We cannot allow such an experiment in the US government to appease the goals of one self centered person attempting to cement his name in history.

The US needs people to stand up to corruption and take the lead in bringing people to justice who blatantly and knowingly have broken election laws. The US needs individuals to stand up against news and social media giants. Media factions may have funds, but their followers lack loyalty. The vast majority of people visiting news and social media websites demand voting transparency. That includes Democrats, Republicans, and Independent voters, all unified in the quest to uncover the truth. Those opposing the Constitution and voting laws like all criminal actions are a small minority.

At the very least legislators have to identify illegal votes including those cast by deceased voters, multiple votes by the same voter, and votes cast by non-residents and correct those numbers. Legislators have to investigate claims of voter steering in nursing homes and at the polls. Any backlash from those investigations and corrections to the vote totals will erode the little support news and social media has left after the election. The tide will turn and the backlash will fall upon fake news and social media that has been censoring the American public that has grown weary of those controls.

It will not be easy but legislators need to look at the hard drive image of voting machines in question. The report on voting machines tells nothing. Hand picked voting machines were examined by the same people who most likely committed voter fraud and did nothing more than provide them with the opportunity to present shallow evidence to over shadow the questions at hand. It does no good at all to feed the same ballots through the same machines and expect a different result. Allowing the election commission to hand pick those machines is as useful as police asking a criminal to supply whatever gun they want to conduct ballistics tests. Of course the criminal will do whatever they can to hide evidence. Those on the election commission know which machines were used to count ballots that surfaced after the election and have more than adequate time to wipe evidence from those hard drives. Examining hard drives will show when programs were added, tested, modified, and deleted in attempts to cover up any crime. It will also show exactly when ballots were scanned and how they were counted or manipulated.

As of today we have conflicting reports between states. In Arizona election commission officials claim they have no read or write privileges to Dominion voting machines. In Michigan Dominion testified, the end user has the ability to alter the program. Dominion also explained how switching cards on the voting machines can alter votes during and after the election. In Michigan, Dominion also testified their machines were never programmed to read any of the mail in ballots. Which means they had to be read by hand. Which raises more questions. Were the machines in Wisconsin programmed to read mail in ballots? Where and how were those ballots counted? What has been done to ensure no one voted mail in and at the polls? Is the state legislature going to continue to have the election commission investigate themselves after hearing testimony from a number of people filing complaints to expose voter fraud on election day and days following the election? At the present time it appears the criminal in voter fraud is also the investigator, prosecutor, defense, and judge.

I’ve watched the majority of the state legislation hearings. After viewing that hearing I noticed one thing missing. The hearing was filled with people who signed sworn affidavits and provided testimony of laws broken and ignored. That was a hearing open to the public. How many democrats were willing to sign a sworn affidavit stating all election laws were followed and the 2020 was a fair, untainted election? A hearing has to look at both sides. If a business faces charges from OSHA, the business licensed in Wisconsin has no choice but to provide evidence in a court of law showing their plan to follow OSHA regulations. Our election process is at least as important as any OSHA safety regulation. Not only does the election commission need to prove they are aware of the laws they are to follow, they have to provide evidence of their training, and the execution of those regulations. What are plans for the state legislation to deal with the regulations that were ignored or locally modified? I’ve experienced voter discrimination first hand in 2016. Back then I considered it an isolated incident. 2020 shows us election discrimination is wide spread and organized. People are being trained to excel in voter discrimination.

When we see the same tactics used from precinct to precinct, city to city, and state to state, we have evidence of a planned coup that needs investigation at the highest levels. The tactics used to control the vote in 2020 were planned in advance. Information was shared nation wide. People were behind those plans. People who feel safe because they have been told, “no one ever faces charges for voter fraud.” Where are the charges? Where are the arrests? Why is every law enforcement agency ignoring the evidence supplied by individuals nation wide? When is someone going to take action?

The big question is, how to correct the 2020 vote results? Since there is no precedence, I am glad I am not in your shoes. No matter what the decision, there will be a backlash. If the count is over turned in steps, such as removing dead votes, double votes, and other illegal votes, the waters can be tested for reaction. That video on the hearing also contained good news. Democrats and Republicans are coming together. At least a few Democrats are ignoring party lines to stand up with the Constitution and laws of the land. Not to mention future integrity of elections. Needless to say, any steps in correcting the 2020 vote have to show unquestionable evidence. Special care has to be taken to ensure a Pandora box is not opened and misused by future generations. But something needs to be done. Something concrete that cannot be manipulated to turn future elections into something worse. The Supreme Court was right in their decision to turn the problem back to the states where actions need to be taken. The safe way out is to allow the election results to stand and work on tighter laws to secure future elections such as full time surveillance, and laws on the mail in voting allowed for people restricted to home due to medical conditions such as a doctor’s excuse and medial records. But can we afford the safe route? What will happen if the Wisconsin legislature examines votes on a case by case basis and makes the final decision on those votes and changes election results? Millions of people consider that an easy task. Others look at that as an end to democracy. Personally I look at changing the vote results as a signal to future attempts to manipulate elections. If nothing is done, the results could be compared to removing every speed limit sign in the state. At first the majority of people will continue to drive safe. A small minority will take that as a signal to drive full speed where ever they go, endangering everyone on the road. In a short time more and more people will follow suit and soon chaos will rule the streets. To do nothing will open the door to election chaos, a portion of the plan that allowed a handful of cities to corrupt the vote. No action is a clear sign to those who participated in voter fraud that nothing will ever be done. They are free to operate outside the law with no threat of criminal prosecution. We cannot live with that. Passing new laws will have no effect until those in place are enforced.

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

1st Amendment Under Attack

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Fictional Story

Dateline May 15, 2021

Neither sanctions nor tariffs aimed at the Soviet Union have eased the alleged Internet attacks leveled at the fabric of American society. In a prompt and short news briefing a congressional press associate told reporters, “we have no other choice but to monitor Internet activity from Russia and associated states operating websites dedicated to posting fake and malicious stories about American leaders and issues in America. Those stories will be blocked.”

Past reports on the Bill in question cited Russian interference with the 2016 presidential elections as the main reason to limit Internet activity originating from Russia and its supporting states. In 2016 both parties accused one another of collaborating with the Kremlin to sway the election. The fact that the 2016 presidential election was the closest race in American history fueled speculation and accusations. Although no concrete evidence was made public over the 3 year investigation, the public is still fascinated by shreds of hearsay and sensationalized stories.

In its own news briefing White House press agents promised the American public, “this censorship is a necessary evil and will be restricted to a small group of individuals that have been massing misleading stories about congressional candidates as well as candidates in the 2020 presidential election. Technology has become so sophisticated, altered media of every type is believed to have played a major role in election results in the majority of states.”

In answer to this new law the Kremlin released this response.

After all these years we finally see the United States show their real motives an intents. The US demanded the removal of the Berlin wall, the break of of the Soviet Union, and other measures to break down the people’s republic. Over all those years the United States has been demanding more freedom for the Soviet people. Now we see how serious the United States is about their freedom of speech. Forcing censorship upon the Soviet Union is only the beginning. It won’t take long for the United States allies to follow suit and introduce their own form of censorship. The Kremlin vows to preserve the rights of all Soviet citizens. The Kremlin will never change nor alter any of the rights the Union has worked to create and preserve.”

In a White House Tweet the American public was assured, “No American rights have been nor ever will be in jeopardy.” We are waiting for additional information to be released.

An undisclosed source told reporters. “Plans are in action to monitor and block additional sources of communication between USSR and America.” When asked if that included cell phones, no response was given. When asked if entire websites or individual stories would be blocked, no response was offered. When asked to define, “additional states,” no response was given.

Editorial

This of course is a fictional story. But could it happen? Where is the evidence Russia attempted to sway the 2016 presidential election? We know fake news agencies and so called, “reliable news sources,” tried their damnedest to sway the elections. Fake news agencies raked in millions of dollars while paying between $5000 to $10,000 for some of the most bizarre stories ever written. Fake news stories became easy money for the few lucky enough to sell a story to one of those agencies. Agency may be a stretch for some of those organizations. Many fake news agencies have small staffs. Many are one man bands. They are located all over the world. People jump on a money making bandwagon whenever they can.

Congress is addressing the situation at this time. Major social networks have vowed to eliminate fake news stories. Some may term their actions censorship. And it is. But there is no law penalizing any company for editing, rejecting, or otherwise restricting stories. That includes context on Internet sites. For the most part American businesses are still allowed to monitor and restrict forms of communication. As long as they do not discriminate against protected classes.

Fake news sites mimic well known news sites to such a degree, it is difficult to tell what site you are actually on. Here is a lost of fake news sites and the Websites they mimic.

New technology allows ad services to target certain groups. (Source) What does this mean to the average voter? As of October 2017, Gallup polling found that 31% of Americans identified as Democrat, 24% identified as Republican, and 42% as Independent.(Source) Even though the majority of voters in the US are independent, ads will focus on what party a computer program thinks they want you to see. What does this mean for American voters? If the software is biased, independent voters will be fed stories about one party and not the other. In the Cyber world that means, the other party doesn’t exist, or doesn’t stand a chance in the election. Can ads determine who will be president, and what party will control Congress? The answer is yes if the American public continues to rely on the Internet for information.

Historical References

Hitler was known for setting up fake attacks and events to start wars and limit the rights of ethnic groups he did not agree with. Even political partners cannot be trusted as Hitler proved in one of his political moves.

The Night of Long Knives

On July 13, Hitler gave a speech announcing the 74 “justified murders”: “If anyone reproaches me and asks why I did not resort to the regular courts of justice, then all I can say is this: In this hour I was responsible for the fate of the German people, and thereby I became the supreme judge of the German people” (Source).

By he proclaiming himself the supreme judge of Germany, he placed himself above law, making his word law. And, by aiding Hitler in the raid, the German army aligned themselves with Hitler.

The Reichstag Fire

Hitler, as we well know, did not stop here. Six days after the fire and his Reichstag Fire Decree, was a general election to dissolve the Reichstag. Even with a secret meeting at  Hermann Göring’s residence with 20-25 industrialists, Hitler was unable to gain absolute majority in parliament. However, on March 15, he and his cabinet began to draw up new plans to rid him of this dependency. These plans would ultimately become the Enabling Act. Simply put, the Enabling Act made Hitler dictator over Germany. It also gave him power to enact laws without the involvement of the Reichstag. The full text to the Enabling Act, as well as Hitler’s speech prior to passing said act, can be found by clicking the underlined Enabling Act above.

The next day (February 28), “Hitler declared a state of emergency and issued the Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of the People and the State” (Blankman, Conspiracy 31). This decree would suspend all major civil liberties. This included: “Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press; on the rights of assembly and association; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed” (Source).

Additional Research

What is being done to control the spread of fake news and targeted political ads? The FCC is adding new rules to curve targeted political ads.

Draft FEC Rules Target Political Ads on Social Media

News publishers protest Facebook’s new political ad rules

Ad Targeting

New technology allows advertisers to not only target audiences, but to custom tailor ads for individuals based on taste, habits, life style, location, and other data collected through computers and smart phones. Take for instance. Your smart phone occasionally registers in a fast food restaurant at 5:30 PM. New technology would allow ad companies to raise advertising rates by bidding off ad space in time segments. Fast food restaurants would fall over one another to capture your business. Automobiles now communicating with the Internet would tell ad companies when your oil needs changing, when a trouble light appears, and when maintenance is require. This opens the door to premium ad targeting on an individual level.


YouTube’s new ad tech automatically personalizes ads, can now target using Google Maps, app install data

Here’s how Facebook ad tracking and targeting works

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!
Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!

Obama and Hillary in Paradise

Exclusive pictures found no where else showing former president Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton at a paradise retreat.

These exclusive pictures obtained from an undisclosed source show former president Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton enjoying time on an island at an undisclosed location. An undisclosed source revealed that discussions between former president Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were undisclosed. We know there was sand and palm trees on the beach. Our undisclosed source did hint at one of the ideas brainstormed between former president Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Building a bridge between the main land and former president Barack Obama’s private resort. The purpose of this bridge is undisclosed.

The island consists of sand and palm trees. Based on our imagination and better judgment former president Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton needed to get away for a time. It seemed like a good idea. We have no idea how an undisclosed source with a camera found out about this meeting and how they got former president Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to pose for these unique and rare pictures.

Some people want to build walls. We want to build bridges

What we do know and what we can confirm is there was no real undisclosed source. The pictures are fake. The entire story is fake. We made up the story and the pictures. Not to offend anyone. But USA-eVote.com wanted to prove a point and do a little experiment.

A quick search on the Internet will reveal stories and videos featuring some of the most successful fake news agencies. Some of those sites average over 65,000 visitors a day and more. Some of the stories they launch receive over a million views within a few days. Who knows how many people share those stories. Who knows how many people wish those stories were real. How many people believe those stories are real?

Fake news agencies have become so successful and RICH, they caught the attention of what used to be known as legitimate news agencies who now exaggerate news, and of course jumped on the fake news story bandwagon. They may not have written some of the stories they post and broadcast, but they do fail to verify the sources.

USA-eVote.com is dedicated to bringing the public verified and unbiased stories. Most of which is about American and world history that has effected America’s history. We have determined, as a whole the American public is not interested in facts, accuracy, becoming educated voters, or learning from mistakes and events in history. The purpose of USA-eVote.com is to help educate the American public. An educated public is a strong public. This fake news is spreading like a cancer. Fake news is eating away at the American fabric. Fake news is dedicated to tearing America apart. The majority of fake news comes from oversea sources. They have a plan. America is at WAR with those oversea sources of fake news. Our Constitution guarantees FREEDOM OF SPEECH. At the present time the US Government is powerless to combat those fake news agencies. USA-eVote is dedicated to reminding the American public the REAL POWER lies with the people. We can change the world just like the veterans of the Revolutionary war, Civil War, WWI, and WWII did. All we need to do is stop visiting those fake news sites. Stop sharing those fake news stories.

If you pay attention to the stories on USA-eVote you will see a trend. USA-eVote has stories about former presidents who believed an educated public is a strong America. Former presidents saw how sources would attempt to erode America and its values by replacing education with sensationalism. We see it happening today. USA-eVote has also posted stories about traders. People who turned their back on America and the world. How greed effected them and the people they led. Hint – hint. We see it happening today at an alarming rate. We see America eroding. We see the dreams of America’s founders and former leaders being dashed and trampled on the ground. We see the enemy within and from overseas. We see plans hatching that are almost completely camouflaged. We see how the enemy hides behind the Constitution. We also see other warning signs.

To combat this latest threat created by fake news agencies America will have to sacrifice. Today Congress is considering Bills that would sacrifice certain rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Do you know what those rights are? Do you realize how quickly things can and will change? We do. That is why we post those Bills. So you can read them and vote on them. Leave your comments the thoughts. Help fight the threats that America faces from inside and outside.

At times it seems as if we are alone. The Internet is against USA-eVote. Social media views USA-eVote as a threat. We stand alone. But we stand in the way of social media and the Internets quest at increased profits. Fake news is the seed of those increased profits. What are you going to do about it? USA-eVote is dedicated to being unbiased. Based on history and current events, sharing those fake news stories is treason. But how can it be treason when the majority of people choose to travel the slippery sloop into the grave fake news has dug to bury the freedom our forefathers have fought and died to preserve?

Share and Share Alike. We like Shares!